2011 No Dreamboat for MannKind

As binary events go, they don't get much bigger than decisions on Food and Drug Administration marketing applications. They can change the fortunes of a company in the blink of an eye, or at least however long it takes to read the letter from the FDA.

Imagine how different MannKind's (Nasdaq: MNKD  ) 2011 would have been if it had gotten its inhaled insulin Afrezza approved in January. This article would be about whether the company was hitting its sales figures.

Instead MannKind ends the year down 66%, even more if you measure from the peak of the run-up into the FDA decision. About the only good news is that the stock is up about 20% from the doldrums of August. Maybe investors are gaining confidence that the drug will gain FDA approval on its third attempt.

You'll recall that the complete response letter in January was actually MannKind's second. The first requested more information on the clinical utility of Afrezza; we'll blame that one on the FDA. The second seems to be MannKind's fault. The company switched to a better inhaler and tried to convince the FDA that laboratory tests should be sufficient to approve the new device.

It wasn't. The agency wanted data from actual humans taking the drug.

After a blessing from the FDA on two new clinical trials to prove that the new device works as well or better than the old one, MannKind got the trials started. If the company can enroll the trials quickly, they could be completed by the end of next year.

I don't think the risk here is that the trials won't be a success. Data from trials using Afrezza to date has looked pretty good. The bigger issue is whether MannKind can get the trials enrolled quickly. The current cash and a credit facility should last through the first quarter of 2012. That's not much leeway.

A quick enrollment would also give investors confidence in the commercial prospects for Afrezza; if patients are interested in trying it out in a clinical trial, more are likely to be interested once it's on the market. Pfizer's (NYSE: PFE  ) inhaled insulin Exubera was a commercial flop, and while Afrezza is arguably a much better product, there's still a worry that diabetics will shun an inhaled insulin product, being content enough to stick themselves with needles of insulin made by Novo Nordisk (NYSE: NVO  ) , Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY  ) , Sanofi (NYSE: SNY  ) , and others.

If you're looking for something a little less dependent on binary events for next year, check out the Fool's new free report, in which Fool analysts report their top pick for 2012. Just click here to grab your free copy.

E-Trade Up 6% On Revised Takeover Hopes

Shares of E-Trade (ETFC) are up over 6% this morning to $1.81 on new hopes of consolidation in the discount brokerage arena.

The market is responding to a report in Reuters that quoted TD Ameritrade (AMTD) CEO Fred Tomczyk saying, “”There are lots of potential acquisitions and we’ve got a lot of firepower, so we do look at that.”

E-Trade saw a similar spike last November, when Tomczyk addressed the possibility of a deal involving the rivals.

TD Ameritrade shares are up 1.5%, or 31 cents, today to $20.49.

First Solar Projects Are Hot Commodities

First Solar Inc. (FSLR) announced that billionaire investor Warren Buffett's MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire its Topaz Solar Farm.

The transaction is a win-win situation for both the parties since with the Topaz deal First Solar is able to clear its house with all the big four U.S. based utility solar projects under sale. The other three big ticket projects include the 660-megawatt Desert Sunlight project in California vended to NextEra Energy Resources (NEE) and General Electric (GE); the 348-megawatt Agua Caliente project in Arizona sold to NRG Energy Inc. (NRG); and the 280-megawatt Antelope Valley project in Nebraska sold to Exelon Generation (EXC).

On the other hand the buyer of the Topaz project would be able to qualify for the U.S. Treasury grant rebate program. For solar installations, the grant is equal to 30% of the system’s cost and the owner will get this amount regardless of their earnings and tax bill. The move to acquire the Topaz project by MidAmerican Energy Holdings is a smart move as the 30% grant would be locked in before its expiry by the end of fiscal 2011.

The 550-megawatt Topaz project, under construction in San Luis Obispo County, California, will have the capacity to generate enough renewable energy to power about 160,000 average Californian homes. The companies did not disclose the financial details of the deal.

The project, in June 2011, was the fore runner in receiving a $1.9 billion loan from the U.S. Department of Energy to cover part of the financing. Though it announced in September that it was unable to qualify for the loan, it was still keen upon pursuing the project.

The Topaz project worth more than $2 billion is one of the largest PhotoVoltaic endeavors in the world. Construction began in November 2011 and is expected to be complete by early 2015. The project will create about 400 construction jobs and 15 ongoing operations and maintenance jobs. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PCG) will purchase the electricity from Topaz under a 25-year power purchase agreement.

First Solar, the largest stand-alone solar module manufacturer in terms of market capitalization, will benefit greatly from the steady economic recovery as well as favorable legislations supporting PV installations. The company’s project pipeline currently stands at an impressive 3.2 GW.

First Solar manufactures solar modules with an advanced semiconductor technology and is a premier provider of comprehensive PV system solutions. The company is delivering an economically and environmentally viable alternative to fossil fuel.

From raw material sourcing through end-of-life collection and recycling, First Solar is focused on creating value-driven renewable energy solutions that protect and enhance the environment.

Moreover, by virtue of its diversified revenue exposure, technological enhancements and cost minimization, the company has a distinct edge over its competitors. Through cadmium telluride-based solar modules, the company offers a differentiated technology versus its silicon-based peers.

However, First Solar’s short-term growth may be partially hampered by the volatile euro, apprehension over reduction in German subsidies, falling crystalline silicon prices and the modules’ glut in the market. The company presently retains a short-term Zacks #5 Rank (Strong Sell). Over the longer run we however maintain our long-term Neutral recommendation on the stock.

EXELON CORP (EXC): Free Stock Analysis Report

FIRST SOLAR INC (FSLR): Free Stock Analysis Report

GENL ELECTRIC (GE): Free Stock Analysis Report

NEXTERA ENERGY (NEE): Free Stock Analysis Report

NRG ENERGY INC (NRG): Free Stock Analysis Report

PG&E CORP (PCG): Free Stock AnalysisReport

14 Tectonic Shifts for Green in 2011

by Michael Kanellos

First, the good news.

The renewable industry will roll on. Solar grew by an astounding 93 percent to 125 percent in 2010 and the waiting lists for electric cars exceed the output. Washington passed the tax credits.

The bad news? Competition will remain as fierce as ever. Here are some predictions on how the face and shape of industry might change. I’m calling these tectonic shifts because they mark how the roles that different greentech companies occupy will change. Plus, if I called it “Predictions for 2011,” you might just barf.

1. Solar Will Become Like the PC Industry, Part II. Two years ago, we predicted that the solar industry would spread rapidly through better marketing and an increasingly horizontal industry structure that would allow specialists to improve products, reduce prices and make money at the same time.

Overall, it’s happened. Solar makers have begun to tailor different panels for different applications. Concepts for cutting installation costs from Solon, Zep Solar and SunPower (SPWRA) have arrived. DuPont (DD), Dow (DOW), 3M (MMM) and others have also continued to refine coatings and membranes.

Now here’s the second part of the PC analogy. The people on top of the industry will begin to change. Remember how Packard-Bell and Compaq used to be the top PC makers in the world? Or how AST was once a dominant figure in the business market? All have now been chased to the tar pits.

In solar, Yingli Green Energy (YGE) and Trina (TSL) have gone from the fringes of respectability to being producers of bankable modules with recognized brand names. In 2010, Suntech (STP) was suddenly not the only well-known Chinese solar producer.

Canadian Solar (CSIQ), a Chinese-Canadian company, wants to be a top-five module producer in a few years, CEO Shawn Qu told me. There is no reason why it couldn’t be.

2. Silicon Widens Its Lead. Back to the PC analogy for a moment. Crystalline silicon -- modular, cheap, and with a broad manufacturing base -- is the desktop of the day. Solar thermal plants -- large, complex, expensive -- have become the mainframes, and are already seeing their market opportunity being gobbled up by crystalline. And thin film: could it become the thin client of its day? Crystalline silicon has the support of materials suppliers, manufacturers, equipment suppliers, installers and even the banks. Every day, it squeaks out a little bit more of an advantage.

