Top Stocks For 2012-1-29-2

PLL, Pall Corp.

CSCO, Cisco Systems, Inc.

CPRX, Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners Inc.

DrStockPick Watch List!

 

DrStockPick Watch List! for Thursday September 3, 2009

 

My Picks for Thursday September 3, 2009 are:

PLL, Pall Corp.

PLL is a filtration, separation and purification leader providing Total Fluid ManagementSM solutions to meet the critical needs of customers in biopharmaceutical, hospital and transfusion medicine, energy and alternative energy, electronics, municipal and industrial water, aerospace, transportation and broad industrial markets.

PLL’s Centrisep air cleaners protect helicopter engines from airborne contamination by utilizing centrifugal force to continuously remove particles, such as sand, dust and salt spray, before they can enter the engine air intake.

PLL’s Centrisep� Air Cleaners Chosen for the aerospace industry�s most-produced helicopter Mil Mi-8 and Mi-17, both from Russian Helicopters.

Russian Helicopters is one of the largest helicopter producers in the world.

CSCO, Cisco Systems, Inc.

CSCO designs, manufactures, and sells Internet Protocol (IP)-based networking and other products relating to the communications and information technology industry worldwide.

Telefonos de Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. (First Service Provider) launched Telepresencia Administrada TELMEX, a regional plan in Latin America to market and deliver CSCO TelePresence(TM) for multipoint intracompany services as well as for intercompany connectivity, to enable services between a given company and its customers, suppliers and partners in the region.

CPRX, Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners Inc.

CPRX is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of prescription drugs for the treatment of addiction and obsessive-compulsive disorders.

CPRX has received approval from The NASDAQ Stock Market to transfer the listing of its common stock from The NASDAQ Global Market� to The NASDAQ Capital Market� effective at the opening of the market on September 3, 2009 (tomorrow).

All companies listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market� must meet certain financial requirements and adhere to NASDAQ’s corporate governance standards.

Add PLL, CSCO and CPRX to your Watch List!, do your homework, and like always BE READY for the ACTION!

Smart Grid Storage: Juicing Business for Lithium Battery Makers

There’s no question that electric vehicles (EVs) will become one of the standard choices for mainstream transportation in the next several years.

From Ford (F) to Ferrari, nearly every major car manufacturer has announced an upcoming model. And companies like Chevrolet (GM), Nissan (NSANY.PK)and Mitsubishi (MMTOF.PK) already have them in limited production.

But big volumes of EVs are still on the horizon and won’t be rolling off production lines until sometime next year. That’s a short-term problem for battery manufacturers like Ener1 (HEV) and A123 Systems (AONE).

Fortunately, there’s another market that’s starting to keep them busy in the meantime… the smart grid energy storage market…

Flattening Out the Demand Curve

One of the utilities sector’s biggest problems is the uneven demand for power.

Typically, it starts to rise around 6:00 when people wake up, and rises dramatically throughout the day to level off around noon. It then gradually tapers off as people switch off their TV’s, lights, and other appliances to go to bed, usually around 9:00.

That can make business tricky for utilities, which need enough generating capacity online to meet that demand… no matter the time.

Solving that dilemma has led them to look heavily into load leveling, a method of managing those fluctuations. One common example involves storing excess electricity during slower times to use when operations have to speed up.

Usually, utilities generate baseload power – the required minimum – via large nuclear or coal-fired power plants that run all the time. But they have to produce more than expected maximum demand… usually in the neighborhood of 20% excess capacity.

Most new plants, on the other hand, run off natural gas, due to America’s newfound abundance of the fuel. They’re the ones largely responsible for handling the extra 20%.

That has definite perks, since they can be brought online in a matter of hours, compared with the days large baseload plants require. But that doesn’t mean they’re instantaneous.

That’s where storage batteries come in. A large bank of them can be brought online in a fraction of a second, easily making up for the sudden drops that affect the typical utility everyday.

Battery Makers to the Rescue

A123 Systems and Ener1 are starting to see increasing demand for their grid battery storage technologies because of this need.

Last November, Ener1 announced a $40 million deal with a division of the Russian Federal Grid Company (FGC). The order has Ener1 developing grid storage systems as part of a $15 billion project under way in Russia to modernize its aging power grid.

Bruce Curtis, company president, says,

This is a unique opportunity for an American company to get in on the ground floor of Russia’s historic shift toward energy efficiency as a full-fledged partner. FGC is in a leapfrog mode to incorporate lithium-ion storage technology for multiple uses in an overhaul of what is one of the world’s largest bulk power grids. Russia is one of the largest countries in the world and we believe this contract is only the beginning for us there.

Meanwhile, just last week, A123 officialized a 20-megawatt project from Chile’s AES Energy Storage. This represents an expansion of the relationship between the two.

Back in 2009, they started the commercial operation of a 12 MW spinning reserve project. That was the first energy storage system deployed in Chile.

Chris Sheldon, President of AES Energy Storage, says,

The project will utilize A123 lithium-ion batteries to supply a flexible and scalable emissions-free reserve capacity installation for AES Gener. We are excited to work with A123 to improve the performance and reliability of the Chilean power grid.

So far, A123 has shipped more than 35 MW of its advanced energy storage units to AES and other customers all over the world.

As electric vehicles and grid storage continue to drive demand for lithium, shareholders in miners like Sociedad Quimica y Minera (SQM) will be the big winners.

Disclosure: None

Top Stocks For 2012-1-21-14

DrStockPick.com Stock Report!

