Grain Prices Decrease On Strong Crop Conditions

Above average crop progress of corn, soybeans, and wheat across the U.S. has lead to a bearish outlook on new crop grain prices. The 2012 corn crop in good or excellent condition stood at a full 9% better than in 2011 and timely rains that moved across the Corn Belt at the end of the May should continue to suppress prices. The economic slowdown in the U.S., China, and the rest of the world has also pushed grain prices lower alongside the strengthening U.S. Dollar.

Farmers have been busy finishing their planting for the 2012 crop year as 76% of soybeans have already been planted as of May 29th. Soybean planting typically follows corn planting in the Corn Belt as corn has a longer growing period until reaching maturity. Fertilizer, herbicide, and pesticide application will now be farmer priorities heading into June.

Grain Prices

Corn prices closed at $5.55 per bushel and decreased by 18.9% in May due to excellent weekly crop condition reports by the USDA. Commercial profit taking by investors paired with the currently strong U.S. Dollar has caused corn prices to decrease with other commodities as well. Projected U.S. 2011/12 ending corn stocks were increased 50 million bushels to 851 million bushels due to larger than expected wheat supplies and the competitive pricing wheat has compared to corn, implying wheat will be the choice of feed this summer, according to the May USDA WASDE Report. Additionally, the average U.S. corn yield for 2012/13 was estimated at 166.0 bushels per acre by USDA which was a 2.0 bushel per acre increase from the 1990 to 2010 trend due to the early planting. Such a domestic yield would provide the U.S. with 15.7 billion bushels of corn, a 16.3% increase from previous estimates.

The rally in soybean prices ended this month with a 12.2% decrease to close at $13.40 per bushel. Prices were volatile throughout May but outside market pressure, a stronger U.S. Dollar, and commercial selling pushed soybean prices lower. The favorable weather throughout May in the Corn Belt has been hurting the majority of agricultural commodity prices. U.S. soybean production for 2012/13 was projected at 3.205 billion bushels in May's WASDE, an increase from 2011/12 due to increased yield projections of 43.9 bushels per acre in 2012/13, up 2.4 bushels per acre from previous estimates. Supplies of domestic soybeans were estimated at 3.43 billion bushels, a 4.0% increase from 2011/12.

Wheat prices declined by 0.6% this month, closing at $6.43 per bushel. Prices followed corn and soybeans downward on outside market pressure and above average crop conditions, although potentially dry conditions in the Southern U.S. Plains, Black Sea region, and eastern Australia have provided upward price support. USDA estimated 2012/13 production for U.S. wheat at 2.245 billion bushels, the highest since 2008/09. Average yields were estimated at 45.7 bushels per acre, an increase of 2.0 bushels per acre from 2011/12. Wheat supplies for 2012/13 were projected up 5.0% to 3.133 billion bushels in the May WASDE.

Farmland Values

Farmland values have been increasing across the Corn Belt in 2012. Federal Reserve Banks across the Midwest released their farmland value survey results this month and values increased by over 20% for the second straight year in the Tenth District in Kansas City and 19% year over year in the Seventh District in Chicago. Farmland values increased by 5% in the first quarter of 2012 in the Seventh District and 8% in the Tenth District. The demand for acquiring land is continuing to grow.

Farmers continue to be the support behind auction sales, driving up sales bids. Although investors were looking to purchase farmland, farmers purchased a higher share of acres sold in the past three months due to increased farmer income over the last year. Demand to purchase farmland was on the rise as 74% of bankers reported higher demand.

The Creighton University Rural Mainstreet Farmland Index decreased this month to 64.6 from 69.4 in April, although this month marks the 28th straight month the index has been above growth neutral. The farm equipment sales index increased to 65.1 from April's 62.4.

Planting Progress and Conditions

Crop conditions are well above historical averages as 72% of the U.S. corn crop is in good or excellent condition compared to 63% last year. As of the fourth week of May, 89% of U.S. soybeans have been planted, a 41% increase from a year ago. Of the 89% of planted soybeans, 61% have emerged which is an increase from 22% at the same time last year. We will continue to watch crop conditions and weather across the Midwest and gauge how realistic USDA's estimate of 166.0 bushels of corn per acre on average truly is.

Of the six primary spring wheat producing states 96% of the wheat has emerged, compared to the five year average of 68%. Spring wheat conditions are also favorable as 79% is in good or excellent condition and only 2% is in poor or very poor condition. Winter wheat continues to outperform 2011's conditions with 54% of the winter wheat crop in good or excellent condition; a 21% increase from last year. Winter wheat in very poor or poor condition is at 17%, a 27% decrease from one year prior.

Outlook

Grain markets will be heavily correlated to the weather patterns across the Corn Belt and crop conditions moving into the summer months. In late June, USDA will release an updated acreage report which grain markets will closely monitor for any changes to soybean and corn acres. Some isolated areas of the Corn Belt received significant rainfall that drowned out corn acres thus forced the field to be replanted with soybeans. Additionally, soybean prices at $15.00 per bushel in early May could have lead farmers to make a last minute switch from corn.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

FOREX-Yen slips, Aussie jumps as China data cheers – Reuters

AFPFOREX-Yen slips, Aussie jumps as China data cheers
Reuters
* China March PMI jumps to 11-month high * Commodity currencies shine as Chinese hard landing fears ease * Yen can resume downtrend as fiscal year-end flows fade By Ian Chua SYDNEY, April 2 (Reuters) – The safe-haven yen eased on Monday, …
Forex: EUR/USD boosted by Chinese PMI data, Euro-zone firewallNASDAQ
Forex – EUR/USD rises on healthy Chinese factory dataForex Pros
Weekend: Australian Dollar Leads Commodity Rally On 12-month Chinese …TheStreet.com

all 418 news articles »

{forex} – Forex News

Mortgage REITs Pay Out Some Juicy Dividends

Several mortgage REITs announced dividends over the past week or so, showing off some of the nicest payouts around and pointing out just why investors love these particular REITs. You can't necessarily tell how a company is doing just by its yield, however, so let's take a quick peek at how these guys have been performing lately.

REITs have been very attractive to investors tired of this low-interest-rate environment, since they are required by law to return 90% of earnings to their investors. Mortgage REITs, with their hefty annualized yields, are even more coveted. Low interest rates have been acting in these entities' favor, keeping a comfortable spread between the rates at which they can borrow and then invest funds.

Heavy-hitter Annaly Capital (NYSE: NLY  ) came through with a yield of 13%, paying a $0.55 dividend, the same rate as last quarter. Another favorite, American Capital Agency (Nasdaq: AGNC  ) recently yielded more than 15%, and Capstead Mortgage (NYSE: CMO  ) returned more than 11%. Mortgage Investment Trust (NYSE: MITT  ) yielded more than 10%, while Chimera Investment (NYSE: CIM  ) produced a whopping 15% yield.

It certainly looks as if American and Chimera are going great guns, but Chimera is the dog here, having had a rough time lately. Unlike the other four, Chimera is a hybrid REIT, investing in both government-agency mortgage securities and those that are not backed by Fannie and Freddie. The company has cut its dividend several times in the recent past and dragged its feet reporting results the last two quarters. The current climate seems to be working against Chimera's investing style and that of mREITs like Annaly, which can borrow more based on its less-risky mortgage-based securities. As fellow Fool Dan Caplinger points out, being leveraged is working quite well right now.

Fool's take
The Federal Reserve has pledged to keep interest rates low until 2014, which is good news for mREITs. Operation Twist, which tightens the spread mREITs use to make money, has just been renewed, but these trusts have been dealing with this issue for some time, and so far the program doesn't seem to have had a major impact on their business plans.

Will the government's Home Affordable Refinance Program help or hurt mREITs? Some think it is hurtful because of the prepayments that occur prior to refinancing, always a problem with mortgage securities. On the other hand, I think the new loans may very well be a boon, since with this particular pool of borrowers, chances of prepayment should be low. If you're looking for an investment that makes the most of this low-interest-rate environment, you could do worse than look at mREITs.

Mortgage REITs aren't the only game in town when it comes to income investing. I invite you to secure your future with nine rock-solid dividend stocks that our own analysts have put together in this special report. Start planning your future by grabbing your free copy here.

Where to Invest

Investments these days can be made all over the world. Through the use of computers and the internet, the investor can buy property in any country in the world (subject to local laws) and they can buy shares and stocks in any country in the world.

The main considerations are the return on their investment and the relative risk associated with currency markets and the economic conditions within the country of choice.

For the investor that is starting out in their investment life, it would be wise to keep their investment in the home country of choice. There are lots of facilities that allow investors to invest overseas using home grown investment vehicles.

Professional investors prefer a mix of local shares and property as well as a good mix of overseas shares and property investments. This can be achieved through the use of an investment advisor who has access to information on companies that have the structure in place. Units or investment shares can be bought in these companies to give exposure to all aspects of internal and external investment portfolios.

Companies that specialize in a mix of investments are well informed on potential returns and offer information for the investor to assist in decisions that will determine their choices.

The investor should evaluate several of these investment companies and the products they offer. Look at historical data and returns to judge the potential outcome.

If the investor is looking to invest in one particular growth area such as mining or the finance sector, tailor made portfolios can be put together to match the investor profile for risk and expected returns.

As always, education plays an important part in making decisions on where to invest and time should be spend educating yourself in all aspects of investing locally and overseas.

James McInnes is a professional share market trader and investment entrepreneur, with many years experience trading the Australian Share market. You can visit his site to learn about Trading Options In Australia

Apple, Google lead techs lower

MARKETWATCH FRONT PAGE

Shares of the two Silicon Valley giants fall, leading a tech-sector retreat. See full story.

All eyes on Yahoo CEO as earnings report nears

Yahoo is expected to report flat results for the first quarter, though analysts are more interested to hear from new CEO Scott Thompson, who is expected to spell out more of his vision for the troubled Web pioneer. See full story.

Services, margins to take focus in IBM report

Tech giant expected to post strong earnings and sales growth in Virginia Rometty�s first quarter as CEO See full story.

Splunk, Infoblox to lead IPOs this week

Splunk, which helps companies analyze data in real time, will lead this week�s initial public offerings with a heavy focus on business software. See full story.

Taxes: Are you paying your fair share?

Even as President Barack Obama pitches the �Buffett rule� to ensure that millionaires pay at least a 30% tax rate, some commentators are decrying the fact that about half of U.S. taxpayers don�t pay any federal income tax. But our tax system is more complex than any sound bite or simplistic headline can illustrate. See full story.