Don’t bet against silicon: it seems to be as true now as it was then.

3. Building Management Goes Cold for VCs. Buildings consume 39 percent of the energy in the U.S. and most of them aren’t particularly efficient, but you can get nearly instant payoff from new software.

It sounds perfect for VCs, which explains the flood of investment in the field. But look at what has happened. Earlier this year Siemens (SI) bought SureGrid, a small angel-funded firm, to manage buildings. Serious Materials got into building management by buying Valence Energy, a small angel-funded firm hailing from Santa Clara University.

Honeywell (HON), EnerNoc (ENOC), Cisco (CSCO) and Schneider Electric (SBGSF.PK) have all bought building management firms.

The shopping spree is almost over.

Expect to see a run on lighting management companies like Redwood Systems or Digital Lumens: all of the acquisitions above involve companies that control HVAC systems. A few HVAC players might hit escape velocity. Scientific Conservation says it will move from controlling 15 million square feet now to 150 million square feet of commercial real estate a year from now. If it can pull that off, the customer list will make it quite attractive as an independent company or takeover target.

This will be a big industry -- make no mistake. It just may not be a great time to be a startup anymore.

4. The Rise of the Intermediates. In 2009, demand response, energy efficiency, carbon accounting and other products and services began to meld into one thing. Silver Spring Networks, mostly an equipment provider through 2009, unfurled services that will let it participate more in demand response.Tendril, a home networking concern, bought GroundedPower to provide customer behavioral services to utilities. EnerNoc married demand response to building control.

For lack of a better term, the intermediates will fill the gap between utilities and consumers and, ideally, will be able to make their fees more palatable by being able to garner revenue from both of them. Even lights, computing, and heat as service plans fit here.

Remember how back in 2006 and 2007 utility execs started talking about how utilities would have to transform themselves, offering new services, etc.? Well, this is it.

5. China Becomes a Customer of the U.S. Innovalight, which makes solar ink, has signed four deals with Chinese solar module makersthat ideally will make the Chinese firms more competitive and bring Innovalight revenue.

Demand response is nonexistent in China: expect to see EnerNoc and others venture over there. Those startups with diesel engines and components for boosting gas mileage in cars like EcoMotors and Achates Power will also find willing customers there. U.S. car companies (and solar ones) remain weirdly reluctant to partner with startups. The Chinese realize it’s a great way to close the knowledge gap.

6. LED Prices Will Drop So Fast, It Will Be Tough to Keep Track of the Moore’s Law References. China is minting a large number of LED manufacturers. Both Samsung and LG are reportedly ordering manufacturing equipment to expand LED production. And startups like Bridgeluxwill try to make progress on producing LEDs built on silicon, rather than sapphire, substrates.

All this will lead to cheaper LED chips, which in turn will lead to cheaper bulbs. Expect to see $10 LED bulbs for the home by the end of the year.

7. Time Will Be the Enemy of Nuclear and Carbon Capture. Constellation (CEG) had been planning to build a 1.9-gigawatt nuclear plant in Maryland that would have gone operational in 2017. Between now and then, more than 8 gigawatts of solar will get planted in the U.S. and those panels will provide crucial peak power.

Carbon capture is one of the best growth industries on paper: by 2030, the world will need 850 CCS plants and 3,400 by 2050, according to the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute.

Completed to date: nine.

The costs and logistics are just too overwhelming.

8. Renewable Portfolio Standards Replace Carbon Regulations. Large swaths of voters don’t like carbon regs. By contrast, voters associate RPS programs with improving their communities and adding construction jobs. Even coal-heavy states like Missouri have implemented an RPS. Personal wish list: "Buy American" standards get passed, too.

9. Smart Grid Protests Vanish. The world has a large, but luckily, finite, supply of cranky people with enough time on their hands to attend public hearings. Utilities have finally begun to understand that they need to sell this concept. Swing voters too will begin to understand how a more efficient grid will lower their bills, let them buy electric cars and force people who use peak power to pay their way.

10. These Industries Will Struggle: green building materials (dependent on carbon taxation); car charging (commoditization will make it tough for startups to withstand conglomerates); non-LED bulbs; high-efficiency concentrators for solar; consumer-based car sharing (when cars come back trashed, car owners will pull out -- otherwise sharing is hot).

11. Almost Nothing Happens Here: water, small wind, biofuels, green chemistry, geothermal, portable fuel cells, green consumer products. Same as last year. Same as 2006.

12. Recycling and Resource Recovery Will Take Off. We predicted big things for this in 2009 and 2010. It didn’t happen. But new regulations and rising resource prices will make trash more attractive. China’s threat to curb rare earth minerals has underscored the need. Some companies to watch: Ostara, Lehigh Technologies, MCR, Bioplastech, iGPS, Waste Management (WM), Interface, Autodesk. (ADSK)

13. Psychology Becomes a Growth Industry. With over $30 million in revenue, everyone loves Opower. Expect to see behavioral technology expand. One example: CityBin, which uses the same sort of peer pressure tactics to get people to recycle.

14. Green IT Will Shine. For all of the reasons stated here. Plus, there will be a more pronounced push of IT into farming (CleanGrow, Solum) and household appliances.

Disclosure: No positions

Top Stocks For 4/12/2012-19

Dr Stock Pick HOT News & Alerts!

_______________________________________

FREE Daily Stock Alerts From DrStockPick.com

_______________________________________

Tuesday November 10, 2009

DrStockPick.com Stock Report!

Most Active NYSE Stocks

SymbolCompanyLastChng.%Chng.Volume
CCitigroup Inc$4.18-0.01-0.24%240,111,987
BACBank Of America Corporation$16.03+0.26+1.65%195,148,480
SPYSPDR S&P 500 ETF$109.59+0.02+0.02%170,339,609
FFord Motor Co$8.24+0.06+0.73%136,414,311
ABKAMBAC Financial Group Inc$0.79-0.39-33.05%109,473,600
FAZDirexion Shs Etf Tr$19.49+0.13+0.65%81,722,733
SSprint Nextel Corp$3.24-0.19-5.54%76,793,729
GEGeneral Electric Co$15.78-0.07-0.44%73,403,500
XLFFinancial Select Sector SPDR ETF$14.77-0.05-0.34%70,134,861
EEMiShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF$40.92-0.19-0.46%62,616,055
IWMiShares Russell 2000 Index Fund$58.85-0.37-0.62%53,831,081
PFEPfizer Inc$17.56+0.13+0.75%48,692,092
MOTMotorola Inc$8.85-0.13-1.45%47,388,890
MBIMBIA Inc$3.52-1.28-26.67%39,440,674
WFCWells Fargo & Co$28.10-0.30-1.06%35,178,623
SDSProShares UltraShort S&P500 ETF$36.93-0.04-0.11%34,938,273
FASDirexion Shs Etf Tr$77.81-0.75-0.95%34,505,045

Most Active AMEX Stocks

SymbolCompanyLastChng.%Chng.Volume
GSSGolden Star Resources Ltd.$3.53-0.22-5.87%8,064,788
NXGNorthgate Minerals Corporation$2.96+0.07+2.42%5,321,136
CVMCEL-SCI Corporation$1.34-0.07-4.96%4,303,252
ANXAdventrx Pharmaceuticals Inc$0.10-0.01-9.09%2,578,677
SVASinovac Biotech Ltd$8.49+0.29+3.54%2,547,451
LIALiberty Acquisition Holdings Corp$9.43unchunch2,277,766
NGNovaGold Resources Inc$5.24-0.12-2.24%2,230,622
PZGParamount Gold and Silver Corp.$1.25+0.01+0.81%1,685,959
GBGGreat Basin Gold Ltd.$1.61+0.03+1.90%1,665,077
TGBTaseko Mines Limited$3.29-0.02-0.60%1,580,086
BQIOilsands Quest Inc$1.20-0.03-2.44%1,529,181
NGDNew Gold Inc.$4.19+0.01+0.24%1,490,577
KOGKodiak Oil & Gas Corp$2.63-0.01-0.38%1,455,820
CXMCardium Therapeutics Inc$0.79+0.09+12.86%1,370,017
HEBHemispherx BioPharma Inc$1.20-0.03-2.44%1,311,561
RTKRentech Inc$1.36-0.03-2.16%1,269,167