Thursday August 27, 2009


Stocks Upgraded Today

CompanyTickerBrokerage FirmRatings ChangePrice Target
Isle of CapriISLESusquehanna FinancialNeutral � Positive
Wilmington TrustWLSun Trust Rbsn HumphreyNeutral � Buy$16
Barclays PLCBCSKeefe BruyetteMkt Perform � Outperform
OlinOLNBarclays CapitalEqual Weight � Overweight
Senior HousingSNHWells FargoMarket Perform � Outperform
Heartland ExpressHTLDUBSSell � Neutral
Knight TransportationKNXUBSSell � Neutral

Stocks Downgraded Today

CompanyTickerBrokerage FirmRatings ChangePrice Target
National Fuel GasNFGArgusBuy � Hold
Sigma DesignsSIGMCollins StewartBuy � Hold
AstronicsATROJesup & LamontHold � Sell$7
Medical Properties TrustMPWWells FargoMarket Perform � Underperform
Jackson HewittJTXOppenheimerOutperform � Perform
AlkermesALKSJefferies & CoBuy � Hold$14 � $11.50

McDonald’s: Right Company, Wrong Time

What a surprise. McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD) beat its earnings estimate for Q4 2011. It was the 14th time in the past 16 quarters that the world�s most recognizable restaurant chain topped expectations; the other two were merely “met estimates.” The announcement also topped off the sixth straight year of improved earnings, and I�m sure if I dug further back I�d find more of the same degree of raw earnings success.

Of course, the market repaid this ridiculously consistent growth by sending the stock more than 2% lower on Tuesday.

How does that old clich� go? Buy the rumor, sell the news? Looks like we have a case of it right here.

Actually, it was 2012�s outlook that got the blame for McDonald’s demise yesterday. Apparently the market isn’t keen on the company�s plan to keep spending, especially against a backdrop of exchange rates that are now going to be working against the company after working for it in 2011.

Might I propose a different reason for Tuesday�s dip, though — a reason investors might subconsciously feel, even if they don�t blatantly recognize it?

McDonald�s Ain�t Cheap

Some of very first investing advice I remember getting was something along the lines of �Don�t buy stocks — buy companies.� It was the cute and efficient way of remembering that stock-picking had everything to do with owning proven, successful companies, and nothing to do with an individual stock�s valuation measures.

It also was the worst investing advice I ever got.

Oh, the underlying idea is spot-on. A bunch of expensive (high P/E ratio) stocks have managed to dole out massive rewards while technically overpriced. Take Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). The stock has not traded under a P/E of 30 since 2008 (and most of that time, the P/E was above 60), yet AMZN shares are 266% higher now than they were then. Amazon is a decided exception, though. In most cases, the valuation will catch up with you eventually.

Enter McDonald�s, stage right. Not that its trailing P/E of 19.3 is unthinkable for many of the market�s stocks, but for MCD, that�s the highest it has been in a normal environment since 2007. (McDonald�s deliberately dipped into the red ink once in 2003 and again for one quarter in 2007, pushing the P/E ratio above 19 at the time.)

Said more bluntly, it�s a frothier valuation than the company could have justified anyway, with or without concerns about this year.

The Rest of the Story

That last assumption might be feather-ruffling for many of you, considering how highly comparable Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) is trading at a trailing P/E of 24.4, and 2012�s expected income isn�t going to help much on that front. Wendy’s (NASDAQ:WEN) is in the hole for the last four quarters, and even if the current year goes as well as planned, it�s still priced at 24 times its anticipated 2012 earnings. McDonald�s shares already are cheaper than that, and I�ll even go one step further and say I feel McDonald�s is a better-managed (not to mention more reliable) company than Yum! or Wendy�s.

So what�s the problem?

Like I said above, sadly, the stock-picking game isn�t about finding great companies anymore. It�s about outguessing what the rest of the market is going to think about stocks six to 12 months from now, and getting out in front of the crowd before other investors make their move.

And that annoying reality is what makes McDonald�s doubly vulnerable now.

The market doesn�t expect much from Yum! or Wendy�s, and understandably so — neither has been a picture of consistency of late. Oodles of investors are counting on McDonald�s to keep cranking out earnings increases, though. And now that it might not meet those expectations, these same folks are likely to look down from the dizzying heights of the 72% gain since late 2009 and decide they don�t like the view.

Said another way, all of a sudden that 19 P/E turns from being an “acceptable premium for a quality company” to an “unacceptable liability.” Funny how that happens as often as it does when a stock gets as overbought as MCD is right now.

Bottom line: McDonald’s is a great company, to be sure, and I suspect fears of weak results in 2012 are overblown — MCD always finds a way. Nevertheless, investors looking to get into this great company can only do so by getting into the stock … and the stock is apt to be much cheaper within a few weeks now that the weight of the recent gains is bearing down.

As of this writing, James Brumley did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned stocks.

3 Earnings Surprises That Caught My Attention Last Week

We're now one month into the new year, and surprisingly the majority of earnings reports continue to be better than what Wall Street had predicted. With so many companies reporting during the several weeks each quarter that comprise earnings season -- some very outstanding, and in some cases subpar -- earnings reports can fall through the cracks.