MARKETWATCH COMMENTARY

Instead of acknowledging that banks have become a part of government, we keep pretending they are private institutions, writes David Weidner. See full story.

MARKETWATCH PERSONAL FINANCE

Playing the odds that you won�t live past a certain age because of numbers in a mortality table is the wrong way to plan for retirement, say researchers. See full story.

Stocks are Off to Their Best Start Since 1998; Is it Time to Buy Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX)?

Even with the recent dip, stocks are off to their best start since 1998.

The Dow ended the first quarter at 13,212, up 8%. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index added 12% and the Nasdaq finished with a whopping nearly 19% gain.

And, if history is any guide, April should continue to bode well for stocks.

According to data from Schaffer's Investment Research, the S&P 500 has risen every April for the past five years.

In all, the index has returned an average of 4.5% for the same period, making April the best month for the market by far.

So, with all signals pointing at go, where should investors look for a jolt?

Perhaps they could take a sniff at what's brewing over at Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX).

Juiced About Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX)The Seattle-based coffee giant recently launched its first Evolution Fresh juice bar.

Located in the tony town of Bellevue, WA, not far from the company's storied headquarters, the opening has been highly anticipated, not much unlike coffee junkies waiting for their caffeine fix.

For Starbucks fans and investors, Evolution Fresh marks something of a departure.

The move is the latest venture to date from the world's largest coffee chain to branch out from simply brewing coffee. The company hopes the endeavor will boost its presence in the ever-growing and increasingly popular $50 billion health food industry.

The juice bars will sell fresh fruit and vegetable drinks, along with wraps, salads and soups. The eclectic menu will also feature an array of vegan and vegetarian offerings.

Since purchasing Evolution Juice in November for $30 million in cash, Starbucks has evolved from simply selling the healthy brews in niche markets such as Whole Foods. It now stocks shelves in local and chain grocery stores with the beverages.

Fresh fruit and vegetable infusions have exploded in recent years as many healthy and calorie-conscious consumers have embraced them.

Some use them as a meal replacement, while others imbibe as part of a "cleansing" ritual or tonic. Others simply enjoy the drinks for their taste and thirst quenching ability.

Starbucks Sinks Green Mountain Coffee RoastersWith it stellar ability to expand and be innovative, Starbucks has been especially busy of late.

Just a few weeks ago, the company introduced its own single-serve coffee machine. Called the Verismo, the K-cup-like coffeemaker will dispense a "cup-of-joe" from Starbucks' signature blends in just minutes at home or in the office.

News of the new machine sent shares of rival Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (Nasdaq: GMCR), which holds the patent on Keurig machines and the K-cup technology, spiraling downward.

Industry analysts have long been critical of shares of Green Mountain, and have questioned its steady and upward ascent. Now, Starbucks' move into Green Mountain's territory has left a distinct and bitter aftertaste. It looks like it is time for Green Mountain investors to wake up and smell the coffee.

Things at Starbucks continue to percolate as the company persists in having something always roasting. With some 17,000 stores, Starbucks is a recognizable presence on almost every street corner.

It competes with the likes of stalwarts McDonald's and Dunkin' Donuts, but Starbucks has a cult-like following of steady, loyal and "addicted" customers that appears to be unbreakable.

The java giant also realizes that man does not live on coffee alone. It is constantly developing and expanding to attract new customers and keep current clientele. CEO Howard Schultz is a truly hands-on and exacting leader.

And speaking of expanding, Starbucks just announced it has plans to triple its store count in China, believing China will become its second-largest market by 2014.

With all the tea in China, it is a bold, but achievable goal for Starbucks.

The coffee giant opened its first store in China in 1999. It currently operates more than 570 outlets in 48 Chinese cities.

According to Bloomberg News, John Culver, Starbucks' head in China and the Asia Pacific, says he sees "tremendous opportunity" in the region and that increasing its presence in the area is "most definitely" a viable way to grow.

The stock pays a modest dividend of 17 cents a quarter, and yields 1.22%. Shares are actively traded and can be volatile, but investors have been handsomely rewarded of late.

So consider waking up your sleepy portfolio with Starbucks. The iconic coffee shop may just be the jolt your portfolio needs.

Related Articles and News:

  • Money Morning: Hot Stocks: A Quick Turnaround and Global Expansion Plans Giving Starbucks Stock a Jolt
  • Money Morning: Fast Casual Restaurants Slice Off Bigger Portion of Dining Dollar
  • Money Morning: Retail Stocks: Best Buy (NYSE: BBY) Not a Good "Buy" At All

Amarin Path Clearer After FDA Approval

A day after approval of Amarin's (AMRN) AMR-101 to help treat patients with very high triglycerides, the path forward seems more clear, with many potential catalysts identified on a conference call that happened just after 7pm on July 26. This brief covers where we are now and where the stock is heading.

AMRN just secured FDA approval to sell AMR-101. This will enable the company to compete in a $1.5-$2 billion space in 2013, and also set AMRN up to file an SNDA in 2013 for the much larger indication of patients with high triglycerides—an $8-$10 billion market. Investors should be evaluating AMRN's value based on the "Anchor" trial since it was highly successful.

The company awaits NCE (new chemical entity) status, but that is more perception than material for the long-term, as AMRN's patent protection has become very robust, protecting it from generics and competitors until at least 2030. NCE ruling is due mid August, and the approved AMR-101 label along with recent patents would support a positive ruling. The company also expects favorable ruling on at least two patents in coming weeks, one of which is a method of use and could add significant value to the stock.

More important to consider, the 7/26 conference call revealed some new information:

  • Highly differentiated labeling vs. Lovaza drug—more benefits, less side effects
  • CEO very much eliminated one of the three potential pathways to launch, saying "partnership would be highly complex" and alluding to a partnership as the last resort. In my view, a partnership doesn't work here—can't do it quickly and AMRN would need to retain all ownership.
  • That leaves buyout or self launch with third party. The "third party" language was a net positive, as this means AMRN wouldn't really "go it alone".
  • There was no mention of raising additional capital, and to hire a sales force, even with third party support, would require significant cash.
  • A comment by the CEO about when the company would bring a sales force on suggested time frame for path forward decision would be within 2 months.
  • Outcomes study enrollment on track for completion by the end of 2012

As a recent Barron's articlesuggested, any big pharma company will be a player here, with multiple bids likely.

Investors should be cautioned about articles that suggest Amarin did not get the label it wanted. There are some very misleading reports out there. By contrast, it got exactly what it applied for in the NDA and even more. Here is a linkfor the recorded conference call. Remember, this go around was for an NDA for Marine indications. Indication for expanded market takes place with next filing in 2013. It is amazing what gets published without doing due diligence on a stock—the Motley Fool stories in particular put the "Fool" in Motley Fool. In fact, CNBC's Mad Money program late Friday called out the inaccurate reports out there about AMRN not scoring the right label.

Look for AMRN to track upward toward $20 after some profit taking and short-term players exit the stock. NCE and patents should help the price build to the $20 range. With buyout talks getting more serious, it is reasonable for the stock to at least double, if not triple from current levels, as the second indication should value the company over $6 billion.

Disclosure: I am long AMRN.

Wells Fargo Snaps Up 9 FAs From Morgan Stanley, Merrill

Wells Fargo headquarters in San Francisco. (Photo: AP)

Wells Fargo Advisors (WFC) said late Thursday that it had recruited nine financial advisors and one branch manager over the past few weeks with more than $6 million in yearly fees and commissions and nearly $1 billion in assets. Two teams join from Morgan Stanley, while the FAs and branch manager came to Wells from Merrill Lynch (BAC), Morgan Stanley (MS) and Raymond James (RJF).

The Brien Group joined Wells in Pittsford, N.Y., from Morgan Stanley Smith Barney with about $3.1 million in annual production and $320 million in combined assets. Advisors Robert Brien, Michael “Chip” Kazacos, Keith Baier and Christopher LaFountain now reporting to branch manager Joe Tobin.

Another team, the Bird/Barkman Group, also moved to Wells from Morgan Stanley; it has about $1.6 million in yearly fees and commissions and some $250 in assets under manager. Financial advisors Thomas Bird and Kenneth Barkman now report to market manager Bill Rogers.

In addition, Terrance Feeney moved from Morgan Stanley to Wells Fargo in San Rafael, Calif., with about $767,000 in production and $111 million assets. Ronald Winski joined from Merrill Lynch in Charlotte, N.C., with $530,000 in fees and commissions and $106 million in assets.

Former-Merrill Lynch advisor Michael Greer came to Wells Fargo in Beverly Hills, Calif., with some $183 million in assets. He’s been in the business for more than 10 years.

Finally, Tim Sheridan, most recently of Raymond James, joined Wells Fargo in New York as manager of the Wells Fargo Advisors office at 375 Park Ave. Sheridan, who has also worked for Morgan Stanley and UBS, is now managing 19 FAs with combined production of about $24 million. He reports to the New York market manager Tom Issacs.

Commercial Real Estate: Could NYT Be the New No-Spin Zone?

I've often railed against the mainstream media because of its long-running role as enabler and cheerleader for the conflicted and delusional Wall Street-Washington establishment. Nonetheless, an article in Friday's New York Times has imbued me with a bit of newfound respect for The Gray Lady.

First off, here's a sampling of what some news organizations have recently said about the commercial real estate market:

"Commercial Real Estate Has Hit Bottom: Gosin" (CNBC)

Real estate developer Barry Gosin said he thinks commercial real estate prices have hit bottom.

"We are calling a bottom," Gosin told CNBC Friday. "Our view is that the rents have priced forward, that values have come down significantly, and that some time this year prices will start to turn."

Gosin is CEO of Newmark Knight Frank, one of the largest real estate management firms in the U.S. His firm owns many properties, including the Flatiron Building, in New York.

"Commercial Market May Soon Hit Bottom" (Detroit Free Press)

Commercial real estate investors face another bleak year in 2010, but the market appears to be bottoming out nationally and in metro Detroit, a leading real estate firm said in its annual forecast Monday.

"Many have called commercial real estate 'the next shoe to drop,' but that's really an exaggeration," said Bob Bach, senior vice president and chief economist of Grubb & Ellis, which has an office in Southfield. "It implies that commercial real estate could wreak damage on the financial system equivalent to the subprime residential mortgage losses, which is highly unlikely because the value of outstanding commercial mortgages is a fraction of the value of outstanding residential mortgages.