Most Active NASDAQ Stocks

SymbolCompanyLastChng.%Chng.Volume
QQQQPowerShares QQQ$43.62+0.11+0.25%71,633,073
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation$29.01+0.02+0.07%65,043,123
INTCIntel Corporation$19.50+0.04+0.21%56,192,161
ETFCETrade Financial Corp$1.52-0.06-3.80%52,297,544
CSCOCisco Systems Inc$23.65-0.34-1.42%42,934,067
MPELMelco Crown Entertainment Ltd$4.63-0.30-6.09%33,888,806
BRCDBrocade Communications Systems Inc$9.22-0.02-0.22%33,373,851
RIMMResearch in Motion Limited$63.67+2.11+3.43%28,775,310
JAVASun Microsystems Inc$8.15-0.09-1.09%26,185,793
YHOOYahoo! Inc$16.04+0.02+0.12%23,971,437
CMCSAComcast Corp New$14.85-0.30-1.98%22,916,414
ORCLOracle Corporation$21.80-0.03-0.14%22,573,939
FITBFifth Third Bancorp$9.42-0.31-3.19%21,458,771
AMATApplied Materials Inc$13.00+0.02+0.15%21,355,305
ERTSElectronic Arts Inc$18.29-1.24-6.35%20,785,470
ATVIActivision Blizzard Inc$11.42-0.12-1.04%20,401,479
SIRISirius XM Radio Inc$0.62-0.01-1.41%20,194,177
JASOJA Solar Holdings Co Ltd$4.15+0.03+0.73%19,934,247
NVDANVIDIA Corp$13.13-0.33-2.45%19,413,593

Most Active OTC BB Stocks

SymbolCompanyLastChng.%Chng.Volume
CMGRCamelot Entmt Group Inc$0.00-0.00-11.11%220,517,248
WLSIWellstar Intl Inc$0.00unchunch217,140,450
AGELAngel Acquisition Corp$0.00unchunch140,923,998
INBGInternational Bldg Techs Grp$0.00unchunch100,615,000
GERSGreenshift Corporation New$0.00unchunch70,866,495
CBAICord Blood Amer Inc$0.01+0.00+1.85%41,013,824
CYBLCyberlux Corp$0.00unchunch37,022,760
MCLNMedclean Technologies Inc$0.01-0.00-30.10%25,435,984
SNVPSavoy Energy Corp$0.37+0.22+143.42%21,020,154
ESYMEcosystem Corporation$0.00+0.00+11.11%18,672,200
MDFIMedefile Intl Inc$0.00-0.00-8.57%18,344,348
FHAIFountain Healthy Aging Inc$0.01-0.00-1.42%16,096,316
UNCOUnico Inc$0.00-0.00-7.69%13,126,145
SMWFSeamless Corp$0.00unchunch12,039,957
NEOMNeoMedia Technologies Inc$0.02+0.00+1.33%11,648,467

Bam! Fed and Other Central Banks Act, Dow Jumps 400 Points

At a summer camp I attended, we would sit around a campfire and watch as the head counselor threw “magic dust” on the fire, sending flames soaring into the air. Everyone would go “Ooh!”

That, in essence is what Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and the leaders of five other central banks did to the market today when they agreed to change rates on dollar swaps and add liquidity to the market. Investors went “Ooh!” and shares of companies in Europe and the U.S. soared.

The Dow was recently 406 points higher, rising to 11,962; the S&P 500 was up by 41 points, or 3.4%.

The German DAX jumped 4.3%, France’s CAC rose 3.6%, and the Stoxx Europe 600 was 3.1% higher.

European banks, and U.S. banks with large Europe exposure are doing particularly well, with the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) rising 9.3% and Morgan Stanley (MS) trading 5% higher.

All the Dow stocks are comfortably in the black, and many companies outside of the financial industry are having a big day. United Technologies (UTX), for instance was recently up 4.6%.

Questions Regarding Security Breach May Sink Global Payments

Whenever hackers breach systems holding credit card information, millions of people hold their breath, worried that they will be among those victimized by the security lapse. That is what is happening at the moment, while the details of Global Payments' (NYSE: GPN  ) recent breach get sorted out and the damage assessed.

The bad news is that there could be as many as 1.5 million credit card numbers in the hands of miscreants, who, having exported the information, may now peruse it at their leisure. The one bright spot is that the company reports that no Social Security numbers or other personal information was obtained.

Although this incident does not appear to be anywhere near as large as the 130 million numbers stolen from Heartland Payment Systems (NYSE: HPY  ) in 2008, the ante has gone up this time. Data breach security laws now on the books in nearly all states put the onus on merchants, banks, and credit unions that issue cards to notify customers immediately when their card numbers are compromised. Steep fines can ensue if these laws aren't followed precisely, causing an economic ripple effect apart from the actual security break.

There are some other questions here, though. On Sunday, Visa (NYSE: V  ) removed Global Payments from its list of secure vendors until the company can prove to Visa that its security levels are compliant with industry standards. This is an unusual step, perhaps stemming from the fact that the breach was first reported by Visa and MasterCard (NYSE: MA  ) as being the type of breach whereby enough information was stolen to allow criminals to duplicate cards. As noted by security writer Brian Krebs, the credit card companies estimated the breach to have occurred sometime between Jan. 21 and Feb. 25. Global Payments says the security break didn't occur until early March.

Can this company be trusted?
Although Heartland recovered quite well from its brush with security breaches back in 2008, this situation looks a little spooky to me. Why, for instance, is there such a difference of opinion between Global Payments and the credit card companies regarding the time and the severity of the breach? The ostracizing of this company by Visa also raises red flags, as it seems to indicate the credit card giant is unsure of the security status of this vendor.

If Visa and MasterCard are correct about the timing, at least 10 million cards could be at risk. This is much larger than the 1.5 million that Global Payments is estimating, another discrepancy that seems odd. In this business, trust is huge, and all the questions swirling around Global Payments in regards to this recent breach are unsettling, to say the least.

To its credit, Heartland instituted a new payment system for merchants that heightened credit card information security within two years of its security break. Time will tell if Global Payments does the same, or even if it is able to ride out the current debacle. From what I can see, the trust issue will work against the company's recovery or, possibly, its very survival.

Have you ever noticed how successful investors tend to gravitate toward financial stocks? Learn how and why they do so, as well as how you can profit from this sector, by getting our free report now. Don't hesitate; it's available right here.

Cheniere Energy Shares Jumped: What You Need to Know

Although we don't believe in timing the market or panicking over market movements, we do like to keep an eye on big changes -- just in case they're material to our investing thesis.

What: Shares of Cheniere Energy (AMEX: LNG  ) are up 10% today after the company's credit was upgraded.

So what: Standard & Poor's upgraded Cheniere Energy's credit from CCC+ to B- after the company was able to raise capital and improve its capital structure. The company's Sabine Pass Liquefaction subsidiary also had its rating increased to BB-.

Now what: Credit rating agencies are judging the risk of a company defaulting on its debt, essentially judging the downside risk for equity investors. So it's a good thing for the stock, but it doesn't mean questions about the company have been answered. In the report, S&P pointed out that the company will likely report negative cash flow for the next four years, and that it will have to execute on its export facility over the next few years, as well as access the capital markets again, possibly diluting shareholders.