For the past three weeks, I've taken a look at nine companies that could be worth further research after either beating or missing their profit expectations. Today, we're going to take a look at three more companies that reported earnings last week and may have slid under your radar, and that you should give a second look:

Company

Consensus EPS

Reported EPS

Surprise %

Alliance Resource Partners (Nasdaq: ARLP  ) $1.78 $1.93 8%
Emulex (NYSE: ELX  ) $0.22 $0.26 18%
Coffee Holding (Nasdaq: JVA  ) $0.30 (0.23) (230%)

Source: Yahoo! Finance.

Alliance Resource Partners
What else can I possibly say about this coal company other than� it did it again! On Friday, Alliance Resource reported its 11th consecutive year of record profits and, in an even more predictable fashion, upped its quarterly distribution for a 15th straight quarter to $0.99.

For the quarter, revenue rose 13.4% while net income skipped 5% higher. Higher coal price realizations aided Alliance Resource's profits even though expenses jumped 14.3% because of higher raw material, labor, and maintenance costs.

Best of all, management appears confident that it will be able to carry its momentum into fiscal 2012. It has nearly all of its coal production under contract through mid-2013 and even has 19.8 million tons of coal contracted through 2015 (for reference, the company guided to 34 million to 35 million tons in 2012). Electric demand is one of those "sure things" you can count on almost regardless of economic booms and busts, and coal is going to continue to fuel that demand (pun fully intended). This company should keep chugging along in 2012.

Emulex
You'd think we almost had a touch of the 2000s last week, with Broadvision rallying more than 100% at one point and both Emulex and Q-Logic (Nasdaq: QLGC  ) crushing EPS estimates. But things aren't always what they appear.

Although the flooding in Thailand had a negative impact on both Emulex and Q-Logic in the data storage sector, it was Emulex that posted the 13% rise in sales and the $0.04 EPS beat compared with Q-Logic, which actually exhibited year-over-year sales and earnings declines. Emulex's earnings beat marked the third straight quarter the company's crushed estimates, and what's more impressive is that management expects this trend to continue. Emulex's third-quarter guidance of $0.17-$0.19 profit on $121 million to $125 million in sales easily surpassed the current consensus expectation of $0.14 on $120.5 million in sales. For 2012, I see more momentum for Emulex, and that CAPScall of outperform I made on the stock a few months back seems like a good call so far.

Coffee Holdings
And you thought that derivative losses were confined just to the banking and oil & gas sectors? Coffee Holding reported a surprising $0.30 per share loss to end its fiscal 2011, a lot worse than the $0.23 gain in EPS that the lone analyst covering the coffee stock had expected.

What caused the shortfall? Rising costs did their damage, but Coffee Holding blamed much of the shortfall on hedging losses. Volatile coffee prices and a lack of liquidity in coffee derivative markets made it difficult to maintain margin requirements and constrained its short-term cash position, forcing it to sell out of many of its positions.

Honestly, this sounds like a company that got caught with its hand in the cookie jar. I've warned against owning Coffee Holding in the past for reasons similar to this. Aside from rapidly growing sales, there isn't much substance behind its figures. Instead, I continue to recommend Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX  ) as the coffee play of choice. CEO Howard Schultz has done a masterful job of turning the company around, and its brand image is easily recognizable worldwide.

Foolish roundup
Sometimes an earnings beat or miss isn't as cut-and-dried as it appears on the surface. I've given my two cents on what's next for each of these companies; now it's your turn to sound off. Share your thoughts in the comments section below, and consider adding these stocks to your free and personalized watchlist to keep up on the latest news about each company.

  • Add Alliance Resource Partners to your watchlist.
  • Add Emulex to your watchlist.
  • Add Coffee Holding to your watchlist.

3 Doomed Vanguard Funds

Growth investors, value investors, income investors, index investors and — saddest of all — investors in retirement are all vulnerable here.

The saddest part is Vanguard�s three worst funds are targeted to investors who can least afford to lose money. Here’s a look:

Doomed Vanguard Fund #1: Death By Mindless Diversification

Say you�re looking for the safety of diversification, thinking this is how you�ll lower risk as you go for growth. You’d immediately think Vanguard Diversified Equity (MUTF:VDEQX) must be the fund for you. Right?

Fuggedaboutit.

This fund stinks, at best. At worst, it�s a dream crusher. You�re promised growth and income in an all-in-one, actively managed fund. But all you get is a fund so watered down you�re doomed from day one.

Diversified Equity is made up of eight mutual funds. Most of these funds are just average, and one of them is Vanguard�s worst, U.S. Growth (MUTF:VWUSX).

This fund-of-funds doesn�t hold any PRIMECAP Management-run funds, which happen to be the best funds in the entire Vanguard stable.

But it gets worse.

Diversified Equity�s eight-fund portfolio has almost 20 management teams. And none of them is on the short-list of funds to build your portfolio from.

Diversified Equity has been around for only a few years, but that�s a few years too long if you ask me. If you own it, sell it. And if you don�t own it, stay away. It would be a tragedy to put even a dime into this dog. But perhaps even more tragic is this doomed fund:

Doomed Vanguard Fund #2: Broken Payout Promises

Vanguard knows many investors — especially retirees — just want their capital to be safe as it generates income. So, Vanguard created a fund that aimed to please with a name that would seem to be right on target: Vanguard Managed Payout Growth Focus (MUTF:VPGFX).

The fund sounds great, but the fund fails to �put out� as promised. Here�s what�s going on:

Managed Payout Growth Focus seeks to give investors a modest initial �payout� of 3% a year with the goal of increasing the returns over time to provide a long-term, inflation-beating income stream.

