Euro Area Crisis: Is Control About to Be Lost?

We have mentioned the risks Italy poses to the euro area in the past, but the markets proceeded to ignore both Italy and Spain for quite some time, by compartmentalizing them into the "not as risky as the GIP trio" drawer (GIP=Greece, Ireland and Portugal). There was thus little reason to dwell on it too much, but it was always clear to us that the topic would eventually make a comeback. As we have frequently mentioned, it has always been our belief that contagion would rear its ugly head again at some point.

In early July 2010 we posted Faith In The Impossible, where we inter alia discussed the situation of Italy in a paragraph with the title "Italy is quietly lying in wait." It appears it is no longer so quiet.

In late May this year we posted Et Tu, Italy?, following an announcement by the rating agencies that Italy's credit outlook was to be moved from stable to negative. The main worry with regards to a possible downgrade of Italy's government debt relates of course – as always – to the banking system. Italy sports the second highest public debt-to-GDP ratio in the euro area at 120% and the exposure of the euro area banking system (chart) – and especially the Italian banks themselves – to the €1.2 trillion large Italian government debt mountain is commensurately staggering.

The markets have hitherto treated Italy's public debt situation as slightly dubious, but not outright alarming. As we have noted before, there has been a perception that due to Italy's high personal savings rate and the large proportion of Italian government debt held domestically, Italy could be seen as a kind of European version of Japan, able to amass a large amount of government debt without having to fear ill effects. It seems now that the markets are in the process of reassessing this particular notion. Both CDS prices and the yields on Italian government bonds have recently sprinted higher, with the latter only a smidgen away from breaking out to new highs for the move.

[Click all to enlarge]

Italy's 10-year government bond yield ends the week at 4.977%, perilously close to breaking out from the sideways consolidation that has pertained for most of this year. Spain's government bond yields have just broken out from a similar consolidation formation.

What is undeniable is that Italy's stock market has been mired in a bear trend for quite some time. The Milan stock exchange index (FTSE-MIB) has made its post 2008 crash rebound peak in October of 2009 and has gently drifted sideways/lower ever since.

The Milan Stock Exchange Index has been a "bear market leader" since 2007. It peaked in May of 2007 – well ahead of the S&P 500 Index. It made its post-crash rebound high back in October of 2009.

The MIB has been in a relentless downtrend relative to the S&P 500.

The MIB has also just plummeted to a new low vs. gold.

Last Friday, the Italian stock exchange sported a solid gain of just over 307 points two hours into the trading day. European markets took their lead from a strong day in Asian stock markets following remarks by China's premier Wen Jiabao that "China is winning the war on inflation," which market participants evidently took as a hint that the recent tightening of monetary policy in China may be close to ending. An unexpected small gain in the German business confidence index (IFO index) reported early on Friday also boosted sentiment at the beginning of the trading session somewhat.

It looked as though a risk-on day was in the works, which means sell the dollar, and buy the euro, stocks and commodities. However, it was not to be. At about 11:00 a.m. Central European time, a rumor surfaced that Italian banks would have to raise more equity in the wake of the most recent European stress test exercise and that a major credit rating agency was preparing to downgrade Italy's sovereign debt.

Late on Thursday, Moody's had warned that 16 Italian banks faced a possible credit rating downgrade in the event of a downgrade of Italy's sovereign debt, coupled with a reassessment of the willingness of governments to support the debt of financial companies. This was initially ignored, but when the above mentioned rumors started on Friday morning, the remarks by Moody's no doubt lent additional credence to them. Italian bank stocks literally crashed within minutes – with many falling by the 10% daily threshold after which trading halts are imposed by the Milan exchange.

The weakness in Italian bank stocks then quickly spread across Europe, with UK banks especially hard hit, not least because BoE chairman Marvyn King muttered darkly about the risks the euro area debt crisis poses to financial stability in the UK – echoing Jean-Claude Trichet's "red alert" remarks made on Wednesday in connection with the euro area's banking system.

As Bloomberg reported:

A gauge of banks was the worst performing industry in the Stoxx 600 this week, sliding 4.3 percent to the lowest level since July 2009.

Popolare Milano, the oldest Italian cooperative bank, plunged 15 percent to the lowest since at least 1989. Monte Paschi slid 11 percent, the biggest drop in more than a year.

Moody’s Investors Service said on June 23 that it may downgrade 13 Italian banks because they would be vulnerable were the government’s credit rating to be cut. The ratings company last week warned that Italy’s credit ratings may be trimmed because of slowing economic growth and the potential for the sovereign crisis to drive the country’s borrowing costs higher.

European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet on June 22 said danger signals for financial stability in the euro area are flashing red as the debt crisis threatens to infect banks.

Lloyds Banking Group Plc, Britain’s biggest mortgage lender, fell 10 percent and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc decreased 12 percent.

The euro-area debt crisis poses the biggest risk to the stability of the U.K. financial system and banks should build up capital buffers when earnings are strong, Bank of England Governor Mervyn King said in London yesterday.

The MIB on Friday – after initially gaining 307 points to an intraday high of 19,775.67 points, the market suffers a steep decline, plunging to an intraday low of 19,067.84 points as Italian banks stocks crash. Following a trading halt in the worst hit bank stocks, the market attempts a recovery, but then drifts back to near the lows of the day.

While the credit markets have heretofore given Italy a pass – at least relatively speaking, compared to the relentless plunge in the bonds of the 'GIP' trio and the huge rise in CDS spreads on their debt – the Italian crisis has always been evident in the action of the stocks of the country's major banks. Friday's plunge was merely the exclamation point on what has been a relentless and utterly brutal bear market that has been in train for several years. Readers may recall the charts of Greek bank stocks we have occasionally posted in the past (a comprehensive overview can e.g. be found in Looking Into The Abyss from late April – since then, these stocks have declined even further) -- somewhat surprisingly perhaps, many Italian bank stocks don't look any better.

The share price of Unicredito, Italy's largest bank. Note that the mini-crash last Friday follows on the heels of a relentless downtrend. Just how relentless is revealed by the next chart.

A one decade chart of Unicredito shows what an enormous amount of damage stockholders have had to endure. Note that there was a huge bubble in Italian bank stocks from about 1997 to 1998, as Italy's bond yields were falling sharply in anticipation of the country's entry into the euro. The same factor that worked in the banks' favor then now works to their detriment as, Italian bond yields diverge ever more from Germany's.

The share price of Intesa Sanpaolo, Italy's second-largest bank.

Intesa Sanpaolo's share price over the past decade – only at the 2002 and 2009 bear market lows was the stock trading at a lower level than currently.

The stock price of Monte Dei Paschi di Siena bank, which was founded in 1472 – 22 years prior to the bankruptcy of the Medici Bank in 1494. In short, Monte Dei Paschi has survived many a credit crisis, including the severe busts of the late medieval period when no lender of last resort existed that could bail overextended and insolvent banks out. Judging from its stock price, the presence of a lender of last resort isn't doing much for shareholders.

The share price of Monte Dei Paschi di Siena over the past decade. Is the bank finally going to be done in after surviving for almost 540 years? Once a stock declines well over 90% from its former highs, one begins to wonder about the company's ability to survive. Note that the stock has now plummeted well below even its 2008-09 crash low.

The share price of Italy's Banco Popolare over the past year. This is a noteworthy crash – on a par with the action in the stocks of Greek banks.

Banco Popolare's share price over the past decade. This represents a decline of 94% from the 2007 high. Again, one wonders whether this one isn't close to death's door as well.

The shares of Italy's leading investment bank, Mediobanca di Credito Finanziario, which was founded by Enrico Cuccia in 1946 to help finance the post-war reconstruction of Italy's industry, have fared only slightly better than those of its commercial banking brethren.

The share price of Mediobanca di Credito Finanziario, Italy's leading investment bank, over the past year. After showing some strength until April, the shares have sold off sharply and have also suffered quite a bit in Friday's sector-wide decline.

Mediobanca's share price over the past decade – at least it still remains above both the 2002 and 2009 bear market lows, but not by much. It seems doubtful that its shareholders are very happy.

Regional Italian banks are similarly stricken as the next chart reveals.

Banca Popolare dell'Ertruria e del Lazio over the past year – another bank stock closing in on strong support at zero

A ten year chart of Banca Popolare dell'Ertruria e del Lazio's stock – click for higher resolution.

Not to put too fine a point on it, Italian bank stocks are a horror show. While bank stocks haven't done particularly well all over the Western world following the 2008 mortgage credit-related crisis, these stocks are in a class of their own, with a 1929-1932 type collapse under their belt – nota bene in nominal terms. In real money, i.e., gold terms, it's a complete wipe-out. It is understandable that bank stocks in Greece have suffered a collapse of roughly comparable size (although ironically, they have lately slightly bounced off their multi-year lows). The market is simply extrapolating the effect that a marking to market of the Greek government debt held by Greece's banks would have on their equity. In the worst case of the Bank of Piraeus, a 50% haircut – and the haircut implied by market prices is oscillating around that figure – would wipe out its equity completely. National Bank of Greece (NYSE symbol NBG) would be left with less than 3% of tangible equity. With CDS on Greek government debt implying a close to 90% default probability, the sell-off in Greek bank stocks can be easily explained. It is not quite clear why the market has adopted an almost similarly negative view of Italy's banks. It could of course mean that the panic has gone too far and a tradable rebound is soon in the cards. However it may also mean that the market has a well-founded and growing concern about the fate awaiting Italian government debt that these banks hold such ample amounts of. Across the euro area, banks hold about €1 trillion of Italy's sovereign debt, with Italian banks the biggest holders by far. The rise in yields to date has already produced a sizable 'paper loss' on these bond holdings, but it is for now still in the realm of the tolerable.