"US Commercial Real Estate Woes Manageable, Morgan Stanley Says" (Dow Jones)

The nation's commercial real estate troubles look like a manageable problem to Morgan Stanley (MS).

A team of six analysts at the firm said Thursday that commercial real estate as a whole is "only a moderate headwind for the economy," and that property values bottomed in mid-2009.

They further predicted that the nation is headed for a "multi-staged" and "gradual" recovery, with values remaining stable this year. The positives, as Morgan Stanley sees them, are building into an attractive distressed-investment environment.

Compare those reports to the one published in Friday's Times:

"Further Slide Seen in Commercial Real Estate"

There are 920 football fields of available office space in Manhattan. More than 180 major buildings totaling $12.5 billion in value — from Columbus Tower at 1775 Broadway to the office tower 400 Madison Avenue — are in trouble, meaning in many cases they face foreclosure or bankruptcy, or have had problems making mortgage payments. Rents for commercial office space fell faster over the past two years than in any such period in the last half century.

“I have been in the business for 12 years. I have never seen it this bad,” Peter Von Der Ahe, vice president of investments for the brokerage Marcus & Millichap, said of New York City’s commercial real estate market. According to more veteran colleagues, he said, things have not been so dire since at least the early 1990s.

And that is not the most sobering assessment.

“It hasn’t hit bottom,” Mr. Von Der Ahe added.

Could The New York Times be the new no-spin zone?

Marvell Technology: A value story


I think the critical market factors that are needed to drive growth at Marvell Technology Group (MRVL) in 2012 will materialize and be solid throughout the year.

If I'm right in this assessment, I think Wall Street will wake up to the value of the story sometime during the next six to 12 months.

The company entered this fiscal year with roughly 60% market share for HDD controller chips.� And as expected, the vast Hard Disk Drive (HDD) manufacturing industry in Thailand was heavily damaged by flooding.

Still, the firm reported fiscal Q3 2012 (ended October 2011) revenue of $950.4M with non-GAAP earnings of $0.40. Both cleared the consensus estimates.

Many pundits have suggested the shortage of HDDs, which has led to notably higher HDD prices, will accelerate the adoption of Solid State Drives (SSD), which utilize NAND Flash semiconductor memory chips.

This is good news for MRVL. While I still can't quantify it, MRVL reiterated it has even higher market share in merchant SSD controller market than it has for HDD controllers.

It is important to note here SSD controller technology is very complex. MRVL began work on SSD controllers roughly eight years ago and is well prepared for this coming transition to SSD technology.

While there is no shortage of competitors, few if any can match MRVL's prowess in this technology and MRVL even noted some SSD manufacturers have switched from in-house solutions to MRVL controller technology.

My thesis for MRVL in the smartphone market remains simple. I believe MRVL will emerge not only as the leader in low-cost smartphone designs, but in reality be the primary catalyst for opening the unsubsidized $100 and lower smartphone market in emerging economies.

This is a very big deal. The big seller in emerging markets has been the feature phone. In other words, emerging markets are about where we were in the U.S. five or so years ago.
There are two primary reasons why emerging markets have trailed the U.S. in the adoption of smartphones and even today represent only a very small percentage of aggregate smartphone sales.

First is the fact emerging markets were slow to move to higher bandwidth 3G standards. But this has changed rapidly. For example, China Mobile, by far the largest wireless carrier in the world, has already installed roughly 200,000 3G TD-SCDMA towers.

This means 2012 will be the year China Mobile transitions its vast customer base from 2G to 3G. MRVL is by far the leader in chips for TD-SCDMA smartphones.

The second factor has been price. Until very recently smartphones sold for roughly $600 in these markets versus a nominal price of about $50 to $60 for feature phones.

The new smartphones using MRVL's chips sell today for only $100 unsubsidized. Going forward MRVL has a very clear roadmap that will drive this price down to about $70 in a year or so.

With MRVL doing so well the obvious question is; "Why in the heck does the stock trade for such a low valuation multiple?"

At even its recent high of $15.17 MRVL was trading at only 8.3 times the fiscal 2013 (ends January 2013) consensus plus my estimate balance sheet value (estimated balance sheet value noted below).

There are three answers for this question. One is the fact there was a "gap" in MRVL's revenue pattern caused primarily by the fact business with Research in Motion declined before MRVL was positioned to offset the decline with other designs.

Second is the fact MRVL still has high relative and absolute exposure to the HDD market.

Third is the fact MRVL has historically not been good at communicating its strategy and establishing reasonable expectations with investors.

As I see it these three factors that have weighed on MRVL's valuation are fading rapidly.

As to valuation, I believe MRVL will begin producing year-over-year revenue growth starting in fiscal Q1 2013 (the quarter ending April 2012).

Further, I believe MRVL's revenue will notably accelerate from there and for the full fiscal year 2013 (ends January 2013); MRVL will report non-GAAP earnings between $1.60 and $1.70. This is substantially above the current consensus of $1.37.

In an effort to maintain a conservative outlook for MRVL, in our valuation model I'm using a range of fiscal 2013 non-GAAP earnings that extends from the $1.37 consensus to the low side of my forecast ($1.60).

When combining this will a range of valuation multiples running from 14 to 16, and adding in the estimated balance sheet value of $3.85, this produces an estimated fair value range that runs from $23.03 to $29.45.





An investment service that delicately balances the investment ideals of Warren Buffett and the technology vision of George Gilder, Next Inning Technology Research provides subscribers with coverage on over 150 technology and semiconductor stocks.

Sign up for a free trial and start receiving real-time commentary and trade alerts, as well as access to monthly semiconductor sales analysis, regular Special Reports, and the Next Inning model portfolio. Click here to get a Risk-Free Trial to Next Inning Today!

Top Stocks For 2012-2-11-18

Crown Equity Holdings, Inc. (CRWE)

Crown Equity Holdings Inc’s selection of Core Link reflects recent diversification beyond CRWE’s original charter as a provider of services and knowledge to small business owners taking their own companies public. In addition to these services, Crown Equity Holdings Inc has transitioned into a multifaceted media organization that publishes clients’ news online; sells advertising adjacent with its digital network targeted at a high-income audience; designs, hosts and maintains websites; produces marketing videos from concept to final product; crafts press releases and articles for maximum SEO; develops email campaigns; and forges branding campaigns to bolster client company images.

Crown Equity Holdings, Inc. together with its digital network, currently provides electronic media services specializing in online publishing, which brings together targeted audiences and advertisers. Crown Equity Holdings Inc. offers internet media-driven advertising services, which covers and connects a range of marketing specialties, as well as search engine optimization for clients interested in online media awareness.

Crown Equity Holdings Inc. (CRWE) is pleased to announce that it has entered into a joint venture to deploy VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) technology delivering voice, video and data services to residential and commercial customers. The joint venture company is Crown Tele Services Inc. which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crown Equity Holdings Inc.

Commenting on the joint venture, Kenneth Bosket, President of Crown Equity Holdings Inc., said: “We are excited to deliver VoIP communications solutions specifically designed to meet the business and residential market needs with Mr. Kumar who has extensive experience in this fast-growing global market.”

As the world is becoming smarter and more efficient people across the globe have started realizing the benefits of Internet Marketing. Internet has been able to penetrate all parts of the globe. Businesses and humans are not limited to a particular geography and all corners of the world are facilitating from the ease and use of Internet marketing initiatives.

There are many advantages of using Internet marketing as the modern tool and strategy to draw more customers to trigger unprecedented growth.

Internet marketing has been more effective when measured on the aspect of product meeting the eyes of an end user. One of the best aspects of an Internet Marketing campaign is that it meets the eye of the target much faster and in a concentrated way. You can manage your leads and convert them into opportunities in a faster manner too.

For more information, visit http://www.crownequityholdings.com

W&T Offshore Inc. (NYSE:WTI) announced that its Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per share, payable to the holders of the Corporation’s common shares. The dividend will be payable on September 12, 2011, to the shareholders of record on August 22, 2011.

W&T Offshore, Inc. engages in the acquisition, exploitation, exploration, and development of oil and natural gas properties primarily in the Gulf of Mexico.

SAIC, Inc. (NYSE:SAI) announced it was awarded a prime contract by Marine Corps System Command’s (MCSC) Information Systems and Infrastructure Product Group (PG10) to provide systems integration services in support of the Total Force Structure Management System (TFSMS). The single-award, follow-on contract has a four-year base period of performance and a contract value of $30 million. Work will be performed in Quantico, Va.

SAIC, Inc. scientific, engineering, systems integration, and technical services and solutions to various branches of the U.S. military, agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense, the intelligence community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Gasco Energy Inc. (AMEX:GSX) announced financial and operating results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2011. Second Quarter 2011 Financial Results: For the second quarter 2011, Gasco reported breakeven results of $0.0 million, or $0.00 per share, as compared to net income of $15.4 million, or $0.14 per share, for the same period in 2010. Included in the Q2-11 results are derivative gains of $0.3 million attributed to hedge effect. Excluding the effect of the derivative gains in Q2-11, Gasco would have posted a net loss of $0.3 million, or $0.00 per share. Net loss excluding the effect of derivative gains is a non-GAAP financial measure.

Gasco Energy, Inc. operates as a natural gas and petroleum exploitation, development, and production company.

To Beat the S&P 500, Try the Other S&P 500; Hough: For equal-weight indexing fans, "the market" is doing just fine -- and closing in on an all-time high.

Investors seeking better returns from the stock market might want to change their definition of it.

The Standard & Poor's 500-stock index -- "the market" to many investors -- must climb another 16% to top its October 2007 all-time high. But the S&P 500 Equal Weight index, which tracks the same companies, hit a new high last May and is only a few percentage points away from hitting another.

More From Jack Hough
  • Where to Get 6% Yields, With Tax Breaks
  • Tech Stocks: Safer Than You Think
  • Big Fracking Deal: The Looming Takeover Boom in Oil

Both indexes track the largest companies in America by stock market value, but the 500 index gives the largest companies more weighting. Its 10 largest companies make up nearly 20% of the index, and the percentage varies over time. In the equal weight index, the 10 largest companies consistently make up about 2% of the index.

Both indexes serve as the basis for passive mutual funds designed to track the market. Which is better? That depends on the goal.