But the only thing the fund is doing is giving people their own investment capital back and calling it income. For instance, in 2008, 100% of this fund�s distributions were a return of capital. Lately it�s been a more moderate 58% — but that�s still money not being earned. It’s simply being returned to you.

Vanguard has outstanding funds throwing off income left and right. But this �payout� fund is not one of them. In fact, stay away from all three of Vanguard�s �payout� funds.

Not only are they dogs, but all three require a hefty $25,000 initial deposit, and plopping down that kind of money would be a terrible mistake that could haunt you for the rest of your life.

Doomed Vanguard Fund #3: The Target You Want to Miss

With an attractive name, Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 (MUTF:VFFVX) aims to be an all-in-one solution for those retiring in 2055, or thereabouts. Just pick the date and you�re done.

Or not.

Let�s get the only good stuff about this fund out of the way early: It�s diversified, with exposure to domestic and international stocks, as well as bonds. I like a diversified portfolio — when it works.

Target Retirement 2055 invests in three index funds: Vanguard Total Stock Market (MUTF:VITSX), Vanguard Total Bond Market II (MUTF:VTBIX) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (NASDAQ:VXUS). Sounds like it puts the whole world into one easy initial investment of just $1,000, right?

Wrong.

Convenience has its downside — a downside of 47.7%, to be exact. That�s how much I estimate it would have lost if it had existed during the last bear market.

This is a super-long-term fund, and Vanguard is putting its investors into index funds when there are better active funds available to them. Don�t forget that when you index all of the market, you get all of the dogs. Virtually any of the active international managers has outperformed Total International, which replaces three regional international funds that were initially part of the target fund�s portfolio.

This brings up another point. The fund�s new allocation actually raises its risk. Instead of 17.8% of assets in foreign stocks, it now has 27%. Based on the new allocation, your loss in the last bear market would have been even worse: A $10,000 investment would have declined to $5,160.

So what�s the value in a target fund? Simple: It makes decisions easier for 401(k) benefits managers … but at the expense of retirement savers.

Hopefully, with this knowledge now in your possession, you’ll better equipped to profit with Vanguard than you were five minutes ago.

1 Reason Southern Co. Looks Attractive

Margins matter. The more Southern Co. (NYSE: SO  ) keeps of each buck it earns in revenue, the more money it has to invest in growth, fund new strategic plans, or (gasp!) distribute to shareholders. Healthy margins often separate pretenders from the best stocks in the market. That's why we check up on margins at least once a quarter in this series. I'm looking for the absolute numbers, so I can compare them to current and potential competitors, and any trend that may tell me how strong Southern's competitive position could be.

Here's the current margin snapshot for Southern over the trailing 12 months: Gross margin is 38.8%, while operating margin is 24.0% and net margin is 12.8%.

Unfortunately, a look at the most recent numbers doesn't tell us much about where Southern has been, or where it's going. A company with rising gross and operating margins often fuels its growth by increasing demand for its products. If it sells more units while keeping costs in check, its profitability increases. Conversely, a company with gross margins that inch downward over time is often losing out to competition, and possibly engaging in a race to the bottom on prices. If it can't make up for this problem by cutting costs -- and most companies can't -- then both the business and its shares face a decidedly bleak outlook.

Of course, over the short term, the kind of economic shocks we recently experienced can drastically affect a company's profitability. That's why I like to look at five fiscal years' worth of margins, along with the results for the trailing 12 months, the last fiscal year, and last fiscal quarter (LFQ). You can't always reach a hard conclusion about your company's health, but you can better understand what to expect, and what to watch.

Here's the margin picture for Southern over the past few years.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Because of seasonality in some businesses, the numbers for the last period on the right -- the TTM figures -- aren't always comparable to the FY results preceding them. To compare quarterly margins to their prior-year levels, consult this chart.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

Here's how the stats break down:

  • Over the past five years, gross margin peaked at 38.8% and averaged 35.8%. Operating margin peaked at 24.0% and averaged 22.0%. Net margin peaked at 12.8% and averaged 11.2%.
  • TTM gross margin is 38.8%, 300 basis points better than the five-year average. TTM operating margin is 24.0%, 200 basis points better than the five-year average. TTM net margin is 12.8%, 160 basis points better than the five-year average.

With TTM operating and net margins at a 5-year high, Southern looks like it's doing great.

If you take the time to read past the headlines and crack a filing now and then, you're probably ahead of 95% of the market's individual investors. To stay ahead, learn more about how I use analysis like this to help me uncover the best returns in the stock market. Got an opinion on the margins at Southern? Let us know in the comments below.

  • Add Southern to My Watchlist.

The "New" Global Energy Sector: "The Profit Opportunity of Our Lifetime"

Oil prices will reach a record $150 a barrel, sending gasoline prices to $3.80 a gallon. Commercial nuclear power is making a comeback - but in "nuclear batteries," instead of in hulking power plants of the past. New global-warming regulations will turn air-pollution credits into financial assets that can trade like stocks or bonds. And China's zooming growth will turn the global energy sector upside down.

If this sounds like a view of the distant future - the global energy sector's own version of "Future Shock" - think again.

All of these "predictions" are becoming a reality, even as you read this. And while these transformative events will likely make the global energy sector more volatile and confusing than ever, they are also creating the largest wealth-creating opportunities that most investors will ever see, says Dr. Kent Moors, a career energy-sector consultant who works with governments and corporations throughout the world.