Obviously, it would not do if contagion were to continue spreading in the direction of Italy and Spain.

Italy's current account deficit.

Italy's public debt as a percentage of GDP.

Italy's external debt in US dollar terms.

A Lack of Containment

Numerous observers have in recent weeks raised the specter of the Lehman failure as a model for what to expect in the event of an official Greek default. It may well make even bigger waves. In the course of this coming week the Greek parliament will vote on the new austerity package, the enactment of which is a precondition for the next disbursement of bailout funds. However, as anyone engaging in a spot of mental arithmetic can probably tell right away, all these antics will likely prove to be for naught in the end. As we have pointed out before, when a fractionally reserved banking system expands credit and money under what is essentially a fixed exchange rate regime, a bust will have severe consequences.

In the case of currency pegs, the peg usually goes. This is not possible for members of the euro area – in fact, there is not even an agreed upon procedure for leaving the euro, as the possibility was never considered. Moreover, the nations that have experienced the sharpest interest rate declines following their adoption of the common currency – back when rate convergence was still the order of the day – are precisely the nations that have either gone through the biggest property bubbles and/or have seen a sharp rise in government spending, as the cost of government debt declined and the artificial credit-induced boom filled government coffers with fictitious revenues from taxes on fictitious profits.

Prior to becoming part of the euro area, these nations would have reacted to an economic bust by devaluing their currencies through printing money. This would tend to lower the value of their existing debt. Moreover, since their interest rates always reflected this probability by sporting a commensurately large price premium, debt expansions tended to be held somewhat in check by high rates.

For the past several months, the eurocracy's bailout agenda seemed to at least succeed in exerting a containment effect. Interest rates and CDS spreads on the GIP trio kept rising, but the "S" and "I" in the famous PIIGS acronym appeared to be decoupling. However, we always suspected that this would not work for long. This is due to several reasons, the most important ones of which in brief are:

1. While in terms of their total public debt relative to economic output and tax revenues the GIP trio is is among the worst offenders, at least Italy and Belgium are in a roughly similar league.

2. Even a relatively low public debt to GDP ratio is not a guarantee that the country concerned will be spared if it goes through the severe economic problems that follow a property bubble and uses taxpayer funds to bail out the banks. This is what did Ireland in, where the decision to bail out the senior bondholders of insolvent banks led the government into an insoluble debt trap. It also holds true for Spain, where the still fairly low total public debt is growing fast as the country remains mired in economic contraction. Both Ireland and Spain have had large inflows of capital from abroad to finance their current account deficits, i.e., they both have large exposure to foreign creditors.

3. The supranational ECB can not simply help individual nations to print their way out of fiscal trouble. It's just not doable, at least not yet.

4. The interconnectedness of banking systems in and around the euro area means that no-one is spared in case the peripheral sovereigns officially default on their debt. Note that we are saying "in and around," as the contagion effects are felt in nations neighboring the euro area as well.

A good recent example of how the failure to contain the crisis is making itself felt in at first seemingly unlikely places is provided by the action in the stocks of UK banks last week. The two worst offenders were Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) and Lloyds TSB, both banks that required vast government bailouts to survive. Last week the media prominently reported on the fact that the UK would not be required to chip in any funds in support of the latest bailout round for Greece, along with the information that the direct exposure of UK banks to Greek debt was fairly negligible at only $ 13 billion, of which about $ 4 billion are in the form of exposure to sovereign debt. However, BoE governor Mervyn King warned on Friday that these numbers understate the risk, which largely stems from the above mentioned interconnectedness of the financial system.

The Telegraph reported on this:

King made clear last week that Britain’s banking sector has a “remarkably small” exposure to Greek sovereign debt. Yet the Governor also warned that contagion can spread through financial markets, especially when there is uncertainty about the precise location of exposures.

A UK bank could have lent to a bank that itself lent to a bank that is turn was exposed to Greek sovereign risk,” King said. UK banks may only be holding a limited about of Greek debt but they are mightily exposed to French and German banks which, in turn, are among the very biggest lenders to Greece.

King’s words, and the Bank’s Financial Stability Report published last week, pay testament to the ghastly inter-connectedness, right across Europe, of sovereign insolvency and bank fragility.

Looking at the charts of UK banks, the very same idea seems to have occurred to stock market traders. After all, even if the UK banks' involvement in Greece is negligible, their involvement in Ireland is considerable – and Irish government bond yields and CDS prices have exploded in concert with the worsening Greek crisis.

The share price of RBS was in free-fall last week – it ended at the lowest level since March of 2010. Traders were evidently thinking ahead on the contagion issue.

Shares in Lloyds TSB have been falling sharply for many weeks, with the decline accelerating markedly last week.

Below you can see why Ireland remains a big worry – these charts also illustrate nicely that a low public debt to GDP ratio at the outset of the crisis proved largely irrelevant, as discussed above.

Ireland's current account deficit in millions of euro.

Ireland's annual budget deficit as a percentage of GDP.

Ireland's unemployment rate.

Ireland's total public debt as a percentage of GDP – note that the latest 2011 estimate is actually somewhat higher by now at 102%.

Ireland's external debt in US dollar terms.

Similarly, Spain's economy is beset by problems that are putting the most recent estimate of its total public debt to GDP ratio of about 67.5% into perspective. It remains uncertain how much it will in the end cost to repair the banking system – it is only clear that if Spain remains committed to recapitalizing its banks with government funds it may ultimately face a bill that significantly dents its public finances, just as has happened in Ireland's case.

Spain's current account deficit in billions of euro – it has been shrinking considerably since the beginning of the bust, but lately it has widened again due to rising commodity import costs.

Spain's annual budget deficit as a percentage of GDP – the 2011 estimate may well turn out to be too low.

Spain's unemployment rate – this documents in what sorry shape Spain's economy remains.

Spain's public debt-to-GDP ratio – it has already reached 67.5%, so the 2011 estimate is certain to increase.

Spain's total external debt in US dollar terms.

Last week was very notable in the sense that the meme that Greece can no longer be rescued no matter how much money is thrown at it seemed to gain considerable ground. In reaction to this, the financial markets were refocusing on the contagion question – with a vengeance. Both Jean-Claude Trichet and Mervyn King gave voice to their growing unease, with the latter contributing his own 2 cents, or pennies as it were, to the Greek bailout question when he noted:

"Right through this episode, from the very start,” said King, “an awful lot of people wanted to believe it was a crisis of liquidity. It wasn’t and it isn’t. It was a crisis based on solvency, not liquidity. And until we accept that, we will never solve it .... Providing liquidity, can only be used to buy time,” as King correctly observed last week. “Simply the belief, 'oh we can just lend a bit more’, will never be an answer to a problem which is essentially about solvency."

This is what everyone has probably realized by now, but the eurocracy still insists that it will be better to kick the can further down the road – even if there will at least be a certain degree of voluntary private creditor contribution this time around. A huge and apparently still underestimated problem is that the markets are not working according to the bureaucratic time table, especially when said time table is beset with uncertainties (such as, "Will the Greek parliament vote for more spending cuts and tax increases next week, or will it balk?"). The markets, as one trader put it last week, "are smelling blood."

Try putting yourself in the shoes of a large holder of Spain's or Italy's government debt. What would you do as this crisis continues to evolve? A good rule of thumb is that he who panics first gets to keep most of his money in such situations. After all there is by now a considerable body of historical evidence available with regards to the euro area's sovereign debt crisis and the damage it inflicts on the bonds of suspect governments – and none of it is particularly comforting.

As a result of all this, the eurocracy finds itself once again extremely close to a point where things could spiral out of control for good. Even if it turns out that last week's market convulsions were another short term peak in the evolving panic (so far, the crisis has moved like an upwardly slanted sine wave), it would merely postpone the moment of truth. The fundamental problem will certainly not be solved in a few week's time, but will continue to fester.

More Charts

Below is our usual collection of CDS prices (in basis points, color coded) plus euro basis swaps and government bond yields across the euro area (in a similar arrangement of color-coded four-in-one charts this time). Obviously, many markets are well beyond the complacency stage by now, although risk asset prices – with the exception of certain bank stocks (see above) – have not really broken down decisively yet. This may be based on false hopes, but it is always possible that these markets are correct in assuming that another pause in the crisis is imminent and that some sort of retracement of the recent losses is likely to occur. Nevertheless it is clear that the situation is fraught with danger at the moment.

1. CDS

Five-year CDS spreads on Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain – new highs for Portugal and Greece at 839 and 2405 basis points respectively, with both CDS on Italy's and Spain's sovereign debt still racing higher in a spirited catch-up move that is coming ever closer to negating the previous divergence.

Five-year CDS on Ireland (a retest of the recent high), France, Belgium and Japan. There was quite a big move in CDS on France's debt. At just above 90 basis points these are closing in on what can per experience be considered the upper boundary for a EU core economy.

Five-year CDS on Austria, Hungary, Croatia and Bulgaria. We're not quite sure at this point why Croatia seems to merit such a big move. The credit claims of Greek banks in Croatia amount only to $180 million, so that is probably not the reason (though this could become a problem for several other countries - see this chart).

Five-year CDS on Slovakia, Slovenia (both in a remarkable rocket-ride higher last week), Latvia and Lithuania. The Baltic nations are evidently profiting from the fact that their public debt is very low.