Interested in more info on Cheniere Energy? Add it to your watchlist by clicking here.

Apple: iPhone Expectations Trimmed at Canaccord, ThinkEquity

As I mentioned earlier this morning, analysts are assessing the prospect of a slowdown in Apple‘s (AAPL) next iPhone, which they are expecting to appear later this year and are dubbing the “iPhone 5.”

Canaccord Genuity’s Mike Walkley, who has a Buy rating on Apple shares and a $775 price target, pores over some “channel checks” for how smartphone sales did in May, finding that sales in general picked up from April’s level fro multiple vendors.

But he sees a slowing this quarter:

In the U.S. market, our checks indicated soft smartphone sales due to aging flagship models from Apple and Samsung somewhat offset by strong demand for but limited supply of new HTC One series smartphones. With the Samsung Galaxy S III smartphones and HTC One Series just starting to ramp volume into the channel combined with our expectations for the iPhone 5 to launch in October, we anticipate more H2-weighted 2012 smartphone sales than normal seasonal trends.

While Apple’s iPhone 4S remained the best-selling phone in the U.S. in May, and sales internationally were helped by “some channels increasing promotions and carriers increasing rebates,” nevertheless, “we anticipate Apple will gradually lose smartphone share during the summer or until the iPhone 5 launches in October.”

Walkley is projecting 27 million iPhone units this quarter, down from 35 million last quarter. He sees that slipping to 24.3 million units in the September quarter.

But iPhone sales should bounce back in a big way in the fiscal Q1 ending in December, he thinks:

We believe global demand for a new iPhone 5 could exceed our December quarter 50M unit estimate due to Apple�s expanding distribution base and large installed customer base. If the iPhone 5 has a larger screen and an overall differentiated form factor from the iPhone 4 and 4S, then we believe Apple�s loyal customer base will upgrade to the new iPhone despite some carriers imposing additional upgrade fees and potentially changing data plans with the iPhone 5.

Meantime, ThinkEquity’s Mark McKechnie, who has a Buy rating on Apple and a $700 price target, cut his iPhone unit estimate for this quarter, though is number is still higher than Walkley’s.

McKechnie cut from 35 million to 29.5 million, and cut his September-quarter estimate from 34.4 million to 28 million. His December-quarter estimate rises from 40 million to 42 million units.

McKechnie also raised his iPad estimates, however, to 14 million from 12 million this quarter, and to 15 million from 12.6 million next quarter.

All that prompted McKechnie to cut his fiscal 2012 estimate from $164.2 billion to $158.99 billion in revenue, and from $48.45 per share in profit to $47.

McKechnie also cut his estimates for Qualcomm (QCOM), an Apple chip supplier, based on the revised iPhone unit projections.

Apple shares today are down $2.79, or half a percent at $561.50.

Nuts! Diamond Foods boots CEO. Stock plunges.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Diamond Foods replaced its CEO and CFO and will have to restate its finances for the last two fiscal years because of bad accounting over payments to walnut farmers, the snack purveyor said on Wednesday.

Diamond Foods' (DMND) stock plunged 37% at the start of trading Thursday, as questions arose over whether this jeopardizes the company's deal to buy the Pringles potato chip division from Procter & Gamble (PG, Fortune 500).

Diamond Foods replaced its former CEO, Michael Mendes, with insider Rick Wolford to serve as new CEO and acting president.

Wolford started his career with Dole Food (DOLE, Fortune 500) and served as the former CEO, president and chairman of Del Monte Foods until his retirement in March of 2011. He has served as director with Diamond Foods since April.

Diamond Foods said that Mendes was "placed on administrative leave," along with another executive, former chief financial and administrative officer Steven Neil.

The San Francisco-based company also appointed a new chief financial officer, Michael Murphy of the corporate consultancy Alix Partners, LLP.

Diamond Foods said that the audit committee of its board of directors determined that the company's financial statements of fiscal years 2010 and 2011 must be restated.

The committee concluded that two payments to walnut farmers, of $20 million in 2010 and $60 million in 2011, were not recorded in the correct periods.

The company has been plagued by difficulties, such as the death in November 2011 of Joseph Silveira, a member of the board of the directors. News reports have suggested that Silveira committed suicide and that it might have had something to do with the accounting mess, but the company has denied that.

"Joe served Diamond shareholders with dignity and dedication for many years," announced Diamond Foods after his death.

The company added that "any suggestion that his passing was somehow related to the accounting investigation" was "demeaning to his legacy."

McDonald's shamrock shake goes nationwide

Diamond Foods' announcement of its executives' ouster raises more questions than answers, according to a report from Jefferies analysts.

"We assume the Pringles deal will be called off now, leaving [Diamond Foods] liable for a $60 million breakup fee to P&G," wrote Thilo Wrede of Jefferies, in a report co-authored with other analysts.

The analysts said they are still trying to make sense out of what's behind the inaccurate accounting, which the company blamed on a breakdown of internal controls.

"We hope to eventually learn more details in this matter," the analysts said. 

Kass: Sweet Opportunity From Sour Sentiment

This commentary originally appeared on Real Money Pro on Dec. 13 at 8:22 a.m. EST.

I continue to believe that the current market volatility and lack of economic predictability, principally owing to the European debt crisis, have likely created a relatively attractive entry point for intermediate-term investors.

Get alerts before Link and Cramer make every trade

The good news is that renters and others lacking conviction have reduced their commitments to stocks, as the sentiment of the most dominant investor classes (retail and institutional, pension plans and hedge funds) has soured. And with that souring sentiment, their commitment to stocks has been reduced.It is good news that we have recently seen the reappearance of a growing list of market Cassandras, who see the sky falling and an imminent global meltdown of monumental proportions. (Remember perma-bulls and perma-bears are attention-getters, not money-makers.)It is good news that the same Wall Street strategists who expected 1500-plus in the S&P 500 in their annual predictions one year ago are now reserved and cautious in their views.And it is also good news that the U.S. is three years ahead of Europe in addressing our debt problems, that the health of U.S. corporations' balance sheets and income statements has been all but ignored by investors and that we have a functioning central bank and ample resources.As I discussed yesterday, the world's economies are imperfect, as structural headwinds are governors to growth, and a relatively weak trajectory of growth is exposed to all sorts of exogenous shocks.Arguably, the stock market has been discounted in reasonable valuations and little, if any, expectation of more positive news. With stocks trading at only 12.5x projected 2012 S&P profits and a 2.05% yield on our 10-year U.S note, this compares favorably to a 50-year average of over 15x during a time in which the yield on the 10-year U.S. note approached 6.70%.With investors either materially in cash or heavily skewed toward low-yielding fixed income, any market recovery could feed on itself in an environment where individuals are uninvolved and hedge funds have multiyear low (i.e., bear-market low) net long exposure and run the risk of being caught offside.Low expectations and an underinvested investment community are all conditions that have historically formed the foundation for a better market setting, as bull markets typically emerge out of periods of bad news (and bear markets typically emerge out of periods of good news).

My net long exposure is about 50% in my hedge fund, which represents the highest exposure at any time in 2011.

I am certainly not "over my skis" long, but I do view reward vs. risk to be as attractive as at any time this year.

Doug Kass writes daily for Real Money Pro, a premium service from TheStreet. For a free trial to Real Money Pro and exclusive access to Mr. Kass's daily trades and market commentary, please click here.

>To order reprints of this article, click here: Reprints

Verizon: Seidenberg Sees No Reason To Merge with Vodafone

Verizon Communications (VZ) CEO Ivan Seidenberg today indicated that there is no reason for the company to pursue a merger with Vodafone (VOD), which owns a 45% stake in Verizon Wireless. (Verizon owns the rest.)

“Absent new information, a merger doesn’t seem to have a lot of appeal,” Seidenberg told reporters today at a Council on Foreign Relations event, according to Reuters.