If the goal is to maximize returns, the equal weight index has a more impressive record. Over five years through 2011, it returned 1.75% a year, versus a loss of 0.25% a year for the regular 500. And while the equal weight index was introduced only in January 2003, had it existed earlier it would have returned 10% a year over two decades through 2009, versus 8.2% for the regular 500, according to S&P research.

That's roughly the difference between turning $10,000 into $48,000 and turning it into $67,000, not adjusted for inflation, taxes or fees.

If the goal is to keep risk low, the choice is less clear. The equal weight index has a smaller average company size. That can juice returns, but small companies are generally considered riskier than large ones. A statistical measure called standard deviation, which shows how wildly prices have swung, suggests the equal weight index has been more volatile over the past five years. Not by much, however.

The 500 index tends to offer more exposure to bubbles, because it gives stocks higher weightings as they become more popular with investors. That helped it outperform the equal weight index during the 1990s dotcom stock mania but underperform it for years after the bust.

Of course, the 500 index isn't designed to maximize returns or reduce risk; it's designed to reflect the market. Whether it does so well depends upon what an investor buys. Individual stock buyers tend not to weight their stocks by company size, so for them, an equal weight index might better reflect their choices.

But the 500 remains far an away the most popular choice for indexing, with $5.6 trillion in assets tracking it, or around $800 for each person on earth. One reason funds like it is liquidity; it's easy to sop up vast sums of investor cash when the bulk of it is going to shares of the giant companies that can best absorb it.

For investors who wish to defy common practise and try equal weight investing, choices include the Rydex S&P 500 Equal Weight (RSP), an exchange-traded fund, and Invesco Equally Weighted S&P 500, an open-end fund. Favor the Rydex fund; it has yearly expenses of 0.4%, whereas "A" shares of the Invesco fund cost a maximum of 5.5% up front and 0.56% a year thereafter.

That's one downside of equal weight investing: higher fees. The cheapest 500 index funds, offered by companies like Vanguard, Fidelity and Charles Schwab, have fees of 0.1% a year or less. Another downside is more turnover. The 500 index has just 2% turnover in an ordinary year, because it simply maintains positions as companies grow larger and smaller. The equal weight index tends to have more than 20% turnover a year, because it must constantly adjust positions to keep its equal weights. More turnover keeps fees higher, and results in higher taxes. Then again, even the equal weight index has much lower turnover than most actively managed mutual funds.

Finally, if the 500 index's tendency to chase bubbles up and back is a quirk, the equal weight index has a quirk of its own. It tends to overweight sectors that have many companies and underweight ones that have fewer. For better or worse, that means that at the moment it offers more exposure than the 500 index to consumer discretionary, financial and materials companies, and less exposure to technology, staples and energy.

So far this year, the equal weight index has returned 8.9%, versus 7.1% for the 500.

2011 SMA Manager of the Year, Small Cap: The London Company

Small Cap Equity 2011 SMA Manager of the Year
The London Company
Small-Cap Core Strategy

Throughout the month of April, AdvisorOne will focus on separately managed accounts: the money manager options advisors have, the platforms through which they can gain access to those managers, how they can conduct due diligence on those managers, and how advisors are using SMAs in client portfolios.

We begin our coverage by presenting the Investment Advisor-Prima Capital seventh annual Separately Managed Account Managers of the Year. In a feature article in the April 2011 issue of Investment Advisor, seven managers in six different asset classes were chosen as "A Class Apart."

(See the complete calendar of our Special Reportfor past and upcoming coverage.)

In this article, we focus on Richmond-based The London Company’s Small-Cap Core Value strategy, winners in the small-cap equity space.

The philosophy: Viewing equity ownership in the same pragmatic manner in which a conservative, rational businessman would, if he were buying the entire company..

The portfolio: Investing in what the management team considers its best low-beta small-cap ideas, with above-average downside protection. For the portfolio, the team seeks profitable, financially stable companies that consistently generate free cash flow and high returns on unleveraged operating capital, trade at rational valuations, and are run by shareholder-oriented management.

The performance:  2010 performance (company supplied).

Strategy composite return (gross): 24.3%

Strategy composite return (net): 23.7%

Russell 2000: 26.9%

Russell 2000 Value: 24.5%

S&P 500: 15.06%

Return (net) since inception (9/99-12/10): 15.4%

Russell 2000 return since inception: 6.9%

Total firm AUM (12/31/10): $1.94 billion

Total assets in strategy: $1.48 billion (See firm’s Form ADV Part II.)

The people: Investment Advisor Editor John Sullivan spoke in March with Stephen Goddard, CFA, founder, managing director and portfolio manager, and Jonathan Moody, CFA, principal and portfolio manager. Team members include J. Wade Stinnette, Jr., portfolio manager, and J. Brian Campbell, CFA, portfolio manager.

 

Small-Cap Equity Award
The London Company
Small-Cap Core Value Strategy

“We don’t think we’re better than anyone else, we just take a rational approach to investing,” says Stephen Goddard (left), when asked to brag on himself and his firm.

Goddard, managing director and founder of The London Company, based in Richmond, Va., then gets down to basics.The firm takes positions in low beta, conservative companies that are large enough to make an impact to portfolio performance, but with a primary focus on downside protection.

“It’s far easier to determine downside risk than it is to determine the next winner,” Goddard says. “What really hurts the portfolio are the names you’re wrong about.”

The firm was founded as “a very small shop” in 1994, but soon got the attention of

 

industry consultants and today has nearly $2 billion in assets under management.

Jonathan Moody, a principal and portfolio manager with the firm, says he distills the investment process into four pieces. The first is that they go into a new investment with a long-term approach and don’t key in on short-term fluctuations.

“We don’t want to try to outguess the other 1,000 analysts on what the earnings will be for this quarter,” he says.

The second is buying in at attractive valuations, or building the portfolio “on the backs of the companies’ balance sheet.” They look at valuations in the same manner as an owner or private equity investor, and assume zero to little growth because they don’t trust the analysis coming from Wall Street.

“We’re private equity wannabes,” says Goddard. “We look to control what we can. We can’t predict the future, but the balance sheet is something real; something that’s in the here and now.”

The third piece, Moody says, is to find the appropriate investments and then weight them accordingly.

“We hate positions of 1% or less,” he says.
The last piece is ensuring tax efficiency on the part of the portfolio. Moody claims turnover is currently less than 25%.

It all sounds pretty staid and conservative. Is there anything that really sets their philosophy apart?

Yes, according to Prima. The London Company takes a somewhat unusual approach in that it seeks to determine a company’s optimal cost of capital, which it then uses to discount future cash flows. A discount of 40% or greater to the firm’s determination of intrinsic value is sought in potential “buy” candidates, thus, the product’s value bias. The firm conducts intensive research on each company which includes knowing management’s capital allocation strategies. The methodology is similar to evaluations by private buyers (Goddard’s “wannabes” comment), which can benefit returns in an environment in which private equity buyers, and mergers and acquisitions are prevalent.

According to Prima, “The small-cap strategy has been an exceptionally consistent performer on an absolute and risk-adjusted basis since its inception.”

FOREX-Fragile euro edges higher, helped by US data – Reuters

Telegraph.co.ukFOREX-Fragile euro edges higher, helped by US data
Reuters
* Euro edges higher versus softer US dollar in thin trade * Better US data underpins risk appetite into year-end * But euro rallies unlikely to last while hit by debt concerns By Neal Armstrong LONDON, Dec 23 (Reuters) – The euro edged up versus the …
WORLD FOREX: Major Currencies Quiet; Lira, Ruble GainWall Street Journal
FOREX-Euro struggles after ECB tender; more pressure eyedReuters UK
Forex � EUR/USD Falls As Market Shrugs Off Loan PackageDaily Markets
FXstreet.com -Wall Street Journal (India) -Stock Markets Review
all 2,972 news articles »

{forex} – Forex News

RIM: BGC Cuts Target To $13 On ‘Declining Trajectory’

Research in Motion (RIMM) reports fiscal Q3 results tomorrow afternoon, after the bell, and analysts are still putting together their views on the matter.

This afternoon, BGC Capital’s Colin Gillis reiterated his Sell rating on the shares, and cut his price target to $13 from $22, writing that “The company is on a declining trajectory and there is little reason to think this is going to change under the current management and with the current strategy.” He writes as well that “it is worth noting that the equity market is currently pricing RIMM to destroy value as shares are trading below its book value of $18.92 per share.”

Gillis’s main contention is that RIM has lost the high-end market for smartphones, is not set up structurally to be able to be successful in “entry level” smartphones, which is where the competition will increasingly be showing up in 2012.

As regards tomorrow’s results, Gillis’s estimate is for $5.21 billion in revenue and $1.23 in EPS for Q3, which is below the consensus $5.3 billion on the top line, but a little better than the average EPS estimate of $1.19. Pondering the question of whether RIM will offer a forecast for the current quarter, beyond what it pre-announced on December 2nd, Gillis remarks, “given the string of missed forecasts, it may be best for the company to stop that practice.”

Gillis doesn’t think the company is an acquisition target given its market cap of $7.8 billion is still “sizeable.”

RIMM shares this afternoon are down 60 cents, or almost 4%, at $14.88.

Previously: RIM: Berenberg Urges Opening of the NOC, Transparency, December 14th, 2011.

Some Recommendation To New Investors Wanting To Learn Forex Trading

Too many new dealers attempt to learn forex trading using some of the free pointers and recommendations available online.

While this could be a good technique to get an understanding of the fundamentals, it’s not necessarily the correct way to learn foreign exchange trading secrets that could help raise your gains. It may also be a quite difficult market-place to navigate without a total cognizance of the simple way to trade forex and continue to reap profits no matter whether the market is going down or up.

It is a worldwide market that makes it possible for traders to make profits without concern for whether the cost of your base currency is going down or up. The freedom for currency exchange investors to put contracts at any point of the day or night, from anywhere in the globe with a net connection also makes foreign foreign exchange trading tremendously appealing to lots of people. The foreign exchange market isn’t the same as the stock exchange. Once the values have changed, the trader can then close out the trade, switching the foreign currency back for the base currency and keeping the benefit. To make things even less complex, it’s possible to use automatic forex trading software, occasionally called foreign exchange bots, to place contracts through your trading account for you.

The robot will check and track any shifts in the values of currencies as they relate to your chosen base currency and then create signals to let you know when it’s found a probable profitable trade. This type of software often comes with a currency trading guide to help make a trading system.