Five-year CDS on Romania, Poland, Estonia, and Slovakia.

Five-year CDS on Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Morocco and Turkey. The sharp move higher in CDS on Turkey's debt was especially noteworthy last week.

2. Euro Basis Swaps and Bond Yields

One-year euro basis swap – still trending in the wrong direction.

Five-year euro basis swap.

10-year government bond yields of Spain, Ireland, Portugal and Greece – note the sustained breakout in Spain's 10-year yield and new highs for both Portugal and Ireland – ironically, Greece's yields were the only ones to pull back slightly late last week.

10-year government bond yields of Austria, Italy and UK (gilts), plus the Greek two-year note. Austrian yields have been trending lower along with Germany's, UK gilts seem to reflect mostly the weakening of the UK economy, but Italy's bond yields have clearly become a contagion victim.

Lastly, here is the SPX, the SPX-gold ratio, T.R.'s proprietary VIX based volatility indicator (adjusted by gold-silver ratio) and the gold-silver ratio. All of these have lately moved in directions that are not friendly to risk assets. The gold-silver ratio appears poised to move higher.

How Fast Is the Cash at Universal Electronics?

It takes money to make money. Most investors know that, but with business media so focused on the "how much," very few investors bother to ask, "How fast?"

When judging a company's prospects, how quickly it turns cash outflows into cash inflows can be just as important as how much profit it's booking in the accounting fantasy world we call "earnings." This is one of the first metrics I check when I'm hunting for the market's best stocks. Today, we'll see how it applies to Universal Electronics (Nasdaq: UEIC  ) .

Let's break this down
In this series, we measure how swiftly a company turns cash into goods or services and back into cash. We'll use a quick, relatively foolproof tool known as the cash conversion cycle, or CCC for short.

Why does the CCC matter? The less time it takes a firm to convert outgoing cash into incoming cash, the more powerful and flexible its profit engine is. The less money tied up in inventory and accounts receivable, the more available to grow the company, pay investors, or both.

To calculate the cash conversion cycle, add days inventory outstanding to days sales outstanding, then subtract days payable outstanding. Like golf, the lower your score here, the better. The CCC figure for Universal Electronics for the trailing 12 months is 92.2.

For younger, fast-growth companies, the CCC can give you valuable insight into the sustainability of that growth. A company that's taking longer to make cash may need to tap financing to keep its momentum. For older, mature companies, the CCC can tell you how well the company is managed. Firms that begin to lose control of the CCC may be losing their clout with their suppliers (who might be demanding stricter payment terms) and customers (who might be demanding more generous terms). This can sometimes be an important signal of future distress -- one most investors are likely to miss.

In this series, I'm most interested in comparing a company's CCC to its prior performance. Here's where I believe all investors need to become trend-watchers. Sure, there may be legitimate reasons for an increase in the CCC, but all things being equal, I want to see this number stay steady or move downward over time.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Because of the seasonality in some businesses, the CCC for the TTM period may not be strictly comparable to the fiscal-year periods shown in the chart. Even the steadiest-looking businesses on an annual basis will experience some quarterly fluctuations in the CCC. To get an understanding of the usual ebb and flow at Universal Electronics, consult the quarterly-period chart below.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

On a 12-month basis, the trend at Universal Electronics looks less than great. At 92.2 days, it is 5.2 days worse than the five-year average of 87. days. The biggest contributor to that degradation was DIO, which worsened 10.4 days when compared to the five-year average.

Considering the numbers on a quarterly basis, the CCC trend at Universal Electronics looks good. At 88.6 days, it is 5.6 days better than the average of the past eight quarters. With quarterly CCC doing better than average and the latest 12-month CCC coming in worse, Universal Electronics gets a mixed review in this cash-conversion checkup.

Though the CCC can take a little work to calculate, it's definitely worth watching every quarter. You'll be better informed about potential problems, and you'll improve your odds of finding underappreciated home run stocks.

Is Universal Electronics playing the right part in the new technology revolution? Computers, mobile devices, and related services are creating huge amounts of valuable data, but only for companies that can crunch the numbers and make sense of it. Meet the leader in this field in "The Only Stock You Need To Profit From the NEW Technology Revolution." Click here for instant access to this free report.

  • Add Universal Electronics to My Watchlist.

Skechers Earnings Preview

Investors braced for a bumpy ride ahead of Skechers' (NYSE: SKX  ) earnings announcement as the company has wavered between beating and falling short of analyst predictions during the past fiscal year. The company will unveil its latest earnings on Wednesday, Feb. 15. Skechers designs, develops, markets, and distributes footwear. It also operates retail stores and an e-commerce business.

What analysts say:

  • Buy, sell, or hold?: Analysts think investors should stand pat on Skechers, with analysts unanimously rating it hold. Analysts don't like Skechers as much as competitor Brown Shoe Company overall. Two out of five analysts rate Brown Shoe Company a buy compared to zero out of five for Skechers. While analysts still rate the stock a hold, they are a little more optimistic about it compared to three months ago.
  • Revenue forecasts: On average, analysts predict $324.3 million in revenue this quarter. That would represent a decline of 28.7% from the year-ago quarter.
  • Wall Street earnings expectations: The average analyst estimate is a loss of $0.23 per share. Estimates range from a loss of $0.30 to a loss of $0.08.

What our community says:
CAPS All-Stars are solidly supporting the stock, with 96% awarding it an outperform rating. The greater community concurs with the All-Stars, as 94.4% give it a rating of outperform. Fools are impressed with Skechers and haven't been shy with their opinions lately, logging 236 posts in the past 30 days. Even with a robust four out of five stars, Skechers' CAPS rating falls a little short of the community's upbeat outlook.

Management:
Revenue has fallen for the past three quarters. The company's gross margin shrank by 3 percentage points in the last quarter. Revenue fell 25.7% while cost of sales fell 21.5% to $237 million from a year earlier.

Now, a look at how efficient management has been at running the business. Traditionally, margins represent the efficiency with which companies capture portions of sales dollars. Skechers has seen decreasing gross margins year over year for the last four quarters. Gross margins reflect the total sales revenue retained after costs. See how Skechers has been doing for the last four quarters:

Quarter

Q3

Q2

Q1

Q4

Gross Margin

42.7%

33.2%

40.6%

40.7%

Operating Margin

0.6%

(11.1%)

3.1%

0.3%

Net Margin

2%

(6.9%)

2.5%

0.7%

One final thing: If you want to keep tabs on Skechers' movements, and for more analysis on the company, make sure you add it to your Watchlist.

Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Skechers. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Earnings estimates provided by Zacks.

What American Eagle Outfitters Does With Its Cash

In the quest to find great investments, most investors focus on earnings to gauge a company's financial strength. This is a good start, but earnings can be misleading and incomplete. To get a clearer understanding of a company's ability to earn money and reward you, the shareholder, it's often better to focus on cash flow. In this series, we tear apart a company's cash flow statement to see how much money is truly being earned and, more importantly, what management is doing with that cash.

Step on up, American Eagle Outfitters (NYSE: AEO  ) .

The first step in analyzing cash flow is to look at net income. American Eagle Outfitters' net income over the last five years has been all over the place:

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Normalized Net Income $161 million $202 million $194 million $254 million $403 million

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Next, we add back in a few noncash expenses, like the depreciation of assets, and adjust net income for changes in inventory, accounts receivable, and accounts payable -- changes in cash levels that reflect a company either paying its bills, or being paid by customers. This yields a figure called "cash from operating activities" -- the amount of cash a company generates from doing everyday business.

From there, we subtract capital expenditures, or the amount a company spends acquiring or fixing physical assets. This yields one version of a figure called "free cash flow," or the true amount of cash a company has left over for its investors after doing business:

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Free Cash Flow $139 million $297 million $259 million $60 million $214 million

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Now we know how much cash American Eagle Outfitters is really pulling in each year. Next question: What is it doing with that cash?

There are two ways a company can use free cash flow to directly reward shareholders: dividends and share repurchases. Cash not returned to shareholders can be stashed in the bank, invested in other companies, or used to pay off debt.

Here's how much American Eagle Outfitters has returned to shareholders in recent years:

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Dividends $86 million $85 million $83 million $82 million $81 million
Share Repurchases $17 million $234 million -- $3 million $451 million
Total Returned to Shareholders $103 million $319 million $83 million $86 million $531 million

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

As you can see, the company has repurchased a decent amount of its own stock. That's caused shares outstanding to fall:

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Shares Outstanding (millions) 194 200 206 205 216

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Now, companies tend to be fairly poor at repurchasing their own shares, buying feverishly when shares are expensive and backing away when they're cheap. Does American Eagle Outfitters fall into this trap? Let's take a look:

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Sure enough, American Eagle bought back a lot of stock in 2007 when shares were fairly high, but none in 2009 when they plunged, only to come back with repurchases after shares rebounded. Whether this was a prudent way to save cash when it looked like the economy was about to implode, or a classic example of buying high and panicking low, is up for debate. In general, it doesn't appear management has been the most astute buyer of its own stock.

Finally, I like to look at how dividends have added to total shareholder returns:

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Shares returned -38% over the last five years, which drops to -48% without dividends -- a small boost to top off otherwise poor performance.

To gauge how well a company is doing, keep an eye on the cash. How much a company earns is not as important as how much cash is actually coming in the door, and how much cash is coming in the door isn't as important as what management actually does with that cash. Remember, you, the shareholder, own the company. Are you happy with the way management has used American Eagle Outfitters' cash? Sound off in the comment section below.