"It's the profit opportunity of our lifetime. Investors who understand the energy-sector shifts that are taking place will make more money in energy investments over the next several years than in any other sector during any other period in their lifetimes," says Dr. Moors, who is also the editor of the Oil & Energy Investor newsletter. With the changes he's currently projecting, "a large measure of energy independence for the U.S. becomes possible. And I'm not just talking about a mere economic 'recovery' here. We'd be looking at a standard of living that's 60% higher, an economy expanding at 5% to 7% a year and - most important of all - a future that we could dictate."

In an exclusive interview with Money Morning last week, Dr. Moors said that

  • The "Big Oil" companies such as Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) will be supplanted as the "blue chips" of the global energy sector. Investors will be surprised to discover the identity of their successors.
  • Wind, thermal and solar energy technologies may not shape up as the fossil-fuel replacements that many investors expected, although they will play a role.
  • But commercial nuclear power is making a major comeback.
  • Oil prices will hit $150 a barrel a year from now - setting a new all-time high - which will send pump prices to a national average of $3.80 a gallon.
  • And new U.S. carbon-emissions regulations could vault this country into a global-technological-leadership position, affording investors profit opportunities that don't exist right now.
Here is a partial transcript of our conversation.

William Patalon III (Q): You've said that the looming changes in the energy sector offer investors the biggest profit opportunity of their lifetimes. Why are we looking at profit opportunities of that magnitude?

Dr. Kent Moors (A): We are about to experience genuine change in the energy sector. Two things are coming at a rate and scale not experienced before.

First, the supply of crude will begin to have difficulty meeting projected rises in demand. That will create price appreciation, regional differences and a major new round of mergers and acquisitions among oil companies. All of this will provide investment opportunities unlike anything we will see again in our lifetimes.

Second, the energy balance will change - we will have more sources of energy providing portions of that mix - hydrocarbons, alternative, renewable, unconventional - than we have ever seen before. This will create new targets for investment as well as increasing ability to move from one energy sector to another. Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) will be making such moves more accessible and easier for the average investor. Playing ETFs against private portfolio holdings will be an increasingly effective way to tap into the profits coming from such changes.

Here's the bottom line: It's the profit opportunity of our lifetime. Investors who understand the energy-sector shifts that are taking place will make more money in energy investments over the next several years than in any other sector during any other period in their lifetimes. With the changes I'm currently projecting, a large measure of energy independence for the U.S. becomes possible. And I'm not just talking about a mere economic 'recovery' here. We'd be looking at a standard of living that's 60% higher, an economy expanding at 5% to 7% a year and - most important of all - a future that we could dictate.

Q: What are the Top Three trends investors need to be aware of and why?

Moors (A): The top three trends are: First, increasing returns from smaller, focused, companies; Second is an explosion in service-, field- and support-company returns; And third, unconventional production - shale gas and oil, coal-bed methane, tight gas - inside the U.S. market.

The first trend arises because large companies cannot pull adequate profits from smaller projects, while well-run second-tier companies can do so, and do so more efficiently.

The second trend results from the need for additional volume. Operating companies - those that extract the oil and gas - no longer drill their own wells, maintain the fields, shoot the seismic or analyze the test results. All of this is done by the specializing companies in the field-service sector. Business there will be booming.

The third trend reflects a significant change that's taking place in the U.S. market, where unconventional [production] is rapidly moving to replace conventional production.

Q: That's fascinating, and actually leads us into my next question. You've said that this "New Energy Sector" may afford the United States a shot at energy independence. How could this play out and how likely an outcome do you believe that to be?

Moors (A): So long as the U.S. economy remains dependent upon crude oil, energy independence is not possible. However, the rise in unconventional hydrocarbon production - from shale coal seams [and] tight gas formation in sandstone - allows us to increase domestic production of these (and we have a lot of reserves in each category). As we pursue genuine alternative energy, therefore, these new sources of oil and gas may provide an expanding domestic bridge to new energy sources that make us less reliant on foreign sourcing.

Q: The new carbon emissions legislation puts Washington in the driver's seat globally. That's fascinating. Could you explain how that plays out?

Moors (A): We must wait upon what carbon regulations actually emerge from Washington. However, this much is already clear. Carbon capture technology - using the CO2 for feeder stock or to enhance pressure at existing fields, putting a carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) as a central element in an ongoing national energy plan - put American approaches to carbon at the forefront of worldwide attempts to reduce greenhouse gases. Washington's regulations will open up the market opportunities for hundreds of companies in carbon capture, biofuels, environmentally sensitive energy production, as well as wind, geothermal and solar. What happens here is going to dictate how other markets globally deal with the carbon issue.

Q: Is oil or natural gas the bigger opportunity at this point, and why?

Moors (A): Natural gas, at the moment, is the preferable move, given the move to shale production, the rising dependence of electricity production on gas and the plentiful supplies of gas in the U.S. and Canada. However, increasing concerns over adequate supplies of crude oil in the face of expected rising demand will shortly increase profitability of operating companies and processors. Here we will be particularly interested in tracking those operators of medium-sized fields having efficiency advantages and those refineries able to benefit from the currency swings between the dollar and the euro - that is, those providing oil-product flows or swaps involving both continents.

Q: What's your outlook for oil prices - near and long-term? How about gasoline prices at the pump?

Moors (A): Once we stabilize the oil market - that is, once the outside pressures of credit crunches, financial meltdowns, countries like Greece threatening to fall off the map, and an artificially low forex value for the euro ease - demand returns and supply will be hard-pressed to meet it. Oil prices will start rising. The rise will accelerate more in paper barrels (futures contracts) than in the wet barrels (actual oil consignments). That means the price increase will be greater than the actual underlying market dynamics would justify.