It is crucial to have a clear method in place before you start trading so you will not be at the mercy of holding deals too long. forex courses can be valuable for helping any trader to find how to keep possible losses at a minimum. They are also able to help raise the possibility of selecting more winning orders.

A forex trading guide can be a superb way to hurry up your training process and give you a bigger appreciation of trading foreign currencies to earn profits. Using the data you learn in currency exchange courses can distance you from the variety of dealers who never appear to make any profits . If you really are serious about turning a trading spare time pursuit into a profitable small business that might simply earn more than any real job, then it is important to spend the time to work through foreign exchange courses and understand how a forex trading guide can become your largest profit-making tool.

Don’t spend any money on automated forex trading softwarebefore you take some time to learn about the manyforex robot out there.

Retail: Factors Spurring M&A Action

With the holiday spending season behind us, we have seen which retailers are surviving and which are thriving. Also, with holiday spending up 5% there is evidence that the economy is picking up steam and consumer confidence is on the rise. Further, the apparel segment of the industry is still highly fragmented and stock prices are still slightly undervalued across the board. These conditions are enticing for potential buyers and will fuel M&A activity. Whether an acquisitive brand is seeking synergistic gains or wants to enter a different demographic or geographic area, there are plenty of opportunities. After conducting a basic stock screen I have come up with six companies to look at and review.

Who Are the Buyers?

There are two types of M&A transactions: strategic and financial. Strategic buyers will be looking to grow revenue and cut costs. Revenue growth can be attained by expanding geographically (internationally) or more likely into a different demographic. Another growth area for retail apparel is internet sales, a retailer light in this area may look to acquire a complementary retailer with higher direct to consumer sales. A perfect example of this type of strategic purchase is Sears (SHLD) and J Crew (JCG). Although most people think of Sears as an outdated department store that sells high quality tools, it may be making a transition into branded retail apparel. It acquired Lands End in 2002 and has identified that J Crew would make a good compliment to it by expanding its demographic reach. This may be a model for other branded retailers looking to broaden their demographic coverage.

On the other hand, financial buyers will be looking for strong cash generation and steady dependable growth – but not too much of it. Due to the financial crisis many retailers have been retiring debt and decreasing fixed costs. As sales growth makes a comeback, many of these companies will experience significant bottom line growth and the financial buyers will be there ready to pounce. According to Prequin, a private equity research group, private equity firms were sitting on $437B in December and that number has been somewhat steady over the past two years. For many firms, it is getting to the point where they must put this money to work or face giving it back to investors; this will likely heat up the buyout game.

The Usual Suspects

In either case, strong brands will be a good investment. When I created my screen, I came up with names that pretty much everybody has heard of. J Crew made the list but is already a candidate so I will look at Abercrombie (ANF), Aeropostale (ARO), American Eagle (AEO), American Apparel (APP), Gap (GPS) and Urban Outfitters (URBN).

Abercrombie is overpriced to be a viable candidate for acquisition but may work for a buyer looking for a project. ANF has two segments that account for the majority of its sales, Hollister with 43% and Abercrombie with 44%. With a healthy gross margin, it is evident that its customers are willing to pay for their products; however ANF is performing poorly as an investment while looking at ROA and ROE. Also, ANF had direct to consumer sales of 8.5% in FY2009 which was 6% lower than FY 2008. Direct to consumer segment is attractive because of the high margins, but it will likely never be large portion of income because of the nature of retail apparel. However, a target of above 8.5% of sales is certainly attainable. If ANF or a buyer is willing to do some work on its operations, ANF could certainly stand to be a strong candidate. However, as it stands, I would not purchase this stock with the intent of making a gain on an acquisition.

American Eagle is in a similar position that Abercrombie is in albeit with a lower gross margin and higher net margin indicating more efficient operations. They cover some of the same demographic groups as Abercrombie. Also, nearly 12% of its sales are direct to consumer, a segment that has seen significant growth since 2005 and is continuing to grow. American Eagle is priced slightly below my price target of $16, which does not make it a candidate for a financial acquisition but it may be attractive for a strategic acquisition. For instance, American Eagle would be a good compliment to a brand like J Crew. They do not have overlapping demographics and American Eagle is a strong brand with steady sales growth. I place American Eagle on the list of potential mergers for 2011, it is nearly impossible to calculate a target price for a merger when the other party is not known since the synergistic cost savings and growth factors are not known, for that reason I have not listed a target price for a merger.

American Apparel is a great company. However it is on the rocks right now amidst a slew of corporate problems. American Apparel is unique in that its clothing is made in the USA and yet they have high gross margins, the problem lies in their executive team. Caught employing 1500 illegal workers in 2009, a class action lawsuit in summer ’10 and in December APP was accused of withholding crucial information from its auditor. Their product is superior and their customers have loyalty, but an American Apparel is not a likely candidate for a strategic M&A move. There may be some interest from an activist investor or a PE group willing to shake things up. All things said, APP is on hold for me but I am watching it very closely.

Urban Outfitters is a diversified retail apparel company. With two popular brands under its belt and e-commerce representing over 15% of its sales, it is able to reach across several demographic groups. Its diversified strategy is successful and its success is evidenced by its strong gross margin and its strong bottom line. Set that aside, URBM has seen excellent revenue growth, earnings growth and same stores growth over the past five years - Urban Outfitters is on the right track. It has the highest bottom line margin of all of the ones I have listed but it is not cheap by any measure of the word. In some way, this is evidenced by its interest in J Crew, however J Crew does not offer much in the form of strategic initiatives. I am in the camp that believes that URBN is merely attempting to glean something from J Crew by analyzing their inner workings. In all, the good is that Urban Outfitters has strong growth, good management, a strong brand and more growth opportunities. The bad is that this is already reflected in its price and that its projected growth will consume significant capital. Urban Outfitters opened around 40 stores in 2010 and is would like to continue to grow. One of its biggest constraints will be the availability of cash for capital expenditures and working capital. I ran an LBO model on it but because of its high share price and growth track, it is not a great candidate for a financial acquisition. In all, Urban Outfitters is not likely a good candidate for a strategic or financial acquisition but it may be acquisitive itself.

Aeropostale seems to have fallen out of favor amongst its customers. It still boasts high earnings which translate to high ROA and ROE but its revenue growth is on a downward trend and it had to have newsworthy promotional sales over the holidays to turn its inventory. Also, after capitalizing leases, its ROIC is about average for the industry. ARO is in a transitional period, it was hot a couple years ago but has lost momentum. Without intervention its now healthy margin will continue to slowly shrink as will its stock price. ARO is well suited for a strategic acquisition from within the industry by a group like Urban Outfitters and if its stock price continues to decline it may be a good candidate for a financial buyer. In either case, the acquirer must have the expertise and experience to enliven the brand and bring it back.

Big Bet

I say big bet because it has the largest market cap of the companies I analyzed. At almost $13B in market capitalization, Gap is the largest that I analyzed. It’s stock has dropped just under 10% in recent days after it reported a decrease in December sales when analysts were expecting an increase. Decreasing sales is nothing new for Gap, which has been experiencing issues with growth over the past three years and its stock price reflects this. The majority of Gap’s sales is divided between Old Navy, Gap, and Banana Republic, representing 40%, 41% and 17% of its sales, respectively. With these three brands Gap covers a wide demographic range. If the economy and consumer confidence does not rebound, the low price point is covered at Old Navy. If consumers see increased disposable income, it has Banana Republic to poised to reap the benefits. Gap has only 8% of its sales as direct to consumer but has identified opportunities in Canada and abroad and will seek to expand this segment in the future. Over the past f years Gap has been at work on its operational side and increased it’s gross margin by over 5%. However it needs to spend some time working on its merchandising, with its operations in order it may be time to switch quarterbacks and get a CEO more familiar with the fashion industry. Gap is not likely a candidate for strategic M&A, however I ran an LBO model on it and if Gap can post modest increases in sales next year and onward, it would be a very strong candidate for a private equity buyout (LBO max target price $30/share).

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

House Passes Ryan FY2012 Budget Plan

The House of Representatives passed by a vote of 235-193 on Friday the FY2012 spending bill put forth by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (left), R-Wis., which would cut $5.8 trillion in spending over 10 years. Four Republicans voted against the measure, while no Democrats voted for it.

The Senate, where the Democrats are the majority party, is currently in recess until May 2, and will not vote on the measure, said a spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., will put forth a FY2012 budget proposal “in the next month or so,” the spokesperson said.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement following the House vote, “The Republicans have made a major mistake in turning a debate over the budget into a debate over whether to keep or eliminate Medicare. We have the high ground on this issue, and we welcome a budget debate on these terms. The House Republicans have let Tea Party zeal get the better of them, and this vote will reverberate for a long time.”

The vote on the FY2012 budget proposal introduced by Ryan comes just a day after the House passed by a vote of 260-167 the FY2011 spending bill that was agreed to late on April 8 and prevented a government shutdown. The Senate quickly followed, voting 81-19 for the deal. The compromise budget will cut $38 billion in spending through Sept. 30 when the fiscal year ends.

President Barack Obama on Wednesday laid out what he called “a more balanced approach” than House Republicans to reduce the nation’s burgeoning deficit by proposing a budget that would reduce the deficit by $4 trillion over 12 years.

Is Howard Stern Spreading Himself Too Thin?

There's a new judge on America's Got Talent, and it's the brilliant yet polarizing Howard Stern.

Sirius XM Radio's (Nasdaq: SIRI  ) top draw made the announcement during this morning's show, as his attorney Don Buchwald brought in the contractual paperwork that will find Stern replacing departing judge Piers Morgan on the popular talent show that airs on Comcast's (Nasdaq: CMCSA  ) (Nasdaq: CMCSK  ) NBC.

This doesn't mean Stern is leaving satellite radio. He's just a year into his five-year extension with the media giant. However, the move will certainly lead many to question if the distractions and logistics of the television show that has both taped and live segments will strain his resources.

Fans of Stern's show have already noticed that he's doing fewer live shows under his Sirius XM contract extension than he did during his original five-year run and his terrestrial radio gig before that. Stern conceded this morning that the show will require him to fly around to different places throughout the year, but he says it will not interfere with his already diminished radio show's schedule. The NBC show will also move its live broadcasts from California to New York to appease Stern, and it remains to be seen how the rest of the show's cast and crew will respond to that concession.

Now I'm going to tell you why this move is brilliant -- for Sirius XM.