  • Add American Eagle Outfitters to�My Watchlist.

Apple: No More “I’m A Mac”/”I’m A PC” TV Commercials?

As a number of Apple news sites have pointed out, it looks like Apple (AAPL) may have made the last of those “I’m a Mac”/”I’m a PC” television ads.

At least, that’s what Justin Long says, and he should know; he’s the actor who plays the Mac, opposite John Hodgman playing the PC. Here’s an excerpt from an interview with Long published by The A.V. Club web site:

AVC: what�s the status on those Apple commercials?

JL: You know, I think they might be done. In fact, I heard from John, I think they�re going to move on. I can�t say definitively, which is sad, because not only am I going to miss doing them, but also working with John. I�ve become very close with him, and he�s one of my dearest, greatest friends. It was so much fun to go do that job, because there�s not a lot to it for me. A lot of it is just keeping myself entertained between takes, and there�s no one I�d rather do it with than John.

11 Semiconductor Stocks With Encouraging Inventory Trends

How do you analyze a company's sales trends? One idea is to look at their growth in inventory over time, compared to revenue. If revenue is growing faster than inventory, it could be a good sign.

We ran a screen on the semiconductor industry for stocks with positive trends in inventory: growth in quarterly revenue outpacing growth in quarterly inventory year-over-year. We also screened for companies with quarterly inventory decreasing as a percent of current assets.

To understand why these trends are positive, think of why the opposite trends would be negative. If revenue were growing slower than inventory, it may indicate that the company is having trouble selling its inventory - although this may just indicate inventory building or a change in sales policies.

?

Interactive Chart: Press Play to compare changes in analyst ratings over the last two years for the top six stocks mentioned below. Analyst ratings sourced from Zacks Investment Research.?

Your browser does not support iframes.

We also created a price-weighted index of the stocks mentioned below, and monitored the performance of the list relative to the S&P 500 index over the last month. To access a complete analysis of this list's recent performance, click here.

Do you think these companies are selling well? Use this list as a starting point for your own analysis.

List sorted by difference between growth in revenue and inventory.

1. Microsemi Corp. (MSCC): Engages in the design, manufacture, and marketing of analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits and semiconductors primarily in the United States, as well as in Europe and Asia. Market cap of $1.62B. MRQ revenue has increased 50.32% ($227.29M vs. $151.2M y/y) while MRQ inventory has increased 11.64% ($140.83M vs. $126.15M y/y). Inventory/current assets has decreased from 29.19% to 24.37%, comparing 13 weeks ending 2011-10-02 to 13 weeks ending 2010-10-03. The stock has had a couple of great days, gaining 6.89% over the last week.

2. LSI Corporation (LSI): Designs, develops, and markets storage and networking semiconductors and storage systems worldwide. Market cap of $3.88B. MRQ revenue has increased 20.76% ($546.91M vs. $452.88M y/y) while MRQ inventory has decreased 4.40% ($210.43M vs. $220.12M y/y). Inventory/current assets has decreased from 17.78% to 14.72%, comparing 3 months ending 2011-10-02 to 3 months ending 2010-10-03. The stock has had a good month, gaining 20.49%.

3. ASML Holding NV (ASML): Engages in designing, manufacturing, marketing, and servicing semiconductor processing equipment used in the fabrication of integrated circuits. Market cap of $18.0B. MRQ revenue has increased 24.02% ($1,458.5M vs. $1,176M y/y) while MRQ inventory has increased 0.41% ($1,455.8M vs. $1,449.8M y/y). Inventory/current assets has decreased from 33.34% to 25.99%, comparing 3 months ending 2011-09-25 to 3 months ending 2010-09-26. Might be undervalued at current levels, with a PEG ratio at 0.89, and P/FCF ratio at 7.86. The stock has gained 12.84% over the last year.

4. NetLogic Microsystems Inc. (NETL): Engages in the design, development, and sale of processors and integrated circuits. Market cap of $3.46B. MRQ revenue has increased 6.76% ($106.81M vs. $100.05M y/y) while MRQ inventory has decreased 11.56% ($38.33M vs. $43.34M y/y). Inventory/current assets has decreased from 13.47% to 11.29%, comparing 3 months ending 2011-09-30 to 3 months ending 2010-09-30. The stock has gained 37.26% over the last year.

5. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD): Operates as a semiconductor company in the United States, Japan, China, and Europe. Market cap of $4.06B. MRQ revenue has increased 4.45% ($1,690M vs. $1,618M y/y) while MRQ inventory has decreased 13.18% ($540M vs. $622M y/y). Inventory/current assets has decreased from 19.36% to 15.83%, comparing 13 weeks ending 2011-10-01 to 13 weeks ending 2010-09-25. This is a risky stock that is significantly more volatile than the overall market (beta = 2.18). The stock is a short squeeze candidate, with a short float at 12.4% (equivalent to 5.42 days of average volume). The stock has had a couple of great days, gaining 6.59% over the last week.

6. Broadcom Corp. (BRCM): Designs and develops semiconductors for wired and wireless communications. Market cap of $17.60B. MRQ revenue has increased 8.36% ($1,957M vs. $1,806M y/y) while MRQ inventory has decreased 8.20% ($491M vs. $534.86M y/y). Inventory/current assets has decreased from 13.95% to 10.93%, comparing 3 months ending 2011-09-30 to 3 months ending 2010-09-30. The stock has had a couple of great days, gaining 10.9% over the last week.

7. RDA Microelectronics, Inc. (RDA): Designs, develops, and markets radio-frequency and mixed-signal semiconductors for cellular, broadcast, and connectivity applications. Market cap of $453.77M. MRQ revenue has increased 45.99% ($83.93M vs. $57.49M y/y) while MRQ inventory has increased 31.13% ($37.28M vs. $28.43M y/y). Inventory/current assets has decreased from 34.52% to 15.97%, comparing 3 months ending 2011-09-30 to 3 months ending 2010-09-30. The stock has lost 25.64% over the last year.

8. MEMC Electronic Materials Inc. (WFR): Engages in the development, manufacture, and sale of silicon wafers for the semiconductor industry worldwide. Market cap of $1.13B. MRQ revenue has increased 2.60% ($516.2M vs. $503.1M y/y) while MRQ inventory has decreased 11.96% ($375.4M vs. $426.4M y/y). Inventory/current assets has decreased from 27.49% to 17.13%, comparing 3 months ending 2011-09-30 to 3 months ending 2010-09-30. The stock has had a couple of great days, gaining 19.76% over the last week.

9. Yingli Green Energy Holding Co. Ltd. (YGE): Engages in the design, development, manufacture, marketing, sale, and installation of photovoltaic products in the People's Republic of China and internationally. Market cap of $787.79M. MRQ revenue has increased 29.67% ($4,258.58M vs. $3,284.24M y/y) while MRQ inventory has increased 17.68% ($2,641.49M vs. $2,244.66M y/y). Inventory/current assets has decreased from 22.11% to 19.08%, comparing 3 months ending 2011-09-30 to 3 months ending 2010-09-30. The stock is a short squeeze candidate, with a short float at 15.77% (equivalent to 5.15 days of average volume).The stock has had a couple of great days, gaining 26.08% over the last week.

10. IXYS Corp. (IXYS): Engages in the development, manufacture, and marketing of power semiconductors, advanced mixed signal integrated circuits (ICS), application specific integrated circuits, and systems and radio frequency semiconductors. Market cap of $363.87M. MRQ revenue has increased 10.11% ($99M vs. $89.91M y/y) while MRQ inventory has increased 2.51% ($79.6M vs. $77.65M y/y). Inventory/current assets has decreased from 36.71% to 32.99%, comparing 3 months ending 2011-09-30 to 3 months ending 2010-09-30. The stock has had a couple of great days, gaining 5.04% over the last week.

11. Avago Technologies Limited (AVGO): Engages in the design, development, and supply of analog semiconductor devices worldwide. Market cap of $7.74B. MRQ revenue has increased 8.92% ($623M vs. $572M y/y) while MRQ inventory has increased 2.65% ($194M vs. $189M y/y). Inventory/current assets has decreased from 17.39% to 13.93%, comparing 3 months ending 2011-10-30 to 3 months ending 2010-10-31. The stock has had a couple of great days, gaining 11.2% over the last week.

*Accounting data sourced from Google Finance, all other data sourced from Finviz.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

Mercer Completes Hammond Associates Acquisition

Mercer Investment Consulting, a subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., closed its acquisition of St. Louis-based Hammond Associates on Jan. 3, according to a news release on Monday. Terms were not revealed.

Mercer, a global “consulting, outsourcing and investment services,” company with 20,000 employees, said “endowment and foundation funds using investment consulting services grew at a compound rate of 10% annually, compared to a 5% annual rate of growth for both corporate and public funds in the US,” citing Greenwich Associates figures in the release. Hammond employs “more than 120 investment professionals.”

“This acquisition underscores Mercer’s commitment to our investment business and our determination to increase our US market share,” said Mercer’s U.S. investment consulting leader, Jeff Schutes (left). “Mercer is growing at a time when clients are demanding greater resources and depth of expertise from their investment consultants.”

Schutes added in the announcement that pairing with Hammond Associates will “enable us to provide strategic consulting and to demonstrate our depth of expertise in alternative investments such as private equity, hedge funds, and infrastructure.  We feel this will be a significant competitive advantage in a changing market environment.”