Seidenberg also said Verizon Wireless is open to selling the iPhone, but that timing would be up to Apple; in particular, he said the company would like to carry an LTE version of the phone.

“It’s their call,” he said. “Eventually it’s our view we’ll get to carrying Apple.”

Put Sellers Looking for Leap Wireless to Jump

By Chris McKhann

Shares of Leap Wireless (LEAP) are pushing back toward multi-year lows, but option traders are looking for a bottom.

LEAP trades down 2.6 percent to $12.16. The wireless communications carrier was up near $12 in the middle of last week and is now pressing toward the multi-year low of $11.96 set on July 6. The shares have been in an extended downtrend for the whole year, with the 52-week high of $27.52 coming in last July, and prices above $18 as recently as early May.

Despite this bearish picture, it is the August 10 puts that dominate the trade this morning, with almost 9,000 changing hands. This volume far exceeds the previous open interest of 249 contracts, so these are new opening positions. The largest block of options -- 7,600 -- was sold for $0.15.

It appears that this put selling was tied to a trade in LEAP stock. There are a number of traders who would sell cheap out-of-the-money puts like this in a strategy known as "picking up nickels," but their numbers are far fewer since the crisis of 2008.

In that regard we do see a block of 50,000 shares of LEAP stock sold a minute after the options traded. If this activity is related it would create a hedged strategy that has an enormous profit range, at least at expiration.

Disclosure: No positions


How to Play Verizon and AT&T

In today's edition, Motley Fool analyst Austin Smith and "Options Whiz" Nick Crow discuss how to make 2012 the year YOU master the market. In this edition, Austin and Nick talk telecom.�Austin likes the dividends that the big duopoly of AT&T and Verizon pay and wants to capture their yield without risking too much money. To counter this, Nick offers an options strategy to allow investors to realize their dividend yields without worrying about their short-term fluctuations.

Please enable Javascript to view this video.

For more details on how to trade Verizon�using similar options strategies with as much potential or more, just click here. You'll be directed to the Motley Fool Options Whiz -- our interactive "Options U" designed to teach you to trade options sensibly, with a minimum of risk, and all the resources of The Motley Fool behind you -- all 100% FREE!

Larger Bank of England Stimulus Was Overridden

Two of the nine members of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee were outvoted at the committees last meeting when they sought to boost its stimulus to 75 billion pounds ($118 billion). The majority was concerned that such a move would cause alarm over the state of the economy and make it appear weaker than it was.

Bloomberg reported Wednesday that, in minutes released from the BoE meeting of Feb. 8-9, Adam Posen and David Miles proposed that, instead of a stimulus increase of 50 billion pounds to bring the overall amount to 325 billion pounds, a package of 75 billion pounds be authorized instead.

However, according to the minutes, the other members said that such a move “risked sending a signal that the committee thought the economic situation was weaker than it was.” The seven argued that “Recent data on the domestic and international economies had on balance been more positive than might have been anticipated towards the end of 2011, pointing to the possibility that growth might be stronger than expected in the near term.”

Posen and Miles had argued for the larger amount of 75 billion pounds of quantitative easing because of “the considerable margin of spare capacity remaining in the economy and the extent of deleveraging still likely to be required,” according to the minutes. They also said there was risk of a “prolonged period of depressed demand causing inflation to fall materially below” the 2% target rate set by the central bank.

QE was expanded in February after figures showed that the economy shrank in Q4 as consumers tightened their belts and the eurozone debt crisis escalated. On Wednesday the MPC said that, despite expected near-term “volatile” growth, the pace of expansion should “strengthen gradually” beginning later in the year. All nine members agreed that the benchmark interest rate should be maintained at its current record low of 0.5%.

According to the minutes, some members also feel that the probability of inflation exceeding the central bank’s target was “slightly higher than shown in the projection” in the Inflation Report issued by BoE last week. Those members argued that a “case could be made for maintaining the stance of policy at this meeting.”

Victoria Cadman, an economist at Investec Securities in London, was quoted saying, “This leaves the door open for more QE. We’re looking for another 50 billion pounds in May, and after that we don’t see any more as the economy picks up in the second half.”

Can Facebook’s Zuckerberg Buck Recent Trend of $1 CEOs?

Facebook�s initial public offering filing revealed that chief executive Mark Zuckerberg plans to cut his salary to $1 a year, joining other high-profile CEOs who have made what some say ultimately amounts to a public-relations gesture.

However, some academic research suggests investors in companies where the chief takes home a dollar or less in salary every year don�t profit after these moves. Also, these rock-bottom salaries can be a smokescreen obscuring the fact that these CEOs are already fabulously wealthy thanks to stock ownership and other goodies.

�CEOs with these arrangements, despite the drastic cuts in salary, have total compensation that is similar to that at other firms, making up lost salary through not-so-visible forms of equity-based compensation,� according to a 2011 paper from the Fisher College of Business at Ohio State University.

�Shareholders of firms with $1 CEO salaries do not fare well in the aftermath of these adoptions,� the professors wrote. �Thus, rather than being the sacrificial acts they are projected to be, our findings suggest that adoptions of $1 CEO salaries are opportunistic behavior of the wealthier, more overconfident, influential CEOs.�

Chrysler�s Lee Iacocca was the first CEO to slash his salary to $1 annually in the late 1970s, and many other top executives — often at troubled companies — have followed in his wake. Critics argue these arrangements are simply designed to deflect attention away from massive stock and options packages CEOs receive.

Here�s a look at some other CEOs of note making a buck:

  • Meg Whitman, Hewlett-Packard (NYSE:HPQ): Whitman agreed to a $1 salary when she joined the information technology giant in September 2011 following the disastrous reign of Leo Apotheker. Hewlett-Packard shares are down nearly 40% over the past year, though up 20% since Whitman came aboard. However, the company still is struggling with poor execution as well as changes in strategy and management, such as reversing the decision to spin off the personal-computer business.
  • Larry Ellison, Oracle (NASDAQ:ORCL): Oracle�s co-founder has been CEO of the firm for more than three decades. Although Ellison�s annual salary is $1, he owns more than 20% of the company and his total compensation was $77.6 million during fiscal 2011, according to Morningstar. �In addition, given the size of his stake in Oracle, we don’t believe that receiving a growing number of stock option grants will necessarily increase his commitment to the long-term success of the firm,� the investment researcher added.
  • John Mackey, Whole Foods (NASDAQ:WFM): Mackey�s $1 salary has been in place since 2006, which makes sense to some investors since grocery chains seem to be in a race to the bottom with thinning profit margins and higher commodity costs. Whole Foods has a policy that caps salaries at 19 times the average total compensation of all full-time employees. Mackey in late 2006 said he would forgo any future stock options awards. �I have reached a place in my life where I no longer want to work for money, but simply for the joy of the work itself and to better answer the call to service that I feel so clearly in my own heart,� he said at the time.
  • Larry Page, Google (NASDAQ:GOOG): Google�s co-founder took the reins from Eric Schmidt last year and has received a salary of $1 a year since 2007 after making the request three years before that. But don�t cry for Page — his net worth was estimated to be nearly $17 billion in 2011.
  • Richard Kinder, Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI): Kinder has a $1 annual salary, but his net worth of more than $6 billion makes him one of the wealthiest U.S. citizens. The Kinder Morgan companies include Kinder Morgan, Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE:KMP) and Kinder Morgan Management, LLC (NYSE:KMR). Aside from the $1 salary, he receives no bonuses or stock options, but owns 30% of KMI.

Load Up On Activision Blizzard Shares Before Diablo 3 Release Date

Recently, a picture of a Best Buy (BBY) in Minnesota showed a release date of February 1 for the Diablo 3 video game. The picture went viral and led to wide speculation of when the game would be released.