A new bubble is in the making that will make the price of oil very volatile. However, prices will be going up steadily. For each $1 rise in a barrel of crude, we can expect a $0.012 rise in average gasoline prices. We could easily be [at a new record high of] $150 a barrel by July of 2011, with a national average (without California) of about $3.80 a gallon.

Q: You say it's no longer enough to just buy the oil majors: Who takes that place as the energy-sector blue chip? If there is one...

Moors (A): The new "blue chips" in the energy sector are going to be energy-sector indices - ETFs and ETNs (exchange-traded funds and exchange-traded notes). I will be setting up my own for our use in the new Energy Advantage advisory service and also will be breaking down those used by others. The key to the "New Energy Sector" is to ride the wave of sectors more than individual stocks. More frequently, appraising individual stocks in this environment will involve our contrasting them to indices, [as opposed to] other stocks.

Q: You see China playing a major role in all of this. While that's no surprise to Money Morning readers, I'm willing to bet that investors who rely on the mainstream media will find that to be a revelation. Could you give us the basic blueprint for what you see happening?

Moors (A): The answer here is simple. The energy market will be driven by demand and China is the new 800-pound gorilla in the room. It is a barometer of demand activities globally.

Q: Does commercial nuclear power finally make its long-awaited comeback in the U.S. market? Who stand to be the leading players here?

Moors (A): Nuclear is back (the stigma is gone). However, the lead time for a traditional nuclear reactor coming on line - combined with the regulatory requirements and the expanded up-front capital requirements - will limit the ability of large-sized nuclear power plants to make a significant impact in the next five to 10 years.

The same is not true, on the other hand, in the rapidly expanding mini-reactor market. These are actually self-contained, maintenance-free "nuclear batteries," able to provide power to communities and rural areas for 30 [years] to 60 years before replacement. Babcock & Wilcox Co. - a soon-to-be spun-off unit of McDermott International (NYSE: MDR) - and Toshiba Corp. (OTC: TOSBF/Tokyo: 6502) are the early leaders here.

Q: Wind and solar have both had their moments with investors in recent years. Are they real investment opportunities? Anybody you like here?

Moors (A): There are some [players] that are coming into focus. Electricity produced by either remains less-cost effective than power produced by more traditional means. There remains some question about how much of the energy mix will actually end up being provided by wind and solar. Nonetheless, while there are some regional plays that may prove enticing, I would remain an investor in a broad ETF weighted for better performing wind and solar opportunities. Two fit well currently: PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (AMEX: PBW) and First Trust Nasdaq Green Energy ETF (Nasdaq: QCLN).

Q: What are the signs we need to watch for that will signal us when these "New Energy Sector" trends are really ready to take hold?

Moors (A): When NYMEX and Brent crude oil prices sustain closings above $125 for five consecutive trading sessions, combined with the most liquid energy-based ETFs all moving across their 120-day moving averages. Once again, the Energy Advantage advisory service will be tracking these developments and establishing what amounts to a directional "index of indices" to plot the acceleration.

Q: Anything else investors need to watch for/ be aware of?

Moors (A): With apologies for deliberately misquoting Bette Davis ("All About Eve," 1950), let me just say: "Buckle up, it's going to be a bumpy ride." (What she actually said was, "Fasten your seatbelts, it's going to be a bumpy night.")

[Editor's Note: Dr. Kent Moors, a regular contributor to Money Morning, is the editor of "The Oil & Energy Investor," a newsletter for individual investors. In a career that spans 31 years, Dr. Moors has been consulting the energy industry's biggest players, including six of the world's Top 10 oil companies and the leading natural gas producers throughout Russia, the Caspian Basin, the Persian Gulf and North Africa. His experiences - as well as his unrivaled industry access, contacts and insights - will serve as the foundation for the Energy Advantage, an advisory service that debuts this week. For more information on that service, please click here.]

Wirehouse Push Into Indie-BD Space Could Follow Wells’ Model

(Photo: AP)

Experts say that an anticipated move by some wirehouse brokerage firms into the independent broker-dealer market could resemble the channels introduced by Wells Fargo (WFC) and the firms it acquired as part of its ’08 merger with Wachovia.

The wirehouse push was outlined in a recent report, “The Independent Reps & Independent Broker/Dealers Market: The 21st Century Model?” published by the consultancy Tiburon Strategic Advisors. The report says the wirehouses are looking at a semi-independent model as one way to capture and retain more brokers.

“At least one of them and maybe two will in 2012 create halfway houses, where the allow reps to utilize their brands but take over some of their own economics, earn a higher payout, pay their own staff, pay their own technology, pay their own rent, etc.,” said Chip Roame (right), head of Tiburon Strategic Advisors, in an interview with AdvisorOne.

Other experts, while not convinced on the short-term introduction of any new wirehouse channel, agree that the competitive environment means they must, at least, seriously consider such a development.

“For years, they dismissed [independence] as a source of lost advisors or part of their planned attrition,” said Mindy Diamond of Diamond Consultants, a recruiting firm, in an interview. “But the breakaway-broker movement is having an impact: They aren’t losing that much in terms of quantity, but they are in terms of quality. There is no question about that.”

Wells Fargo’s independent model, FiNet, is a success, Diamond says. “Advisors feel protected but also able to keep more of their fees and commissions, and [Wells Fargo] pays nice transition money.  It’s a tremendous success,” she explained.