Bernanke on Subprime Regulation

Just recently, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke blamed part of the recent financial crisis on a lack of consumer protection carried out by the Federal Reserve. Bernanke (my bold):

What policy implications should we draw? I noted earlier that the most important source of lower initial monthly payments, which allowed more people to enter the housing market and bid for properties, was not the general level of short-term interest rates, but the increasing use of more exotic types of mortgages and the associated decline of underwriting standards. That conclusion suggests that the best response to the housing bubble would have been regulatory, not monetary. Stronger regulation and supervision aimed at problems with underwriting practices and lenders’ risk management would have been a more effective and surgical approach to constraining the housing bubble than a general increase in interest rates…

The Federal Reserve and other agencies did make efforts to address poor mortgage underwriting practices. In 2005, we worked with other banking regulators to develop guidance for banks on nontraditional mortgages, notably interest-only and option-ARM products. In March 2007, we issued interagency guidance on subprime lending, which was finalized in June. After a series of hearings that began in June 2006, we used authority granted us under the Truth in Lending Act to issue rules that apply to all high-cost mortgage lenders, not just banks. However, these efforts came too late or were insufficient to stop the decline in underwriting standards and effectively constrain the housing bubble.

David Leonhardt points out, with some excellent quotes from 2004 to 2007, how the Federal Reserve missed the housing bubble completely. But I want to look at the bolds above. Bernanke applauds the Federal Reserve's practices from 2005 to 2007 to address the problems with subprime mortgages, as if it came out of nowhere, instead of something they actively ignored for almost a decade beforehand.

We know that on Jan. 12, 1998, the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors unanimously decided “to not conduct consumer compliance examinations of, nor to investigate consumer complaints regarding, nonbank subsidiaries of bank holding companies.” This policy was proposed and recommended by Glenn Loney of Board staff, Michael Collins of the Philadelphia Fed, Joan Cronin of the St. Louis Fed and John Yorke of the Kansas City Fed, who put the memo out from the “Fed’s Division of Division of Consumer and Community Affairs.” This isn’t the bosses upstairs overriding the consumer affairs people; the actual consumer protection people at the Federal Reserve said their job regulating subprime loans at shadow subsidiary banking that existed outside traditional regulation wasn’t necessary.

In the past, the rortybomb blog also took a peek at the transcript for “Morning Session of Public Hearing on Home Equity Lending, July 27, 2000″, where Martin Eakes (later of The Center For Responsible Lending) and community bankers begged the Fed to intervene and bring recommendations to the subprime market, something that was well within their power to do. Here is a snippet of Federal Reserve Governor Gramlich’s, who headed the meeting, opening remarks:

GOVERNOR GRAMLICH:…The last few years have seen enormous growth in subprime lending. …This is mainly, surely, a good thing in the sense that this growth in the subprime lending market has brought credit to low and moderate income households…But there are also seemingly some abuses.

There have been a series of anecdotes, a series of TV programs mentioning some of these abuses, there has been a rise in the foreclosure rate, and these adverse statistics have attracted our attention….

We want to keep a relatively analytical focus and focus on specific things that the Fed might do, trying to make sure that, in technical talk, the benefits of what we do outweigh the costs….

If predatory lending is as significant a problem as some people are alleging….

Consumer education is undoubtedly an important facet here because a lot of what we’re going to be talking about are people who are taking loans that they probably wouldn’t have taken if they had fully understood the implications of all of the transactions. And so the Fed has already started on an effort to improve financial literacy, consumer education, and will keep doing that, as will other agencies.

Note: “seemingly some” ; “as some…are alleging” ; “a series of anecdotes, a series of TV programs” ; etc. Even though Eakes and the community bankers give statistics and hard evidence that there are abusive practices going on in the subprime market, the transcript reads of the Federal Reserve holding what is simply a check-the-box meeting, complete with the nod to financial literacy being the best solution. At the meeting, they could have brought up the prospect of doing any number of the later reforms they introduced, but instead they gave a signal to the market that everything will continue as normal.

All the more reason that consumer protection needs to be removed from the Federal Reserve and other locations consolidated inside a separate agency.

Bank of America stock closes below $5

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Bank of America's shares closed below $5 per share Monday, their lowest level since the worst of the financial crisis in March 2009.

Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) fell more than 5% to as low as $4.92 in late afternoon trading. Investors fear that the move below $5 -- while largely psychological -- could also cause some investors to shed their holdings. Shares closed at $4.99.

"It doesn't mean that everyone will drop the stock tomorrow," said Paul Miller, a banking analyst at the investment bank FBR Capital Markets. "Stocks trading below $5 historically have a hard time recovering. You run the danger of a dead stock."

Below the $5 threshold, many broker-dealers will not allow investors to buy or short a stock on margin. Buying on margin means that an investor can simply put down 50% of the price of a stock initially, and the trading firm advances the rest.

The best and worst of Wall Street 2011

Additionally, certain mutual funds will not hold stocks below $5. Still, such forced selling would probably not be imminent.

With its sub-$5 stock price and its stock down more than 62% this year, Bank of America could follow Citigroup's lead and consider a reverse stock split. This move doesn't change the value of the company. Instead a reverse split lowers the number of shares, but puts them all at a higher value.

In March 2011, with its stock at $4.50, Citigroup announced it would do a reverse stock split. In doing so, it reduced its 29 billion outstanding shares to 2.9 billion, and multiplied its share price by 10. In other words, the market value of the bank did not change.

Still, even with a $24 share price now, Citigroup's investors have lost 45% since the March announcement.

"Historically, reverse splits suck for investors," said Dan Greenhaus, chief global strategist at BTIG. "But it would get them away from that $5 level."

A spokesperson for Bank of America said the company had no comment about its stock price or a potential reverse split.

It's been a tough year for Bank of America. In late August, the bank finally appeared to catch a break when legendary value investor Warren Buffett purchased $5 billion of its preferred shares. Despite giving the stock the "Buffett bounce," shares of dropped more than 28% since Buffett announced his investment.

Among other challenges, Bank of America has mounting problems related to its mortgage business.

The bank's rapidly declining share price is likely to increase pressure on the bank to slim down and sell assets. Bank of America has already said it plans to lay off 30,000 workers over the next several years.

However, Bank of America's shares are still relatively far from the stock's all-time intraday low of $2.53 hit on Feb. 20, 2009.

Bank stocks across the board took a beating Monday on continuing fears over how the sovereign debt crisis in Europe could affect the long-term health of the financial sector.

Shares of Morgan Stanley (MS, Fortune 500) dropped the furthest, closing down 5.5%. Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) dropped 4.7%. JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) moved down 3.7% , and Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500) fell 2.7%.

Traders and analysts said much of the selling was due to negative headlines coming out of Europe as well as reports that tougher regulations on banks could come to pass sooner than expected.

As part of the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory reform, a rule could be proposed this week requiring banks with more than $50 billion in assets to take on less leverage and less risk, said a source close to the situation.

Miller said that investors are also worried about a Wall Street Journal article that described a proposed US accounting rule that would force banks to hold more assets to protect against future losses. The current model solely forces banks to hold more assets after they've generated these losses.

Meanwhile, European Central Bank President Mario Draghi, speaking before the European Parliamentary Commission Monday, also failed to promise any plans to buy more debt of troubled European nations in order to help the economy as a whole and banks.

"Financial and market participants want him to come and say 'We'll buy bonds,' and there's no indication that he's any closer to doing that," said BTIG's Greenhaus. "The financial sector is the most exposed to that."

CNNMoney's Jennifer Liberto contributed to this story.  

Futures Up; Sprint Rising, Dollar Tree Falling

Stock futures are up ahead of the open of the year’s last full trading week.

Falling in premarket are shares of Dollar Tree Inc. (DLTR), down more than 3.5%.

Shares of Spectra Energy (SE),�Dow Chemical�(DOW) and Sprint Nextel�(S) are all rising, up about 2%.

Sprint was climbing after news that its improved $2.97-a-share bid for Clearwire Corp. (CLWR) had been approved by Clearwire’s board. Shares of Clearwire are falling 9% right now, to $3.08.

Weatherford International‘s (WFT) stock is up nearly 4% after the submitted amended filings for previous periods as it tries to clear up�previously-admitted accounting errors.

Shares of American International Group (AIG) are up 1.5% after it said it will sell its stake in AIA Group in a move that should raise about $6.5 billion.

In macro news, the Fed’s New York general economic index fell for its fifth straight month�in December, and declined by more than economists’ expected.

Some good reads to set you up for the week:

Forecast is sunnier, but Washington casts a big shadow: “The American economy could finally have a pretty good year next year � assuming Washington does its part.” (NYT)

Change beckons for central banking: “Across the world, a time of radicalism and change beckons for the now not-so-staid world of central banking.” (MarketWatch)

Moody’s gets no respect as bonds shun 56% of country ratings: “The global�bond market�disagreed with Moody�s Investors Service and Standard & Poor�s more often than not this year when the companies told investors that governments were becoming safer or more risky.” (Bloomberg)

 

Financial-Crisis Lessons From a Great Investor

Think about these closing prices for the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI  ) :

  • Oct. 9, 2007: 14,164
  • March 5, 2009: 6,594
  • Oct. 5, 2012: 13,610

What we've been through in the last five years may only happen once or twice in a lifetime. It took some of the world's smartest investors by surprise.