There have also been rumors online of the game being released on consoles for the first time. While this would anger some hardcore PC fans, it would also increase revenue for parent company Blizzard. The company will not confirm the game being available for consoles but the company has hired several people to test the compatibility of the game on consoles.

Could the reason for the delay in release be because Blizzard is making sure the game is ready for consoles in time? In 1998, Diablo was released for Playstation after the initial PC release with the help of Electronic Arts (ERTS), but the game did not sell well and did little to win over PC fans of the game.

Back in 2000, when Diablo 2 was released, it sold over one million copies in less than two weeks. At the time this feat was good enough to be the fastest selling computer game of all time. The record has since been eclipsed by three other Blizzard titles, all from the World of Warcraft family.

It is hard to predict the sales of Diablo 3 without knowing if it will be hitting the Playstation 3 and XBOX 360 consoles or not. The first Diablo game sold 1.73 million copies, while the sequel sold 2.82 million copies (sales figures for United States only). In a recent article, I predicted Diablo 3 will sell 4.25 million copies in the United States. If the game is released on the two consoles, I would have to bump my sales estimates up to 6.5 million (1.25 XBOX 360, 1.0 PS3).

On Amazon.com (AMZN), the video game is #154 on the best-selling video game stocks. The game is likely to climb up with any news of a release date. Gamers have been anticipating the game for so long that some are afraid to pre-order the game and have their hopes let down. As of January 14, Diablo 3 has 521,000 pre-orders, according to vgchartz.com.

At the beginning of the year, I selected Activision Blizzard (ATVI) as a stock in my annual top 10 list. The prospects of having the game released on two consoles as well as the popular PC version have me bullish on this stock. In that article I set a price target of $20 by the end of the year for Activision Blizzard shares. I think shares will hit that number and I may look to raise the target price based on release date timing, move to consoles, and holiday season earnings.

I think now is the time to buy into Activision as the company has many positives going for it. On February 6, the company reports earnings. Analysts are predicting the company to report $0.56 in earnings per share. Activision has however beat estimates each of the last four quarters, including most recently a 100% and 250% beat over the last two quarters. Look for the company to report closer to $0.65 based on strong holiday sales from Modern Warfare 3 and Skylanders.

Disclosure: I am long ATVI.

What Do AMC, Huffy, Hoover, and Your Portfolio Have In Common?


If you were shopping for a bicycle, and if money were no object, would you buy a Trek ... or a Huffy?

Now, say you're shopping for a new luxury car. Think fast: BMW or Saab?

How about a vacuum cleaner: Dyson or Hoover?

What these three questions have in common is a single judgment call: Do you trust the quality of the "Made in China" label, or don't you? Because Huffy, Saab, Hoover -- all famous Western brands once considered of at least decent, and in some cases superior, quality, are all now owned by Chinese companies or made in China.

Red Storm Rising

This theme is going to become much more important to consumers -- and investors -- in coming years, as China accelerates its spending of foreign exchange reserves to buy up Western companies, hoping to piggyback upon their brands.

Just a few months ago, China's biggest movie theater operator spent $2.6 billion to acquire America's AMC Entertainment. Just last month, China embarked upon its most ambitious buy ever -- a $15.1 billion purchase of Canadian oil producer Nexen (NXY).

At the same time, in a little-noticed investment, China's biggest securities firm by market cap, Citic Securities, announced last month that it was buying leading independent stock analyst CLSA from France's Credit Agricole. Initially, Citic plans to take only a 19.9% interest in CLSA, but by sometime mid-2013, the securities firm says, it will acquire the whole brokerage -- lock, stock, and barrel -- for a total cost of $1.25 billion.

Why is this important? When it comes to the products you buy, it probably isn't terribly important to you. Your average American consumer probably has more to fear from the quality of poisonous Chinese toothpaste, lead-tainted children's toys, and other low-quality consumer goods than from anything that might emanate from a Chinese stock research house.

But for investors -- and you are one if you participate in your company's retirement plan or even buy mutual funds (where analysts handpick the companies that the portfolios purchase) -- there is a worry here, and it bears some examination.

Related Articles
  • Why You Need to Be Your Own Stock Analyst
  • The Future of Tech Stocks in China
  • Will the Real Chinese Amazon Please Stand Up?

We Come in Peace

On the surface, there may seem no cause for alarm. Announcing the acquisition, Citic stated its commitment to CLSA's "existing independent structure" and to the "independence of its operations." It assured investors that all it really aims to do is "bring capital market products and services from China to international clients" while also attracting "global clients who wish to access China."

Hard to argue with that. But here's the problem: Back in May 2011, when the plan to buy CLSA was but a twinkle in Hu Jintao's eye, CLSA strategist Andy Rothman warned investors of what happens when the Chinese government gets hold of a finance company. Not mincing words, he told us to expect "high-frequency interference" in that firm's operations.

Fast-forward 15 months, and now Rothman's employer, CLSA, is getting taken over by a company indirectly owned by the Chinese government.

This raises the question: Should investors keep believing in CLSA's impartiality? Or will we see an uptick in the number of Chinese small caps (fraudulent and otherwise) receiving "buy" ratings from this formerly independent source?

Just last week, CLSA recommended that investors pile into the stock of Changyou.com (CYOU) -- the "Chinese Zynga (ZNGA)" -- a stock that's lost 45% of its market cap over the past year. Sure, CLSA has always put particular effort into covering Chinese stocks. But going forward, its motivation for the coverage, and its motives in urging investors to buy or sell specific stocks, will be suspect.

Trust, but Verify

CLSA's Rothman says he fully expects to retain his "autonomy" under CLSA's new management: "They have committed to providing us the same degree of independence and the same room for creativity that we've enjoyed in the past," he recently told Businessweek.

Let's hope that's true. Because until it's proven true, concerns over the quality of anything coming out of China will linger -- bicycles, toothpaste, and now buy/sell recommendations for stocks.

Motley Fool contributor Rich Smith holds no position in any company mentioned above.

Groupon Having an IPO Meltdown

Even when the equities markets are in the bull mode, it�s not easy to pull off an IPO. A CEO needs to spend lots of time wooing investors as well as making sure the business is running smoothly. It�s a tough balancing act.

That�s why it is important to have experienced leadership. This certainly has been critical for recent IPOs like Zillow (NYSE:Z) and LinkedIn (NYSE:LNKD).

But when it comes to the Groupon deal, things have been much different. The company�s 29-year-old CEO, Andrew Mason, can�t seem to do anything right.

The latest bad stuff came in a Friday filing. First of all, Groupon�s No. 2 senior executive, Margo Georgiadis, has left the company to go back to Google (NASDAQ:GOOG). She held the post for a mere five months. Interestingly enough, Mason blogged about the departure, “It would have been great if I could say that we batted 1,000%, but that’s rarely the case.” (In fact, lately it seems he has only been able to strike out.)

Next, Groupon had to restate its financials. This is something investors never like to see, especially when it involves major changes.

To this end, the Securities and Exchange Commission has ruled that Groupon can only recognize its commissions as revenue, not the gross value of a voucher. The result: For 2011, Groupon posted $688.1 million in revenue, not $1.52 billion.

But wait, there�s more: Groupon�s filing also addresses Mason�s controversial memo, in which he complained about �insane� media criticism and said the company is stronger than ever. Such missives can be violations of the �quiet period,� which forbid hyped statements from companies.

What to do? In this case, the SEC has required Groupon to disclose the memo. And there even is a disclaimer that tells investors to not rely on it! No doubt, the securities laws can be paradoxical.

Perhaps this filing will mark the end of the drama — and maybe Mason will benefit from some hard lessons. Still, this might not be enough for investors to get comfortable with the deal. For the most part, Groupon has become the laughingstock of the IPO world.

Tom Taulli is the author of �All About Short Selling� and �All About Commodities.� You can also find him at Twitter account @ttaulli. He does not own a position in any of the stocks named here.