One of the biggest problems with Stern's move from what is now CBS (NYSE: CBS  ) six years ago was that Sirius XM remains a walled garden. If you don't have a satellite radio subscription, you just don't have legal access to Stern's show. There are plenty of places to go for bootleg airings, but the point is that even those people are fans who remember him from his shows that drew millions of terrestrial radio listeners.

Outside of the occasional talk show appearances or when he's making headlines, Stern doesn't have the same kind of access to mainstream audiences outside of those tuning in to hear him on Sirius.

This move will change that. Stern will give America's Got Talent its Simon Cowell, and I mean that as a compliment. Stern will be the blunt voice of reason. He'll be crass. He'll be edgy. Stern will also get noticed, and that's where Sirius XM wins.

A lot of younger show viewers who weren't paying attention during Stern's nationally syndicated terrestrial radio days will get to know satellite radio's biggest star. These are the same young drivers who are either fine streaming Pandora (NYSE: P  ) through their dashboards or fail to turn their Sirius knobs into the triple digits because they're only subscribing for the commercial-free music channels.

Everybody wins -- save for the poor America's Got Talent contestant who disappoints Stern.

If you want to see how the Sirius XM story plays out, add Sirius�XM�Radio to My Watchlist.

Option Profits as McDermott Bounces

McDermott International (NYSE: MDR) is an engineering and construction company that operates in three segments: Offshore Oil and Gas Construction, Government Operations, and Power Generation Systems.

MDR is scheduled to announce its Q1 2011 earnings on May 10. After its least two earnings reports MDR moved 9% and 7% respectively. This offers an opportunity for options trading investors.

MDR is gaining momentum, winning new contracts to add to its strong backlog. We have a positive outlook in the Energy sector and expect steady growth in all three of MDR�s segments.

However, the stock has pulled back nearly 10% within the last four weeks, closing April 7 at 25.73 and May 2 at 23.19.

MDR Option Trade � The May 21/24 Strangle

In this trade, the investor hopes for the stock to trade either well above the higher strike price or well below the lower strike price.

With MDR currently at $22.60, an investor could purchase the MDR May 24 Calls for $.40 and purchase the MDR May 21 Puts for $0.30 for a debit cost of $0.70.

The breakeven in MDR on the upside for this trade would be the higher strike � 24 � plus the total premium paid � $0.70 — or $24.70.

If MDR moves up, the profit potential on this trade is unlimited.

The break even on MDR on the downside is the lower strike � 21 � minus the total premium paid — $0.70 � or $20.30.

If MDR moves down, the profit potential on this trade is unlimited down to MDR trading at 0.

The maximum risk is the $0.70 premium paid for the strangle.

Stutland Equities is a premier futures and options trading company on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. Founded in 2005 and headquartered in Chicago, Stutland Equities specializes in volatility arbitrage across multiple asset classes.

By the Numbers: Solyndra’s IPO Registration

By Eric Wesoff

This year wasn't a great one for solar IPOs. Trony Solar (TRO), a Chinese developer of a-Si solar panels, is going to hold off on its IPO "until market conditions improve," while Specialized Technology Resources (STR), a maker of encapsulants for protecting solar cells in panels, went public in November but didn't get a strong reception for its stock.

And now, threatening to jump into these tepid waters is CIGS thin-film PV vendor Solyndra. And while you were Christmas shopping, we were reading this 190 page document.

There's talk in the blogosphere that this could be the beginning of a flood of greentech IPOs. Before we jump to rosy conclusions, let's take a look at some of the details in the S-1:

  • Solyndra stock symbol: SOLY
  • VC Totals: Through Oct. 3, 2009, Solyndra raised an aggregate of approximately $970 million through equity financings, including a $283 million round E and $281 million round F
  • Staffing: As of Dec. 5, 2009, Solyndra employed 747 full-time employees. 268 in research and development, 364 in manufacturing and operations, 40 in sales and marketing and 75 in G&A, while 238 contract employees are in manufacturing and operations activities.
  • Number of union employees: 0
  • Accumulated Deficit: $505 million as of Oct. 3, 2009
  • Losses: Solyndra lost $232.07 million for the fiscal year 2009, $114.13 million for the fiscal year 2007, and $27.17 million for the fiscal year 2006; the company lost $119.2 million in the first nine months of 2009
  • Revenue: $58.8 million in the first nine months of 2009 up from $6.0 million in 2008
  • Megawatts sold: 17.2 megawatts of panels in the nine months ended October 3, 2009, 1.6 megawatts for the fiscal year ended Jan. 3, 2009
  • Conversion efficiency of PV panels: ~11-14% under standard test conditions
  • Number of commercial installations: Over 100
  • Customers include Alwitra, Carlisle Syntec Incorporated, Geckologic, Phoenix Solar, Premier Solar Systems, Solar Power Inc., Sunconnex Sun System and USE Umwelt Sonne Energie; According to the prospectus, there are "framework agreements" with system integrators and roofing materials manufacturers outlining general terms for the delivery of up to 865 megawatts of its PV systems by the end 2013 (What's a framework agreement?)
  • Cost of Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Fab 2 build: $1.38 billion
  • Mentions of Solyndra's actual price per watt and LCOE: None

Principal Shareholders and Ownership Percentage:

  • Argonaut Ventures – 35.74 percent
  • CMEA Ventures VI – 6.81 percent
  • Dr. Christian Gronet – 8.06 percent
  • Madrone Partners – 11 percent
  • Redpoint Ventures – 5.94 percent
  • RockPort Capital Partners II – 7.5 percent
  • U.S. Venture Partners – 10.19 percent
  • All executive officers and directors as a group – 82.56 percent

Any event that awakens the solar and greentech IPO markets out of its torpor is welcome. But successful companies need profits or a road to profits. With no mention of Solyndra's panel price per watt and only a rough idea of its factory capex (Fab 2 is 500 megawatts at $1.38 billion = >$2 per watt, which is significantly more that c-Si or CdTe) there is not enough information to predict the success of this venture. It is all about cost in solar these days and Solyndra has not yet divulged that information.

Institutional Investors Flee Emerging Market Bond ETFs

Foreign bonds have always been one of my favorite areas for genuine diversification. Historically speaking, foreign bonds do not correlate negatively or positively with stocks.

Until recently, however, ETF investors had slim pickings. You had vehicles such as SPDR DB International Gov’t Inflation Protected (WIP) as well as SPDR Barclays International Treasury (BWX). Yet WIP and BWX experienced enormous difficulties during the U.S. subprime disaster; moreover, neither looks fit for consumption in the present-day sovereign debt crisis.

Fortunately, fund families have been introducing non-dollar and non-euro denominated bond ETFs. For those who wanted emerging market bond yields in appreciating currencies (and yes ... that included me), WisdomTree Emerging Market Local Debt (ELD) appeared to be a godsend. And in many ways, WisdomTree Asia Local Debt (ALD) may have seemed even more appealing.

Both ALD and ELD provide an income stream with capital appreciation potential. And at their inception, they were met with enormous enthusiasm. Even today, if safety-seeking were a rational process, investors should be intrigued by governments capable of paying their debts in currencies that, for the most part, are not being devalued by weak monetary/fiscal policies.

Instead, institutional investors have soured on local debt bond ETFs. Not only have the markets punished shareholders with nearly -10% in depreciation off the highs, but institutional money managers also appear to be running for the hills.

Consider the sobering “stats” from Tuesday’s session, September 27. Block trade “selling on strength” revealed that money managers dumped $200 million of WisdomTree Emerging Market Local Debt (ELD) on 11x the normal volume, erasing 15% of ELD’s assets under management. Similarly, money managers dismissed $220 million of WisdomTree Asia Local Debt (ALD) on 33x normal volume, eradicating 34% of ALD’s total asset base.

33x the normal volume? 34% asset-under-management wipeout? Anyone who believes that contagion fears are approaching containment isn’t paying attention to the exodus from emerging market bonds.

Perhaps ironically, I have not returned to developed world treasuries for years. What’s more, in complete contrast, I continue to embrace dollar-denominated emerging market debt like PowerShares Emerging Debt (PCY) as well as local currency debt (e.g., ALD, ELD). After all, even global recession forecasters would agree that emerging market central banks have ample room to cut rates.

It follows that a significant slowdown in economic growth may benefit emerging market bonds. EM central banks could lower rates, effectively boosting the price on a number of EM Bond ETFs.

Of course, if the entire globe becomes infected by the eurozone virus, all “bets” would be off. In fact, under that scenario, even gold bugs could get squashed.

Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.

SunPower Q1 In Line; Affirms Full Year Guide; Stock Slips

SunPower (SPWRA) this afternoon reported Q1 results in with with previous guidance.

The company posted revenue of $347 million, in line with the Street at $346.6 million, up from $212 million a year ago, down from $548 million in Q4 and consistent with guidance of $330 million to $350 million. Non-GAAP profits of 5 cents a share were in line with guidance; the Street had expected 8 cents.

SPWRA repeated is previous forecast for full year revenue of $2 billion to $2.25 billion and diluted EPS of $1.25 to $1.65.

SPWRA in late trading is down 59 cents, or 3.9%, to $14.70.

Impact Investing Picks Up Support Among Investors

A majority of impact investors, who seek to create positive social or environmental impact beyond financial return, are optimistic about the impact investing industry, according to a new study.

While investors believe the industry is “in its infancy and growing,” they have a positive outlook, and plan to invest almost $4 billion over the next year. Moreover, they expect that impact investments will compose 5% to 10% of portfolios over the next 10 years.

J.P. Morgan and the Global Impact Investing Network earlier this month released Insight into the Impact Investment Market, which highlights 52 impact investors’ perspectives on the state of the industry, as well as data analysis on more than 2,200 of their portfolio investments.

The analysis relied on data collected by the GIIN, a nonprofit organization. Supporting the findings of a 2010 report that included similar data gathered by the GIIN, impact investors’ expectations for financial returns range from concessionary to market-beating, indicating there is room in the market for a wide range of performance.

The report also identifies opportunities and challenges in the impact investing industry:

  • Investors’ use of third-party systems for impact measurement has increased by 10% since 2010, and 65% of survey respondents are aligned with the GIIN’s Impact Reporting and Investment Standards.
  • Respondents believe that the top challenge to industry growth is lack of a track record of successful investments.
  • The biggest risks are illiquidity and uncertainty around financial returns.

Increased government activity and infrastructure development are helping to address these challenges, improving market information and promoting growth, according to the report.