Last week, I asked famed value investor Mohnish Pabrai what he learned from the financial crisis and how he responded to the market crash. Here's what he had to say (transcript follows):

Morgan Housel: As you look back at the last four years, now that we've gone through the financial crisis and we've had a recovery, what have you learned the most?

Mohnish Pabrai: Well, I think I probably didn't fully comprehend everything that we were going to go through, so I probably didn't appreciate the huge abyss we were going to fall through and how long the recovery is going to take. So that was certainly an education.

And I would say that I think what I learned is that you have to appreciate the role of probabilities and outliers in outcomes. I think that there are events that will take place from time to time in our lifetimes which will defy what we might think is likely to unfold. So the way the real world unfolds is vastly more messy than the way we might think it unfolds. I think that's just part of the territory.

Morgan Housel: How did you respond in 2008? You had blue chip stocks falling 60%, 70%. How did you respond as an investor?

Mohnish Pabrai: So one of the problems I had at the time is I was caught very flat-footed and very fully invested, so I could clearly see there were lots of opportunities, even 5Xs and 10Xs that we could invest in, but I didn't have dry powder, and I have since worked on that since then to always make sure that I'm never caught in that sort of a situation, so one of the lessons that came out is to make sure you have some ammo to go at things.

I was lucky that one of the stocks I owned actually went up during the financial crisis, and went up quite a bit. This was Fairfax Financial. And so what I did is I sold Fairfax and used that cash to make a number of investments. In fact, the fourth quarter of 2008, especially in the last, I would say, four or five weeks of the year, I probably did more investments than in my career.

So ... I was seeing lots of opportunities in the commodities space, and they all looked very cheap, and I didn't have the time to really thoroughly drill down on each one, and so I took a basket approach. So we bought into a half a dozen commodity businesses, literally with two or three days of analysis, looking at just a few factors that mattered. And I think every single one of them was a winner. We didn't have any losers in that space. In fact, one of them, (unclear), went up 8X.

So the good news was that I was not behaving like a deer looking at headlights. I was very cognizant of the fact that they were tremendous opportunities, and I tried as much as we could to leverage those opportunities. In fact, in 2009, the funds were up like 125% ... and part of that was because we'd made those bets. That was a wonderful time from an investment point of view.

More from the Motley Fool
The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out what it is in our brand-new free report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2013." Just click here to access this limited-time report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Time to Simply Watch Transocean

It's been terribly difficult year-and-a-half for the world's largest offshore drilling contractor, Transocean (NYSE: RIG  ) , and, unfortunately, it's impossible to predict with any sort of accuracy when its mounting tribulations will be reversed.

On Tuesday, following the commencement of a public offering of 26 million new shares, the company's per-share price slid 9.4% to $41.43. As such, for the year, the company's common shares have tumbled by 40% thus far in 2011. In addition to the primary offering, the company's underwriters will have the option to purchase as much as an additional overallotment of 3.9 million shares. The shares will be sold at a public offering price of $40.50 each. Net proceeds to the Zug-based company, following underwriting discounts, likely offering expenses, and a Swiss Federal Issuance Stamp Tax will be about US$1,008 million.

Transocean expects to apply the proceeds from the offering to a partial refinancing of its recent financing of Aker Drilling ASA, which it originally paid for with its available cash and the assumption of Aker's outstanding debt. For instance, the proceeds will replace the approximately $1.7 billion to repurchase Transocean's 1.50% Series B Convertible Senior Notes, which would come due at the close of 2037.

Transocean operates a fleet of 135 modern mobile offshore drilling units. It also has two ultra-deepwater drillships and four high-specification jackups under construction. Aker, which had been pursued by Bermuda-based Seadrill (Nasdaq: SDRL  ) , is the owner and operator of two of the world's largest and most modern semisubmersible drilling rigs and has a pair of ultra-deepwater drillships under construction in Daewoo, South Korea.�

As you know well, Transocean was the owner of the Deepwater Horizon rig, which was completing a deepwater Gulf of Mexico well for BP (NYSE: BP  ) on April 20, 2010, when the rig exploded, burned, and sank, killing 11 of the hands aboard and resulting in the largest oil spill in U.S. history. With the after-effects of the tragedy appearing to have abated somewhat, BP, Transocean, and cementing contractor Halliburton (NYSE: HAL  ) have just been notified by the obviously relentless Obama administration that they face additional citations, probably within the next two weeks, for alleged safety and environmental violations dating back to the tragedy.

Nevertheless, Transocean continues to experience difficulties. Last week, one of its offshore drilling units, which was working offshore Newfoundland for Husky Energy, was struck by a supply ship. Apparently the rig suffered some damage, although there were no reports of injuries or pollution.

Given its still unsettled circumstances, especially as they relate to potential additional charges by the U.S. government and its unsteadiness in the market, I'm inclined to simply watch Transocean until a more definitive upward direction is established for the stock. Easily the optimal way to keep up with the rapidly changing company is to add its name to your version of The Motley Fool's free and personal My Watchlist.

This Stock Is Beating 98% Of The S&P 500

In November, I told you about a company I suggested as The Market's Next Big Turnaround Story. And if ever a company had room to turn around, then it was this Silicon Valley stalwart.

Its stock peaked at $108 a share on the last day of 1999. Then came the "Dot-com" bust. Within two years the shares had fallen to a low of $8. Most of the ensuing decade has been spent playing catch-up to a new wave of competitors.

The brand was -- and still is -- iconic. But in recent years, shares have floundered. And since 2008 the company has chewed up and spit out four CEOs.

 

Then, this past July, the company "got what it wanted," in the words of Amy Calistri, chief investment strategist for Stock of the Month.

Amid much fanfare, Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO) named as its CEO former Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) star Marissa Mayer, who at 37 became the youngest CEO of a Fortune 500 company.

Mayer was brought in to make Yahoo! relevant again. As The New York Times noted this week, the new CEO "has emphasized ways to modernize Yahoo!... to help them contend with ever-newer competitors."

As a result, investors are getting what they wanted.

With a total return of 32%, Yahoo's shares have beaten 98% of the S&P 500 since Labor Day.

I tell you all this because Amy added 300 shares of the stock to her Stock of the Month real-money portfolio at $16 per share. That was in early August, just three weeks after Mayer came on board. (Amy subsequently added another 150 shares, lowering her cost basis to $15.75 per share.)

In her August issue, Amy declared that the right change in leadership "can absolutely transform a troubled company." So far, Amy has been right. Yahoo's shares finished Friday at $19.64. Amy and her readers are up 23% on her original purchase.

But can it happen again? It already has.

In fact, the CEO card played a major role in Amy's most recent portfolio addition, but with a twist...

In this case, the "new" CEO has been in place nearly five years, after an eight-year hiatus. What Amy found was a company whose CEO proved himself not once, but twice.

This founder and CEO left the top job in 2000, only to see store traffic slide in the years after to record low levels. By the end of 2007, the company's share price had fallen more than 50% from 20 months earlier.

What happened next?

In January 2008 the founder took back the helm. "It was a tough year for almost every company as the global economy plunged into recession," noted Amy. "But it was even more challenging for [this company]. Non-performing locations were closed. Expansion was redirected overseas. Quality and customer experience were reprioritized."

But here's the best part: The share price rose almost eight-fold in less than four years, from single digits in November 2008 to a peak of $62 earlier this year.

And a recent easing from those highs has made for an attractive buying opportunity, according to Amy.

Here's more...

Bob: For those readers who haven't already guessed, your most recent portfolio addition is Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX). What role did the leadership of CEO Howard Schultz play in your selection?

Amy: Identifying a battle-tested leader was paramount in the search for my December "Stock of the Month."

They say a rising tide lifts all boats. In a rising market and rebounding economy, CEOs -- the boats' captains -- are less of a factor. But when the market is fragile and global economic headwinds are blowing, I want a leader who has successfully navigated a company through difficult times. On that front, Howard Schultz has a track record that is difficult to rival.

In 2007, the share price of Starbucks dropped more than 40%. The company had become complacent with a model that prized expansion above all else. Margins were falling and earnings growth was slowing.

When Schultz returned to the company in 2008, the global economy was in a dire state. Most companies were struggling due to the recession... and Starbucks wasn't fairing any better.  

To get things back on the right track, Schultz started closing non-performing locations, rerouting expansion overseas, and reprioritized quality and customer experience. After four years with Schultz back at in control, shares of Starbucks rose roughly 200%.

Bob: What other factors make Starbucks "Stock of the Month" worthy?

Amy: When I search for an idea, I look for the single best investment opportunity at that time. One of my key tenets is finding a trend that has been underestimated by the market.

Clearly Starbucks is known and appreciated by the market. This can be seen by its relatively rich valuation. Its forward price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) is 20.3.

Yet I firmly believe that the market will still be surprised by this company's ability to generate growth in a challenging environment. Its management team, its diverse business model and lower input costs make it a triple threat in the throes of a profit battle. And should economic conditions improve, this stock won't miss any of the upside.

For example, revenues for Starbucks' packaged goods -- the segment that distributes Starbucks brands to grocery stores -- grew 33% in the fiscal fourth quarter. Although this group only accounts for roughly 12% of the company's revenues, Starbucks has plans to double the segment's international presence by 2015 and believes the group could overtake its retail store business in size and profitability.

The company is also about to acquire Teavana (NYSE: TEA), a 300-location specialty tea retailer. Teavana is primarily a mall-based outlet. But after the acquisition, Starbucks will start to open Teavana locations in high-profile neighborhoods, much like the current Starbucks store model. Over time, Starbucks locations will offer some Teavana products.