The Fed Loves the Deflation Chatter

By Dominique de Kevelioc, de Bailleul
Beacon Contributing Writer

In today’s centrally controlled media and sophisticated techniques of mass mind control and suggestion, finding the truth�whatever that is�requires lots of effort and courage.

We heard the mantra during the housing bubble that real estate never declines.� Well, the awful decline in housing prices is not a first.� Ignoring the purchasing power of the dollar hides three previous downturns in the median home price in the United States since 1970, from 1973 to 1976, again from 1979 to 1983, and during the period of 1989 to 1997.

Some self-serving folks and, mostly, the ignorant deluded themselves and poisoned others in the process regarding this outright falsehood.� Americans now find themselves bankrupt, near-bankrupt or impoverished believing such foolishness.� The lemmings ran off the cliff by the millions.

Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present, controls the past.
�George Orwell

The latest mantra must warm the heart of the Fed: The economy is under threat of deflation.

The markets don’t agree, however.� Since the collapse of Lehman Brothers and subsequent lows of March 2009, a basket of 19 commodities which make up the Commodities Research Bureau Index (CRB) increased 47% from the March lows.� The mother of all commodities, oil, hit a low of $35 per barrel in March 2009, and now trades north of $85.� Where’s the deflation?

Just as the ridiculous notion that housing prices never fall, the chatter surrounding the Fed‘s fear of deflation is ridiculous as well.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has repeated his real fear on several occasions, during testimony before various Congressional committees, Federal Open Market Committee meetings, and in various speeches.� Bernanke’s fear centers on �inflation expectations.�

As long as lenders, borrowers, investors, and savers fear deflation, the Fed can print more and more money and the world will buy it, fearing that buying real assets will lose them money.� And if the world expects deflation in the future, buying debt, especially U.S. Treasury debt, appears to make a lot of sense.� With $129 billion in government debt to be auctioned this week and trillions more in the future, no wonder the Fed spews the word deflation wherever it can.

But we must remember that the Fed needs a complicit media to get away with this nonsense.� Financial programming originating from the U.S. has long ago been hijacked.� The days of Jack Anderson, and later, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, are over.� The corporate/fascist model of controlling flows of information is in full swing.� No funny mustaches, uniforms or berets this time.� Getting conned by a bunch of suits sporting nice haircuts has already worked during the financial con game, so the suits with conservative haircuts will probably be the fashion during this coup.

“Either you think – or else others have to think for you and take power from you, pervert and discipline your natural tastes, civilize and sterilize you.”
�F. Scott Fitzgerald

Why anyone would touch U.S. Treasuries yielding less than the real inflation rate boggles the mind.� Consumer price inflation for the March reached nearly 9.5% year-over-year, according to John Williams of� Shadowstats.com.� Therefore, buying a 10-year Treasury note for a 3.8% yield loses money at a rate of 5.7% per year.

Interest rates aren’t near-zero as we hear over and over again; real rates are negative across the yield curve.� Deflation?� This Fed is printing so much money it’s hard to imagine anything but hyperinflation down the road.� The world’s savings aren’t enough to absorb this amount of new debt offered by the U.S. Treasury.� The Fed, itself, must buy Treasuries in a true monetization of debt scheme, Weimar style.

�Spending by the federal government is out of control, causing it to borrow record amounts. The money to fund this growing mountain of debt must come from savings or �printing�, and the sad fact is that there is not enough accumulated savings in the known universe to satisfy the spending aspirations of Washington�s politicians,� writes one of the leading expert of precious metals, James Turk, of Goldmoney.com.� �So beyond what it can collect from taxpayers and extract from the world�s savings pool, the dollars the federal government is spending can only come from one place � the �printing press�, which in the prevailing monetary system means bookkeeping entries of the Federal Reserve.�

As long as the public is fooled into thinking the economy is headed for a deflationary collapse, the Fed can continue printing money at cheap rates and fill the gaping losses within the banking system while reducing real debt levels of the U.S. Treasury at the same time.

The day will come, however, when Bernanke’s fears are realized.� Inflation expectations will be back again, along with polyester bell-bottoms, platform shoes and the Bee Gees.� But this time, a percent per month hike in consumer prices will seem like a picnic in comparison to what’s in store.

People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid.
- Soren Aabye Kierkegaard

Surprising Facts About the Rental Car Industry

Renting a car can be a both a pleasant and an unpleasant experience all wrapped up into one. On the one hand, who doesn't love driving someone else's car for a few days? On the other, is it just me, or do you generally feel that you get fleeced into buying additional products you don't need?

Despite these varied experiences, few people know much about the underlying companies themselves, much less how they operate. Do you know who the biggest rental car company is? How many cars they own? Where they buy their cars? How long they own them? What they do with them once they're done? Or whether any of the companies themselves are good investments?

My guess is no -- unless you've already read this article, that is.

The major players
There are four major players in the rental car industry, operating nine different brands.

Company

Brands

Annual Revenues

Fleet Size

Enterprise Holdings

Alamo, National, and Enterprise

$14 billion

> 1 million

Hertz Global Holdings (NYSE: HTZ  )

Hertz and Advantage

$8.3 billion

615,600

Avis Budget Group (Nasdaq: CAR  )

Avis and Budget

$5.9 billion

393,000

Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group (NYSE: DTG  )

Dollar and Thrifty

$1.6 billion

107,000

Sources: Company websites, annual reports, and Morningstar.com.

Enterprise is the largest rental car company in the world. It's number 15 on Forbes' list of America's Largest Private Corporations, and in terms of revenue, it would rank around No. 190 on the Fortune 500 if it were publicly traded. By comparison, its next largest competitor, Hertz, weighs in at No. 309.

Feeding the beasts
With fleet sizes in the six- to seven-figure range, it should be no surprise that rental car companies are the largest purchasers of cars and trucks in the United States.

Although precise figures for the industry are elusive, it isn't difficult to get a rough idea. According to the annual reports of Hertz, Avis, and Dollar Thrifty, rental car companies typically hold their vehicles for anywhere between 4 and 22 months, with an average holding period of 13 months. To put it another way, each year, they turn over roughly 92% of their respective vehicle inventories.

On average, then, these four companies potentially buy nearly 2 million cars and trucks each year. And as you can see below, a significant proportion are purchased from American car companies like Ford (NYSE: F  ) , General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) , and Chrysler -- making rental car companies some of their most important individual customers.

Company

GM

Ford

Chrysler

Other

Hertz

47%

5%

N/A

48%

Avis/Budget

24%

25%

18%

33%

Dollar/Thrifty

27%

52%

16%

25%

Source: Annual reports and author calculations. All statistics relate to 2011 vehicle purchases for the domestic market.�

Disposing of the used cars
In addition to buying a lot of cars, companies like Hertz sell a lot as well.

As a general rule, rental car companies buy a large portion of their vehicles subject to repurchase or depreciation programs with the vehicle manufacturers. Under these programs, manufacturers agree to repurchase the vehicles at a specific time and/or price in the future, subject to certain conditions, or to guarantee the depreciation rate on the cars throughout the holding period.

In 2011, nearly half of cars sold by Avis and a quarter of Hertz's were so-called "program" cars subject to such agreements. Dollar Thrifty, the smallest of the three, nearly never uses this option, choosing instead to rely principally on the used car market to dispose of its used vehicles. And data for Enterprise, because it's a private company, isn't available.

Rental car companies also have the option of selling used vehicles to wholesalers, who then sell them to used car retail outlets, or directly to used car customers themselves. Last year, for example, Hertz sold approximately 65% of its non-program vehicles at auction, 19% directly to dealers, 9% through their own Rent2Buy program or at retail locations, and approximately 7% through other channels.

So, are rental car companies a good investment?
With one exception, the answer to this question over the last few years has been no.

While each of these companies may pride themselves on brand recognition and the like, for most travelers, rental cars are a commodity, interchangeable in most leisure travelers' eyes depending on price.