FiNet has about 1,050 reps, while another Wells’ channel called Profit Formula reportedly has several hundred advisors.

The Profit Formula platform, experts say, lets advisors retain their status as employees while requiring them to pay for some office and other expenses in return for higher payouts. It has given the advisors the freedom to set and distribute their own bonuses to staff, for instance. But, financially, it doesn’t appear to be such a great deal for Wells Fargo.

“They’re not expanding it and not letting reps transfer into it,” said Danny Sarch of Leitner Sarch, an executive-search firm, in an interview. “Advisors love it, and no [Profit Formula] reps are leaving.”

Wells and the other firms still have to figure out the best way to profit from semi-independent and fully independent platforms, he adds.

And from the advisors perspective, Sarch says, the appeal is limited. “The disadvantage of being on a caputured-independent platform with Wells Fargo, LPL Financial (LPLA) or Raymond James (RJF), for instance, is that you deal with one broker dealer vs. being in an RIA model with many custodians and more choice about how your business is custodied.

What the wirehouses must do, he notes “is to do something to differentiate themselves from each other and come up with a value proposition as to why they are a good choice.” Until they do that, Sarch adds, they are must continue to boost their upfront recruiting, or signing, bonuses.

“They have to make some compromises,” Sarch said, noting that, “if they trust these [advisors] as producers, they should let them run their own practices. It makes sense as a business model.”

While it may seem to make sense in some ways, the wirehouses face many other pressures at the moment, such as integration issues related to the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (MS) joint venture and the Bank of America-Merrill Lynch (BAC) merger, for instance. Such challenges and the apparent difficulty of profiting from independent and semi-independent channels within the wirehouses could take some time to straighten out, experts say.   

“It’s been on their minds,” added Diamond. “I’m not privy to boardroom talk, but I do not know that they will ever do it.”

Roame, though, insists it is the shape of things to come.

 “Wells’ FiNet is landing some big reps but not huge numbers,” he said. “Part of the reason is, I believe, the breakaway broker trend is smaller in numbers than most others say. It’s a good offer. Wells (Wachovia really) had another offer called Profit Formula and yet another call Cap Trust. All of these had glimmers of the right idea. These ideas will all come back in 2012.”

For his part, Sarch believes we’ll just have to wait and see. “Who knows what they have on the drawing board,” he stressed. “The pressures on the wirehouse model means [many options are] being examined.”

Why Watts Water Technologies May Be About to Take Off

Here at The Motley Fool, I've long cautioned investors to keep a close eye on inventory levels. It's a part of my standard diligence when searching for the market's best stocks. I think a quarterly checkup can help you spot potential problems. For many companies, products that sit on the shelves too long can become big trouble. Stale inventory may be sold for lower prices, hurting profitability. In extreme cases, it may be written off completely and sent to the shredder.

Basic guidelines
In this series, I examine inventory using a simple rule of thumb: Inventory increases ought to roughly parallel revenue increases. If inventory bloats more quickly than sales grow, this might be a sign that expected sales haven't materialized. Is the current inventory situation at Watts Water Technologies (NYSE: WTS  ) out of line? To figure that out, start by comparing the company's inventory growth to sales growth. How is Watts Water Technologies doing by this quick checkup? At first glance, pretty well. Trailing-12-month revenue increased 8.7%, and inventory increased 8.8%. Over the sequential quarterly period, the trend looks healthy. Revenue dropped 1.3%, and inventory dropped 2.3%.

Advanced inventory
I don't stop my checkup there, because the type of inventory can matter even more than the overall quantity. There's even one type of inventory bulge we sometimes like to see. You can check for it by examining the quarterly filings to evaluate the different kinds of inventory: raw materials, work-in-progress inventory, and finished goods. (Some companies report the first two types as a single category.)

A company ramping up for increased demand may increase raw materials and work-in-progress inventory at a faster rate when it expects robust future growth. As such, we might consider oversized growth in those categories to offer a clue to a brighter future, and a clue that most other investors will miss. We call it "positive inventory divergence."

On the other hand, if we see a big increase in finished goods, that often means product isn't moving as well as expected, and it's time to hunker down with the filings and conference calls to find out why.

What's going on with the inventory at Watts Water Technologies? I chart the details below for both quarterly and 12-month periods.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Data is current as of latest fully reported quarter. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Data is current as of latest fully reported quarter. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

Let's dig into the inventory specifics. On a trailing-12-month basis, work-in-progress inventory was the fastest-growing segment, up 38.5%. On a sequential-quarter basis, work-in-progress inventory was also the fastest-growing segment, up 19.2%. Watts Water Technologies seems to be handling inventory well enough, but the individual segments don't provide a clear signal. Watts Water Technologies may display positive inventory divergence, suggesting that management sees increased demand on the horizon.

Foolish bottom line
When you're doing your research, remember that aggregate numbers such as inventory balances often mask situations that are more complex than they appear. Even the detailed numbers don't give us the final word. When in doubt, listen to the conference call, or contact investor relations. What at first looks like a problem may actually signal a stock that will provide the market's best returns. And what might look hunky-dory at first glance could actually be warning you to cut your losses before the rest of the Street wises up.

I run these quick inventory checks every quarter. To stay on top of inventory and other tell-tale metrics at your favorite companies, add them to your free watchlist, and we'll deliver our latest coverage right to your inbox.