Coca-Cola’s Not the One — Dr. Pepper Is

The world�s largest beverage company, Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO), announced�second-quarter earnings on Oct. 18. Wall Street generally liked what it heard, but the stock went sideways. Not everyone is drinking up Coca-Cola�s story. UBS lowered its price target from $78 to $73 because of currency concerns. If UBS is correct, investors can expect a total return of 13% over the next 12 months. That�s not bad, but you can do better. My recommendation is to sell Coke and buy Dr. Pepper Snapple Group (NYSE:DPS). Here�s why.

No Longer Cheap

Coke�s 2012 earnings per share estimate is $4.19. Its closing stock price on Oct. 19 was $67.03, which gives it a forward P/E of 16. The S&P 500�s 2012 earnings estimate is $104.78 and its closing price on Oct. 19 was 1209.88. Its forward P/E is 11.5. According to Fortune�s November issue,�Coke�s stock historically trades at a 20% premium to the index. At present, it�s at a 39% premium, or double the norm.

Investors have pushed its stock well beyond its limits, rationalizing that emerging markets will keep the earnings engine fired up and moving forward. If so, then why the lower earnings estimate by UBS? In the third quarter, Coke�s operating profit on a comparable basis was up 21% to $3 billion with 30% of its increase from the currency exchange. UBS obviously feels the U.S. dollar is going to hold its own in 2012, or at least remain somewhat neutral.

I have no opinion on the subject, but certainly if there were no currency gains, Coca-Cola�s operating profit in Q3 would have been $149 million, or six cents per share lower. This amount in the grand scheme of things is immaterial, but it does beg the question why defensive investors would continue to support a stock whose valuation has gotten a little frothy by historic standards.

Leverage Ratio

When Coke acquired�the North American operations of Coca-Cola Enterprises (NYSE:CCE) for $12.3 billion last October, it assumed control of a business with 2009 revenues of $15.1 billion and operating income of $1.1 billion. It was all part of Vision 2020,�its plan to create value and make a difference. Upon purchasing its North American bottling operations, it consolidated all five North American business units into Coca-Cola Refreshments USA. The acquisition itself made sense. It never seemed right that a company so steeped in America tradition wouldn�t own all of the plants where it makes its products. However, the deal came with a price tag, and I�m not talking about the purchase price. I�m referring to the assumption of debt.

KO�s balance sheet took on $8.9 billion as part of the deal, which upped its risk level considerably. Not so much that one needs to worry about it going out of business, but enough to make conservative investors like the late Ben Graham sit up and take notice. Prior to the deal, its long-term debt was $5.1 billion. Afterward, it was $15.3 billion or three times its previous level. Graham would pass on any company whose financial leverage ratio was higher than two. Coke�s ratio was 1.92 before the deal, 2.33 after and 2.44 as of the third quarter. Certainly, times have changed since Graham came up with this rule back in the 1970s, but it should give pause to conservative investors who believe that if it�s good enough for Warren Buffett, it�s good enough for me. Times do change. Coca-Cola is no longer the risk-free investment investors think it is.

PepsiCo

Coca-Cola and PepsiCo (NYSE:PEP) have fought the cola wars since the beginning of time it seems. Whether you�re talking about beverages or stocks, each camp has its supporters. But what about poor old Dr. Pepper Snapple? Who loves it?

Investors passing on Coke but still interested in the nonalcoholic beverage industry are turning to the good doctor instead of its longtime rival. How do I know this? I don�t. However, DPS stock is beating the stuffing out of PEP year-to-date, and over a three-year period Dr. Pepper has a commanding 17% lead on an annualized basis.

There�s no question Pepsi is losing the battle for the hearts of investors. Yes, it�s a much bigger company, but the truth is Pepsi has become a bore, seeking the approval of the health and wellness crowd.�Meanwhile, over at Dr. Pepper, it�s taking free cash flow and reinvesting in its business. Canada Dry, a brand close to the hearts of most Canadians but largely overlooked in the U.S., is going into expansion mode — just one example of the great decisions being made down in Plano, Texas, where the company is headquartered.

At the end of the day, Dr. Pepper has such an incredible number of strong brands that Coke and Pepsi were willing to pay $1.6 billion in 2009-10 to distribute its products in the U.S. When the time is right, it will take its show on the road outside North America, and Coke and Pepsi will be right there with checkbooks in hand. Bob Olstein, manager of the Olstein All Cap Value Fund, suggests Dr. Pepper�s free cash flow per share could be $3.50 by 2014. DPS stock currently trades at eight times its trailing 12-month free cash flow per share compared to 55 times for PEP and 70 times for KO.

Titanic artifacts set to go up for auction

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The owner of more than 5,000 artifacts recovered from the Titanic intends to auction them off in April on the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the famous ship.

But don't expect to be able to bid on any one item from the ship. The artifacts will only be sold as a single lot, according to a filing by Premier Exhibitions (PRXI), an Atlanta-based company that now exhibits the artifacts at various locations around the world.

Premier Exhibitions, the owner of the artifacts which disclosed the sale plans in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, was not available for comment Thursday. Its New York auction house, Guernsey's, did not have a comment.

The filing from Premier said that the collection had an appraised value in 2007 of $189 million. It said it has added to its collection since that time.

Gorgeous, ultra-rare cars for sale

It said if acceptable bidders are not identified by April 1, the auction will be canceled. Results of the auction are due to be announced April 15, the anniversary of the ship's sinking.

Expeditions to the wreck site in 1987, 1993, 1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2004 and 2010 recovered the artifacts in the collection. 

Sprott Money: The Price of Silver Could Explode

Sprott Money executives Eric Sprott (chairman) and Larisa Sprott (president), sing the praises of the "poor man's gold" in this exclusive interview with The Gold Report. "All the data supports the thesis that silver is undervalued," says Eric—who serves as chairman of Sprott Inc., as well as CEO, CIO and senior portfolio manager of Sprott Asset Management LP. "We'll certainly see a three-digit price," he adds. Larisa explains how the company's business model differs from others in the space and reveals plans to open Sprott Money USA within the year.

The Gold Report: Your Markets at a Glance commentary last November said it seemed unlikely that silver would stay under $30 for long. Four months later, the spot price is about $35. Are you surprised by how quickly your prediction came true?

Eric Sprott: Not really. Based on fundamental evidence, technical evidence and other things going on in the markets, I thought silver would be explosive this year. I've probably fallen a little short of my targets, but I think it's going higher. Silver doesn't have to hit $50 for everyone who's involved with it to make outsized returns, but I thought it could reach $50 within the first half of this year. All the data supports the thesis that silver is undervalued.

TGR: Are you seeing $50 as a top price, or a new baseline?

ES: Lots of things may happen in the short term that have no bearing on the long term. Silver now trades at a price ratio of about 40:1 to gold. In other words, it takes 40 ounces of silver price to equal one ounce of gold. The historical ratio is more like 16:1. My view is that we will go back to 16:1 within two to five years. To put that in perspective, a $1,600 gold price would imply $100 for silver. I happen to believe that gold will go much higher than $1,600; therefore, given time and letting this ratio play out, I think we'll certainly see a three-digit price for silver.

TGR: So, $50 may even become the floor.

ES: It's a step on the way. It may come faster or it may take a little longer; but when it happens, silver will outperform gold 3:1. That's a shockingly large difference and good reason to get a little more involved in silver.

TGR: You've said that silver will be this decade's gold.

ES: We assembled the gold articles we wrote over the last decade into a compendium called Gold the Investment of the Decade and these are also archived and available on our website. Now that we're in the second year of another decade, I'd say silver will be the investment of this decade. Gold essentially blew everything away in the last decade. There was no contest whatsoever with any currency or stock market. I think we'll all look back 10 years from now and say silver was the investment of this decade, because it might triple the performance of gold—and I think gold will continue to outperform all other currencies and stock markets. So I think silver's really an area where people should focus very heavily.

TGR: This performance you're describing can't be based primarily on manufacturing demand. How much do you anticipate in the way of investment demand?

ES: There are two parts to the silver story. One is industrial demand and one is investment demand. Industrial demand has been quite strong, but the thing that's been very unusual in the last year or two has been the marked increase in investment demand. There are many ways of viewing investment demand, and it's obvious we're going to experience some serious growth here. Judging from the data points that we look at, and as Larisa would mention, when we look at our sales of gold and silver bullion, we're actually selling about five times more dollars of silver than we are dollars of gold. That means we're selling 200 times more silver bullion than gold bullion. The U.S. Mint is selling as many dollars of silver coins as dollars of gold coins. GoldMoney.com, an online precious metals bank, also has sales of silver and gold that are about equal.

I want to emphasize that we're dealing with the flow of money here. The price difference is 40:1; but with that kind of money flowing into this commodity versus that commodity, you also have to look at the availability of one versus the other. In this case, believe it or not, that's 1:87—there's $1 of silver available in the world for every $87 worth of gold. The number of coins is explosively larger than the dollar figure. Something has to give when you have the same amount of money going into two products that are priced 40:1.

TGR: Perhaps Larisa could tell us a little bit about what's happening with Sprott Money, including a comparison to other precious metal investment alternatives.

Larisa Sprott: Sprott Money buys and sells gold and silver bullion, which includes coins, bars and wafers. We either physically deliver it or store it. Our storage depository is located in the State of Delaware. Within the next 6–12 months, we will be opening a facility in Canada.

Precious metal investment alternatives include exchange traded funds (ETFs), certificates and trusts; for instance, iShares is listed on an exchange—you get a piece of paper saying you own the commodity, but you don't have access to it. As my father mentioned, GoldMoney offers gold holdings, whereas Sprott Money allows you product choice and physical delivery of the gold and silver.

TGR: If you choose to have it delivered.

LS: I'd venture to say that 90% of our clients have their gold and silver delivered to them. They store it in a bank vault or at home—they have the peace of mind of knowing where it is. And 10% of our clients choose to store it in our depository.

TGR: And you're thinking about adding a storage facility in Canada, so there would be a choice?

LS: There's been huge demand from both Canadian and American clients to store in Canada. The impression I get is that they fear that what happened back in 1933, when the U.S. government seized the gold in people's safe deposit boxes, could happen again. So, clients might feel safer or more confident storing in Canada.

TGR: Would an additional value to an American investor storing bullion in Canada be the ability to convert it into Canadian dollars?