And in October, Starbucks started selling its Verismo single-serve coffee and espresso brewer. While you could always pick up small ticket gifts at Starbucks, this is its first foray into a big ticket item (in the range of $200 to $400, depending on the model).

Starbucks also has some added margin protection. The price of coffee beans has been in freefall, dropping roughly 40% since April 2011. That should act as a nice buffer over the next few quarters.

Bob: How can individual investors research management on their own? What are the key things they should be looking for?

Amy: When looking for a high-functioning management team, there are things to look for and things to avoid.

If I see a struggling company start to make overpriced acquisitions -- as Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ) did when it bought Autonomy last summer -- then that's a red flag. To me it signals a panicky management team hoping to buy a quick fix to a failing business model.

Complacency is also a red flag. Until Lou Gerstner came along, IBM (NYSE: IBM) was banking on its legacy hardware business -- long after computer hardware started to be a commodity. Likewise, prior to Mayer's arrival at Yahoo!, the company continued to focus on Web traffic -- once a meaningful metric -- long after its revenues started to languish.

Somewhere between complacency and panic is the management sweet spot, and that's what investors need to look for. Look for a company with a measured and calculated sense of urgency -- a company with an unambiguous and executable vision -- and you'll find savvy leadership.

Bob: Yahoo! has had a great run this fall. Is it too late for new investors?

Amy: Since Mayer's arrival, the stock has been on what I call a "relief" rally. It's really been a joy to watch the company lay out a strategy that makes sense in the context of our current media and advertising environment. But while I think the relief spurt is over, I still think Yahoo! has the capacity to outperform the market as its financial performance starts to validate its revamped strategy. So I still think the stock has room to reward new investors.

An Alternative form of lodging short-term apartment rentals

In metropolitan and cosmopolitan areas, the concept of short term apartment rentals is increasing. This is particularly true in large cities like Rome where a sizable portion of its populace are always on the lookout for a house to buy. Though this does not mean that getting a house is impossible, you may need to have a place to stay while you are still in the process of evaluating available houses for sale

Once a person finds this method useful and suitable for their necessities, he or she will follow the same method for the next time. Also, he or she would be recommending that method to their friends and relatives. In the same way, the concept of short term renting has become popular and an ongoing trend in the metropolitans.

Short term apartment rentals are also called as temporary housing and such kind of rental options will be best suitable for people who come for business trip or for a short term vacation. Though temporary rentals are present since many years, they are gaining much popularity in recent times. These short term apartment rentals Rome are the best solutions for those who come from towns to the cities for short term purposes i.e. for business dealings or for sight seeing purposes.

Hence, these temporary rentals are mostly availed by these people. Such guests will have a shorter period but they want to have best facilities for the reason that time. They can also visit other options like hotels, as well as other lodging options. But they will not have the feeling of lodging inside a homely atmosphere. When they choose short term apartment rentals, they can have the feeling of residing in their own house or in the house of their relative or friend.

Few decades back, the communication system had not been so developed and hence if anyone wanted to opt for rental apartments, he or she should have known the owner directly or should have a common friend or relative. Nowadays, the communication system has changed much.

Also the mode of transportation has taken new forms. More and more number of people also have access to wide number of transport options. Hence, people of present generation can easily find their suitable apartment for rental. This is one of the major reasons for the increase of number of people opting for rental apartments. Here’s another reason for the increase of these kind of apartments. Because of the increase in transportation options, more and more number of individuals have now easy access to tour nearby cities. People residing in these cities have found a new way to earn money and to capitalize on their guest houses.

Those that want to earn money from their houses can give their apartment for rent for the visitors who are looking for short-term lodging options. This kind of earning option is not going to demand much money in the form of investment. Hence, more number of rental apartments have emerged.

The ideal option in this case is to find a flat that can be leased on a month-by-month basis. Because the lease is only monthly, the individual signing it can choose to pick up and leave at anytime without penalty. Often, these apartments come fully furnished. This really is convenient for people who do not want to furnish a flat only to live there a couple of months.

Another time when people want a place to live for only some months is for an extended vacation. This might be someone wanting to try life in the different, interesting location. When staying just for leisure, obviously you do not need a permanent home.

For this purpose, there are holiday rentals for last minute apartments Rome. People can rent a location only to stay for a summer vacation, or a couple months for leisure activities. This is great for families or anyone not wanting to stay in a hotel for an extended period.

Generally, the prices of would be less than the costs of medium range hotels. For your prices they charge, the services made available from the apartments are very much attractive. Also, they offer good range of freedom and flexibility. All these reasons put up for your increase in number of people opting for short term apartment rentals.

Want to find out more about rome apartments for rent, then visit Richard Shigley’s site on how to choose the best holiday apartments rome for your needs.

Netflix To $100, But Should You Buy The Stock?

Breaking news. Shocking development. Coming up. Don't go away!

Netflix (NFLX) appears poised to touch and eventually hold $100.

It's hitting strong resistance between $97.60 and just shy of its $97.80 intraday high but, who knows, by the time you read this it could have busted out.

See if (NFLX) is in our portfolio

Doesn't really matter because if it doesn't happen today, it will happen tomorrow or the next day or the day after that. It's inevitable. What's driving this rise? Could be misinterpretation of the recent deal with Disney (DIS). Maybe it's legislative success that, according to All Things D, went down the same way last year but never made its way out of Congress. Netflix is working to overturn an outdated law that prohibits the sharing of personal video rental histories online. Or did Whitney Tilson go on television again, pumping his NFLX position with tantalizing notions of Netflix as a "value" play? Just as the timing of when NFLX hits, holds and crosses $100 doesn't matter, neither does the reason. It will happen pretty much the way it did last year when NFLX topped out at a high of $304.79 only to crash to as low as $52 and change. $100. $200. Even $300. Nothing would surprise me. As I explain in the above-linked Disney article, very few people actually understand the relationship between old and new media. For whatever reason, many otherwise intelligent people cannot wrap their heads around the argument that Disney made a horrible mistake, unless it merely took advantage of a Netflix it doesn't expect to be around come 2016. This misunderstanding makes the word of guys like Tilson and Netflix CEO Reed Hastings the word of God. They spin nice stories; the market and hack analysts who missed as badly on NFLX in 2011 as they did on Apple (AAPL) this week respond and drive the stock higher on no news and a curious ignorance to uncertainty. Heck, I'm not even as bearish on Netflix heading into 2013 as I was a throughout all of 2011. In fact, I classify myself moderately bullish, albeit cautious. The company has quite a bit going for it. I explain most of my cautious bullishness in this article and several linked within it. In fact, back at the end of July, I advocated buying NFLX before it rises from the dead. The stock is up about 67% since then.

1 2 Next › Last »

But we need some moderation alongside this bullish NFLX spin from the usual suspects.

We need Apple's Tim Cook to come out and talk about the nuts and bolts of negotiating with big-time content companies. Hastings tries to present these relationships as "partnerships." Bull!

We need the great CEO of Time Warner (TWX), Jeff Bewkes, to come out in his typical straightforward fashion and explain why Disney did a really dumb thing. Of course, I assume Bewkes agrees with me (or that I agree with him), but based on what I know about the guy I would be shocked if he viewed the situation all that differently than I do.

However, even some tempering from these guys will not stop Netflix's rise. This thing moves on air. If you bought back in July, take some profits, for goodness sake. Up 67%, you should have banked something already. That said, there's never anything wrong with carefully playing an emotional or irrational stock market. Just be careful and treat profits with respect -- don't leave them hanging too long. Follow @rocco_thestreet

>To order reprints of this article, click here: Reprints FREE for a limited time only: Get TheStreet Ratings #1 Stock Report NOW! « First ‹ Previous 1 2

Top Stocks For 12/20/2012-20

Reported by: Emon crwenewswire Mideast correspondent.

Amnesty International said that Georgia must do more than the bare minimum to provide housing, jobs, and health care for more than 200,000 people displaced by war over the past two decades.

The Report said that many people were displaced during wars in Abkhazia and south Ossetia in the early 1990s and they continue to live in very dire condition, with some 42 percent still in kindergartens, hotels, hospitals and barracks.

In a report two years after the Georgia’s war with Russia over rebel South Ossetia, the UK based rights watchdog said that they suffered unemployment and exclusion from society.

Displaced people need more than just a roof over their head, they need the government to ensure employment, access to health care and benefits, they need also to be consulted and to be able to make choices affecting their life.

The Government of Georgia was praised for how quickly the displaced people were placed in new settlements and for the plan to improve living conditions for those displaced over the past 20 years.

Pro Russian South Ossetia and Abkhazia threw off Georgian rule with the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 90s. In 2008, more than 100,000 people on both sides were displaced when Russia crushed a Georgian assault on separatist South Ossetia, some 26,000 Georgian are unable to return.

THIS IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY SECURITY!

High Dividend Yield Stocks With Strong Cash Coverage

Dividends are not future guarantees. Although companies try very hard to avoid cutting their dividends because of the bad publicity, a history of paying a dividend does not mean the company will necessarily continue to do so.

As an investor going into a dividend stock investment, it's vital to perform due diligence first if you want to rely on the dividend income.

Operating cash is often the company's source for funding dividend payments -- at the very least, it's the most sustainable source.

This implies that dividends are only as sustainable as the company's operating cash flows, so analysis of cash flows is important.

To illustrate this concept, we ran a screen on stocks paying dividend yields above 3% with sustainable payout ratios below 50%. We screened these stocks for those with at least three times the TTM operating cash flow per share compared to the dividend per share over the same time period.