On a theoretical level, this interferes with the ability to develop a moat around their products and/or services. And on a practical level, it impedes margins and profitability. Avis and Hertz, for instance, have been profitable in only one and two of the last five years, respectively.

Indeed, all but Dollar Thrifty have been beaten resoundingly by the broader market since 2007, with Avis and Hertz down by nearly 50%.

HTZ Total Return Price data by YCharts

Foolish bottom line
Much like the airline industry, rental car companies probably aren't the best place to stash your extra investment cash. Still, this doesn't mean the auto sector as a whole should be avoided like the plague. GM and Ford were dealt a blow during the recession, but they have both bounced back operationally, and many believe short-term�pressures created an incredible buying opportunity. Find out whether one of our top equity analysts agrees in a premium research report with in-depth analysis on�whether Ford is a buy�right now, and why.

To access this free report while it's still available, click here now.

Markets Now Overvalued on Long Term Basis

With the S&P 500 Index and a number of other benchmark stock market indices flirting with cycle highs, I will be monitoring things very closely over the next few days to see if the market’s overbought condition spells more downside potential than an expected consolidation. Or will the Index surprise us and fly trough the 1,151 area?

In addition to being overbought, the S&P 500 is also now expensively valued on a long-term cyclically adjusted PE (CAPE) basis, according to Robert Shiller, economics professor at Yale and author of, among others, Animal Spirits, Subprime Solution and Irrational Exuberance.

In order not to work with notoriously unreliable forward-looking earnings estimates, I have always preferred using Shiller’s CAPE methodology, or normalised earnings, as they average ten years of earnings. This measure provides a good picture of the market’s value regardless of where we are in the business cycle. I have therefore been updating a CAPE chart for a number of years. On this basis, the multiple has increased to 20.5 since the March low of 13.3, representing an overvaluation of 25.0% when compared to a long-term average of 16.4.

Click to enlarge:

“Where breadth goes, the market usually follows,” goes an old market saying. Breadth indicators are useful tools to assess the inner workings of the market’s rallies or corrections, and are used to identify strength or weakness behind market moves, i.e. to assess how the bulls and the bears are exerting themselves.

One such measure is net new highs, calculated by subtracting the number of new 52-week lows from the number of new 52-week highs (see top pane in the chart below). This indicator often peaks before the price index, as was the case in January. It has also been falling sharply over the past few days. Is this again a precursor to a lower S&P 500 (bottom pane)?

Click to enlarge:

Source: StockCharts.com

I stand by my summary in my Words from the Wise review on Sunday: Although the fat lady has not yet made her appearance to signal the end of the bull cycle, the steepness of the nascent rally, together with resistance in the area of the January highs, could result in stock markets consolidating in order to work off a short-term overbought condition.

On the fundamental front, tighter money does not necessarily spell a declining stock market, but turning off the “juice” will certainly remove a tailwind, making earnings growth the key determinant for generating further gains (especially in light of stretched valuations).

NVDA: Longbow Agrees They Pushed Out AMD At Apple

Longbow Research semiconductor analyst JoAnne Feeney this afternoon reiterates a Neutral rating on shares of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), writing that she has “independent confirmation” of the story by SemiAccurate’s Charlie Demurjian from earlier today that Nvidia (NVDA) has pushed AMD out of the business for graphics processing units (GPU) in future Apple laptop designs.

It appears, writes Feeney, that there has been not a technical slip but a cooling of the relationship between Apple and AMD:

AMD’s GPUs will no longer be appearing in Apple MacBooks — at least not next year. We estimate that this Apple business will have generated $40-43M in sales for AMD in 2011 (about 2.5%-2.9% of sales), but the hit to reputation is likely to be a bit larger. Contacts confirm that AMD GPU performance is not the issue — this is some sort of a customer-supplier tiff and Apple is known to be very difficult with its suppliers.

Feeney thinks a quarter of the 11 million MacBook laptops Apple may ship in 2012 will have a GPU (excluding all the “Air” units, which will use integrated graphics), and with an average selling price of $15, that amounts to a $40 million opportunity.

This is “the other shoe” dropping for AMD, which takes a hit to its reputation, she writes, and, conversely, it’s a “lifeline” for Nvidia. That’s perhaps good news, actually, for AMD, as it clears away the last big potential negative for the stock, she writes:

We do not see this pointing to share loss for AMD GPUs more generally, but it is not likely to improve confidence in the AMD story. That said, this is likely to be the last bit of AMD-specific bad news and with that behind it, AMD will now likely trade in line with broader market conditions.

AMD shares are down 9 cents, or 1.7%, at $5.38, while Nvidia shares are up 56 cents, or 4%, at $14.49, having completely reversed losses in the morning session.

Saks, Macy’s Jump on Earnings

Saks (SKS) and Macy’s (M) posted strong earnings results and investors rewarded then on Tuesday, as both stocks rose more than 4% in morning trading.

Macy’s posted EPS of $1.70, which was higher than its own guidance range of $1.63 to $1.65 and analysts expectations for $1.65. Same store sales rose 5.2% in the quarter, although gross margin slid by 33 basis points as has been the case for many retailers. Online sales grew 40% year over year and accounted for 1.7 percentage points of the same-store-sales increase. The company’s 2012 guidance was in line with expectations.

Saks rode strong luxury spending to a better than expected quarter, posting 17 cents of EPS, three cents ahead of expectations.

�Our comparable store sales rose 7.7% in the fourth quarter, in line with our expectations and on top of an 8.4% comparable store sales increase in last year�s fourth quarter,” said Chairman and CEO Stephen Sadove in a statement. “For the full fiscal year, our comparable store sales rose 9.5%, among the best in retail.�

Top Stocks For 2012-1-10-6

 

FARMINGDALE, N.Y., Sept. 28, 2011 (CRWENEWSWIRE) — Cemtrex Inc. (OTCBB:CTEI.OB) announced that it has entered into an agreement to provide US$25.0 million of Green DCV products and services to an infrastructure company located in India.

The agreement is for the evaluation, design, and installation of Cemtrex’s proprietary energy efficiency system, “Green Direct Control Ventilation (DCV),” for commercial and industrial facilities with Dynacon Pvt. Ltd., an India-based company, which serves businesses all throughout India. The agreement further states that the deployment of the products and services will occur over the next two years.

“This agreement marks a major milestone for us as a company, especially with a highly profitable product like Green DCV which was entirely developed in-house within the last three years,” said Saagar Govil, Vice President of Cemtrex. “Despite the current economic conditions, securing this agreement has demonstrated our team’s commitment and ability in acquiring new business opportunities. We are confident that with this project involving more than a hundred facilities, other large companies, both domestically and internationally, will follow suit and see the value in our energy efficiency products like Green DCV.”

Cemtrex’s Green DCV system, a proprietary technology, is designed to optimize indoor air quality while lowering energy consumption by up to 40% in commercial and industrial buildings. The state-of-the-art ventilation control system achieves energy savings by monitoring carbon dioxide levels and regulating the facility based upon occupancy levels.

Cemtrex Inc. is a worldwide market leader in manufacturing and selling the most advanced instruments for emission monitoring of particulate, opacity, mercury, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, etc. and environmental control products for the industry. Cemtrex also markets Green DCV, an innovative energy efficiency solution for high-quality green buildings that pays for itself in 3-5 years. The company’s products are sold to power plants, refineries, chemical plants, cement plants and other industries, including federal and state governmental agencies.

Safe Harbor Statement

This press release contains forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of risks and uncertainties. Statements made herein are as of the date of this press release and should not be relied upon as of any subsequent date.

Source: Cemtrex Inc.

For further information, please contact:

Saagar Govil
Cemtrex Inc.
sgovil@cemtrex.com
http://www.cemtrex.com

 

 

THIS IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY SECURITY!