LS: Yes, and that's a good point. Anything we sell to clients, we will buy back.

ES: We can deal in either Canadian or U.S. currency.

TGR: At this point, are your customers Americans or Canadians primarily?

LS: About 70% Canadian, 30% American. That's a good segue actually, because in the next six months, we're going to open Sprott Money USA with an office in New York City to break into the U.S. market a bit more.

TGR: Regardless of where these metals are stored, the common view is to hold them in your portfolio as insurance against economic or currency crisis. Eric, you've recommended that Sprott clients hold 60%–70% of their net worth in precious metals, whether in vehicles such as Sprott Money or another. Because that proportion seems higher than what's appropriate for insurance purposes, to what extent do you look at precious metals as investments versus insurance?

ES: It's a bit of a semantic argument in a way, but I guess I would start with the view that I have a large distrust of the financial system. I really worry that we could have some kind of collapse. It sounds extreme to say, but we nearly had one in '08 and we nearly had one Europe last year. We still live in a very over-levered financial system. The banking issues just don't seem to go away. We bail out Iceland or Ireland or Greece, and now we've got to bail out Egypt or Tunisia or wherever else is going to have some fiscal difficulties. Ultimately, I just don't think there's enough tangible support for these systems when people want to extricate themselves and take their money out of the banks.

Unfortunately, bankers can't get rid of the asset on the other side of their balance sheet. So I think people will realize sooner or later that having their assets in physical metal is better than a bank deposit. I say that on a universal basis. To get back to whether it's insurance or an investment, I certainly can look at it as insurance because it's the one asset that should maintain its purchasing power. In some kind of financial collapse, all assets other than real assets will go down in value, so in that sense it's insurance.

It's also relatively proven to be an aggressive investment. Gold's gone up for 11 years; I think it's 17% a year and silver's gone up even more. I think it's all due to the debasement of the currencies and it's relative to the currencies. So I think it's both. I don't have any trouble investing on behalf of our clients to the tune of 70% to 80% in precious metals. We've had a very high weighting in those areas for a long time. Of course, it has been the right place to be—and I think it will continue to be the right place to be.

TGR: The silver market is so small it lends itself to being held down artificially. What measures might free up the market movement?

ES: As you probably know, all sort of lawsuits accused HSBC (HBC) and JP Morgan (JPM) of manipulating the price of silver in 2008 when it went down. In that situation, quite frankly, I was the most surprised and disappointed person in the world to see that in the middle of a financial collapse, the price of silver—and even gold—didn't rally. It seemed so unlikely that that should've happened. In my mind, that consequentially suggested forces might have been at work that weren't normal in those markets. But the manipulation will end, if there was manipulation. I'll explain why.

On commodity exchanges, the majority of transactions never settle in physical delivery. Just as an example, of the 800 million ounces (Moz.) of silver produced in a year, there are days when the commodities markets will trade 500 Moz. Well, obviously, nobody is settling this stuff because you can't have an 800 Moz. annual market and trade 500 Moz./day. These are just people pressing buttons on computers—you know with their algorithms or whatever—but they're not taking physical delivery. Manipulation takes place when a person who has more money than another person can drive the price of a product up or down, and it's easy to manipulate a market wherein all you need is fiat currency.

Manipulation will end when enough people say, "You know what? I'll take delivery of that product." I think that's what's happening in silver. More and more people are taking delivery. The dealers who are short something like 400–500 Moz. have like 42 Moz. in storage. Our organization alone owns more than 42 million ounces. That's not a lot of silver to cover a short bet of 400–500 million ounces. With every delivery period, those inventories keep going down. They're going to go down to the point where everyone realizes there is no silver left. As a matter of fact, for all intents and purposes, I think there might be no silver available today, as some mints are no longer taking silver coin orders because they just can't provide them. So, it's obvious to me that this supposed silver inventory doesn't exist anymore and that ends the manipulation.

LS: Speaking of inventories, I'd like to rewind a bit and make a point. There are so many competitors out there, but what sets Sprott Money apart from all of them is that our business model is a lot different in that we don't sell what we don't have in stock. I've heard stories from clients who say they've placed orders with our competitors and had to wait six months for delivery. Sprott Money has reserves and a lot in stock.

TGR: Currently, the aboveground silver remaining is somewhere around one billion ounces. At $35/oz., that's $35 billion for the entire sector—and seven entities hold 50% of it at this time. That seems so concentrated that these entities could manipulate the price, as the Hunt Brothers did back in the '70s.

ES: Most of those entities represent an agglomeration of individuals' interests; for example, I don't know how many accounts GoldMoney has, but it would all be in individual accounts. In the case of our Silver Trust, Sprott Physical Silver Trust (NYSE: PSLV), it's whatever money we can raise from various sources that enable us to go and buy the 22 Moz. we bought. I don't know how many shareholders it has, but it trades millions and millions and millions of shares a day. So, really none of these entities are organizations doing anything—they are groups of investors acting through various vehicles. I don't think anybody's tried to corner the market here.

TGR: So, we have far more investors in the silver sector than in previous decades.

ES: Absolutely. I think the phrase that probably captures silver's behavior, to which it's always been referred, is "poor man's gold." I think those who haven't bought gold are, to some extent, seeking refuge in silver. But anybody who's been a student of the silver market, as I myself might qualify, realizes we have a very tight situation here. And as this momentum builds to participate in the silver market, the shorts are just going to get overrun and the price could get excessively explosive.

TGR: Explosive silver prices could bode well for companies in that space, too. Could we segue to the participation in the silver market through equities, mining companies that have silver assets?

ES: We do own a lot of silver shares, as well as gold mining shares. We must own 40 or so different silver stocks. For the purpose of this discussion, I'll focus in on bigger vehicles available to the public at large. They're way more liquid and we don't have a strategic position in them. Relative to gold, there aren't a lot of silver vehicles, but we continue to like stocks, such as Silver Wheaton Corp. (NYSE:SLW), First Majestic Silver Corp. (NYSE:AG) and Hecla Mining Co. (NYSE:HL). On a little lesser scale, Bear Creek Mining Corp. (BCEKF.PK) and on a really lesser scale is Aurcana Corporation. With some of the smaller companies, we have strategic positions like 10% or 20% and I don't want to be pushing our own book here.

TGR: Most of the stocks you mentioned have assets located in either Mexico or Idaho—areas where Sprott portfolio managers seem comfortable in terms of the companies' ability to continue growing and performing.

ES: There's no doubt about a comfort level with operations in North or Central America, but we also have investments in Peru—where Bear Creek Mining is focused—and Argentina. We have no particular issues with those areas. The market, of course, always discounts whatever country it is—whether it be China, Russia, Kurdistan, the Congo or wherever—based on the political risk there. Typically, it's built into the stock price and sometimes at a deeper discount than the situation warrants. As a result, some opportunities to make investments in places away from North and Central America can pay off.

TGR: Suppose an investor wants to take $100,000 from his nest egg and put it into precious metals because he's nervous about currency markets. Would you recommend putting 70%–80% of that into bullion and the other 20%–25% in mining equities? Or, would you suggest diversifying outside of the precious metals arena?

ES: Just to clarify, I'm not recommending that people have 80% of their money in physical (though I can tell you I don't see any problem with that). When I say we have 80% invested in PMs, the physical component is 30%–35% and the stock component 45%–50%. That's the way we have played it.

As a portfolio manager, of course we want to get a little more action out of the shares than we can get out of precious metals because of the leverage factor. I'm personally invested at that rate, I invest for clients at that rate and I think it's the wise thing to do. I'm not a great believer in diversification for the sake of diversification. Make a stand on what you believe is going to happen and participate in it. Just trust that you're going to be right. If you're going to be right, you'll get an outsized return. So, that's our call and we're sticking with it. It's proven very rewarding over the last decade. And of course, it's been very rewarding to be in silver in this decade—it's been phenomenal. Maybe I should've had 100% of my money in silver.

TGR: Given that silver's the play of the decade, is your organization shifting from gold equities into silver equities more heavily?

ES: Since the end of '08, I've been selling gold bullion. Initially, it was to buy gold shares because the gold shares got absolutely massacred in '08. As the year wore on and into 2010, I got more and more fascinated by silver equities, so I've also been selling gold bullion to buy silver equities. I haven't yet sold silver bullion to buy silver equities, which may be the next thing I do—again, because the equities are a little more levered. Obviously, silver on its own has had superior performance, particularly in the last nine months. It's been a phenomenal performer. Mind you, the silver stocks have way outperformed it, so we'll see going forward.

TGR: It's great to understand your rationale. Thank both of you so much for your time and insights.

Eric Sprott is chairman of Sprott Inc., CEO, CIO and senior portfolio manager of Sprott Asset Management LP and chairman of Sprott Money Ltd. He has accumulated more than 40 years of experience in the investment industry. After earning his designation as a chartered accountant, he entered the investment industry as a research analyst at Merrill Lynch. In 1981, he founded Sprott Securities. After establishing Sprott Asset Management Inc. as a separate entity in December 2001, Eric divested his entire ownership of Sprott Securities to its employees. Eric has been stunningly accurate in his predictions, including foreseeing the current financial crisis. He chronicled the dangers of excessive leverage and the bubbles the Fed was creating, while correctly forecasting the tragic collapse of the housing and financial markets in 2008. Eric's predictions on the state of the North American financial markets, as well as macroeconomic analysis have been presented in Markets at a Glance, a monthly investment strategy newsletter.

Larisa Sprott joined Sprott Money Ltd. in the role of president in December 2009. As one of Canada's largest owners of gold and silver bullion, the company's goal is to facilitate ownership of precious metals to the general public. Larisa has more than 15 years of experience in the financial industry, having worked at Sprott Securities Inc. (now Cormark Securities) first as an office administrator in the Vancouver office, followed by roles in both research and corporate finance at Toronto headquarters. Larisa then spent five years with Sprott Asset Management in the capacity of client services, sales and marketing. In November 2007, she became an investment advisor responsible for servicing and managing high net-worth clients.


Disclosure: 1) Karen Roche and Sally Lowder of The Gold Report conducted this interview. They personally and/or their families own the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
2) The following company mentioned in the interview is a sponsor of The Gold Report: None.
3) Eric Sprott: I personally and/or my family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: Sprott Physical Silver Trust. I personally and/or my family am paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
4) Larisa Sprott: I personally and/or my family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: Sprott Physical Silver Trust. I personally and/or my family am paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.