These companies maintained a sizeable cushion between their dividend payments and the operating cash they generated. Do you think they'll continue this sustainable trend?

Use this list as a starting point for your own analysis. List sorted by dividend yield. (Click here to access free, interactive tools to analyze these ideas.)

1. Navios Maritime Holdings (NYSE: NM  ) : Operates as a seaborne shipping and logistics company in Greece. Market cap of $374.22M. Dividend yield at 6.52%, payout ratio at 30.88%. Total operating cash flow per share at $1.79 vs. TTM dividends per share at $0.24.

2. Universal (NYSE: UVV  ) : Operates as a leaf tobacco merchant and processor worldwide. Market cap of $1.0B. Dividend yield at 4.45%, payout ratio at 33.93%. Total operating cash flow per share at $6.26 vs. TTM dividends per share at $1.90.

3. BT Group (NYSE: BT  ) : Provides communications solutions and services worldwide. Market cap of $24.13B. Dividend yield at 3.81%, payout ratio at 34.75%. Total operating cash flow per share at $8.62 vs. TTM dividends per share at $1.22.

4. Sasol (NYSE: SSL  ) : Operates as an integrated energy and chemicals company. Market cap of $30.94B. Dividend yield at 3.53%, payout ratio at 33.41%. Total operating cash flow per share at $5.35 vs. TTM dividends per share at $1.65.

Interactive Chart: Press Play to compare changes in analyst ratings over the last two years for the stocks mentioned above. Analyst ratings sourced from Zacks Investment Research.

Your browser does not support iframes.


Kapitall's Alexander Crawford does not own any of the shares mentioned above.Data sourced from Screener.co.

Is Applied Materials the Right Stock to Retire With?

Now more than ever, a comfortable retirement depends on secure, stable investments. Unfortunately, the right stocks for retirement won't just fall into your lap. In this series, I look at 10 measures to show what makes a great retirement-oriented stock.

Electronic devices like smartphones and tablets have become ubiquitous accessories for tech-savvy consumers. But behind every device is a host of companies helping to make its components, and behind many of those component makers is Applied Materials (Nasdaq: AMAT  ) , which builds the manufacturing equipment that helps produce those building blocks. Below, we'll look at how the company does on our 10-point scale.

The right stocks for retirees
With decades to go before you need to tap your investments, you can take greater risks, weighing the chance of big losses against the potential for mind-blowing returns. But as retirement approaches, you no longer have the luxury of waiting out a downturn.

Sure, you still want good returns, but you also need to manage your risk and protect yourself against bear markets, which can maul your finances at the worst possible time. The right stocks combine both of these elements in a single investment.

When scrutinizing a stock, retirees should look for:

  • Size. Most retirees would rather not take a flyer on unproven businesses. Bigger companies may lack their smaller counterparts' growth potential, but they do offer greater security.
  • Consistency. While many investors look for fast-growing companies, conservative investors want to see steady, consistent gains in revenue, free cash flow, and other key metrics. Slow growth won't make headlines, but it will help prevent the kind of ugly surprises that suddenly torpedo a stock's share price.
  • Stock stability. Conservative retirement investors prefer investments that move less dramatically than typical stocks, and they particularly want to avoid big losses. These investments will give up some gains during bull markets, but they won't fall as far or as fast during bear markets. Beta measures volatility, but we also want a track record of solid performance as well.
  • Valuation. No one can afford to pay too much for a stock, even if its prospects are good. Using normalized earnings multiples helps smooth out one-time effects, giving you a longer-term context.
  • Dividends. Most of all, retirees look for stocks that can provide income through dividends. Retirees want healthy payouts now and consistent dividend growth over time -- as long as it doesn't jeopardize the company's financial health.

With those factors in mind, let's take a closer look at Applied Materials.

Factor

What We Want to See

Actual

Pass or Fail?

Size Market cap > $10 billion $16.6 billion Pass
Consistency Revenue growth > 0% in at least four of five past years 3 years Fail
Free cash flow growth > 0% in at least four of past five years 4 years Pass
Stock stability Beta < 0.9 1.10 Fail
Worst loss in past five years no greater than 20% (42.1%) Fail
Valuation Normalized P/E < 18 9.78 Pass
Dividends Current yield > 2% 2.5% Pass
5-year dividend growth > 10% 13.4% Pass
Streak of dividend increases >= 10 years 2 years Fail
Payout ratio < 75% 19.8% Pass
Total score 6 out of 10

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Total score = number of passes.

With a score of six, Applied Materials satisfies some of the needs of conservative investors without delivering on all of them. The company stands out from most of its peers by paying a healthy dividend, but the stock has given shareholders a less-than-smooth ride in recent years.

Applied Materials makes manufacturing equipment for semiconductors, flat panel displays, and the solar industry. It counts chip giants Intel (Nasdaq: INTC  ) and Texas Instruments (NYSE: TXN  ) among its customers, and with the chip space having rebounded dramatically from its swoon during the financial crisis, Applied Materials has gone along for the ride. It has Micron Technology (Nasdaq: MU  ) and several solar companies as clients as well.

Despite facing serious competition from rivals Novellus Systems (Nasdaq: NVLS  ) , KLA-Tencor, and Lam Research (Nasdaq: LRCX  ) , Applied Materials is big enough to make strategic decisions that give it a competitive advantage. Its big purchase of Varian Semiconductor Equipment was a gutsy call on the next up-cycle for the chip market.

In addition, Applied Materials is pushing hard into flat panel displays, going up against specialist Universal Display (Nasdaq: PANL  ) in the lucrative OLED market. Orders in that segment have risen dramatically from 2010 levels.

For retirees and other conservative investors, tech stocks often seem like a minefield. But with a reasonable valuation, good dividends, and reasonable prospects for growth going forward, Applied Materials might well be the right tech stock for your retirement portfolio.

Keep searching
Finding exactly the right stock to retire with is a tough task, but it's not impossible. Searching for the best candidates will help improve your investing skills, and teach you how to separate the right stocks from the risky ones.

Add Applied Materials to My Watchlist, which will aggregate our Foolish analysis on it and all your other stocks.

If you want to retire rich, you need to be confident that you've got the basics of your investment strategy down pat. See if you're on track by following the "13 Steps to Investing Foolishly."

Vanguard Introduces Web Comparison Service for Annuities

Vanguard announced Wednesday, September 8, that it had launched a new Web comparison service for individuals that allowed them to compare income annuities from a number of insurance companies. The service, called Vanguard Annuity Access, is powered by Hueler Companies' Income Solutions platform and is useful for those individuals trying to compare annuities that offer guaranteed streams of income or for retirement plan participants rolling over assets into a Vanguard IRA.

According to Vanguard, "Prospective purchasers can obtain customized quotes on a real-time basis and evaluate competitively priced, directly comparable contracts frommultiple companies." Direct contribution plan participants ready to retire will be able to use Vanguard Annuity Access as an IRA rollover option. This is in lieu of offering the option within the plan; plan sponsors are concerned that such an "in-plan" offering may increase fiduciary responsibility and add complexity to the plan.

Fixed deferred annuities are also available through Vanguard Annuity Access; fixed interest durations will vary from three to seven years. Such investments "are designed for tax-sensitive investors" who want to supplement existing retirement savings, which may include IRAs or 401(k)s.

Kinder Morgan Earnings Preview

Midstream companies have grabbed investor attention recently, and for good reason. Oil and gas production volumes have increased across America, resulting in a massive build-out of midstream infrastructure and a ton of acquisitions.

Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI  ) and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (NYSE: KMP  ) are the first big name American midstream companies to report earnings, coming after the market close tomorrow. Kinder Morgan has been pretty busy over the past few months and there should be plenty of material to pour over in the third-quarter releases for both the general partner and the master limited partnership.

Third-quarter moves
Things are still shaking out across the Kinder Morgan companies as KMI moves to complete dropdowns from the El Paso acquisition. In mid-August, KMI dropped down 100% of its Tennessee Gas Pipeline acquisition, and a 50% stake in the El Paso Natural Gas Pipeline, to KMP for $6.22 billion.

These dropdowns are important because they allow KMP to make up cash flows lost to divestments related to the El Paso acquisition. KMI was forced to sell assets in certain regions to avoid antitrust violations. Though these dropdowns will affect the balance sheet positively, we likely won't notice any significant difference until next year.

In more immediate news, investors will see the effect of a crude and condensate pipeline that came online in June. The KMCC pipeline started service from the Eagle Ford Shale to the Houston Ship Channel. It has a capacity of 300,000 barrels per day and is supported by long-term contracts.

Other Q3 moves of note include Kinder Morgan Energy Partners' long-term condensate processing and storage deal with BP. KMP will spend $75 million to expand an existing facility in Houston, which should be in service by 2014.

Expectations
Analysts are expecting earnings in the range of $0.14 and $0.35 per share for KMI, and $0.59 per unit for KMP. Last quarter, KMI reported a loss of $0.15 per share, and KMP reported earnings of $0.37 per unit. Both results missed estimates; however, all of the Kinder Morgan companies, including Kinder Morgan Management (NYSE: KMR  ) and El Paso Pipeline Partners (NYSE: EPB  ) increased their dividends last quarter, and it stands to reason all entities will be able to maintain their payouts.

Foolish bottom line
Kinder Morgan reports after the market close at 4:30 EST on Wednesday, and interested investors can listen in here, or click here to add Kinder Morgan to My Watchlist.