  • Add Watts Water Technologies �to My Watchlist.

Howard Stern: The $1.8 Billion Man

They don't call him the King of all Media for nothing. As we noted here last week, shares of Sirius XM Radio (SIRI) have been on a tear lately with a gain of 9.35% so far this year. While some of the gains can be attributed to the strong market, the main driver of the shares has been Howard Stern, who renewed his contract with the company on December 9th and announced that his radio show would finally be available on smartphones. Since then, shares of the company are up over 35%. In terms of market cap, this translates into $1.8 billion dollars. While terms of the contract were undisclosed, so far Howard has been worth every penny of it. Shares of SIRI practically trade as a barometer of his popularity, so the more popular he gets, the higher the stock goes. Just last week, Howard entered the Twitter universe and the stock is up 8% since.

Howard Stern is one of a handful of celebrities who are known on a first name basis. It's not Howard Stern or Stern, but simply Howard. Like Oprah, when you say the name Howard, most people know who you are talking about. But while Sirius shares have been flying higher lately, the owner of Oprah's OWN network hasn't gotten nearly as much traction from her partnership since its launch at the start of the year. So far in 2011, shares of Discovery Communications (DISCA) are underperforming the S&P 500 with a gain of only 1.3%.

(Click to enlarge)

(Just in case Howard's reading, we won't mention the performance of SIRI since he first joined the company. But even then, the stock got a huge boost when he first signed before hitting the skids with the one two punch of the regulatory hurdles involved in its merger with XM Radio and the financial crisis.)

The Latest Moment of Kodak Hubris

The bigger they are, the harder they fall. And the bigger your ego, the more ornery your denial.

Consider the case of Eastman Kodak (OTCBB: EKDKQ). Hot on the heels of a supposedly dramatic restructuring, the storied photography firm filed for Chapter 11. And I mean right away, just a couple of days after the reorg that was supposed to save its bacon.

The company sits on a wealth of patents in film-based and digital photography, which still could turn this sad story around. Supposedly, tech giants didn't bid on the patents for sale just because a bankruptcy was coming like a freight train -- where they would receive a court blessing for the transaction and the patents would likely go on deep discount.

And that's where Kodak's latest act of hubris comes in. Management wants between $2.2 billion and $2.6 billion for that treasure trove of intellectual property.

Let that sink in for a second. Then consider that the company sports a market cap of less than $100 million and an enterprise value of $749 million. So in management's eyes, the lifesaving patents are worth at least 22 times the company's market value or three times its buyout price tag.

I don't think so, pal. CEO/Chairman Antonio Perez (who may have too much clout attached to his inflated expectations) needs to wake up and smell the napalm. This will be a fire sale.

If Perez bases that silly estimate on bidding wars of recent years like the $4.5 billion Nortel bonanza, that particular auction contained a ton of mobile technology patents and it happened just as the infringement lawsuits started flying across the smartphone sector. Sure, cameras are an important part of any modern phone, but still a relatively minor component of a very complex system.

What makes Kodak think that Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) , Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) , or perhaps Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) would be willing to overpay for its camera patents today? They were all supposedly holding out for a better deal in the first place. It would be cheaper just to buy Kodak than to haggle over its patent filings, even at a massive buyout premium.

These are some of the wealthiest companies on the planet but they didn't get that way by throwing their cash away. And it's getting easier every day to argue that they all have the patent weaponry they need for going on litigation rampage (in the cases of Microsoft and Apple) or raising a shield against such campaigns (hello, Google). The Kodak moment for patent sales has passed, so to speak.

Mobile computing is a trillion-dollar revolution. Sadly, it's killing Kodak. Find out the name of perhaps the biggest winner in a special report, 100% free, but only for a limited time.

Are the Earnings at Oclaro Hiding Something?

It takes money to make money. Most investors know that, but with business media so focused on the "how much," very few investors bother to ask, "How fast?"

When judging a company's prospects, how quickly it turns cash outflows into cash inflows can be just as important as how much profit it's booking in the accounting fantasy world we call "earnings." This is one of the first metrics I check when I'm hunting for the market's best stocks. Today, we'll see how it applies to Oclaro (Nasdaq: OCLR  ) .

Let's break this down
In this series, we measure how swiftly a company turns cash into goods or services and back into cash. We'll use a quick, relatively foolproof tool known as the cash conversion cycle, or CCC for short.

Why does the CCC matter? The less time it takes a firm to convert outgoing cash into incoming cash, the more powerful and flexible its profit engine is. The less money tied up in inventory and accounts receivable, the more available to grow the company, pay investors, or both.

To calculate the cash conversion cycle, add days inventory outstanding to days sales outstanding, then subtract days payable outstanding. Like golf, the lower your score here, the better. The CCC figure for Oclaro for the trailing 12 months is 107.3.

For younger, fast-growth companies, the CCC can give you valuable insight into the sustainability of that growth. A company that's taking longer to make cash may need to tap financing to keep its momentum. For older, mature companies, the CCC can tell you how well the company is managed. Firms that begin to lose control of the CCC may be losing their clout with their suppliers (who might be demanding stricter payment terms) and customers (who might be demanding more generous terms). This can sometimes be an important signal of future distress -- one most investors are likely to miss.

In this series, I'm most interested in comparing a company's CCC to its prior performance. Here's where I believe all investors need to become trend-watchers. Sure, there may be legitimate reasons for an increase in the CCC, but all things being equal, I want to see this number stay steady or move downward over time.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Because of the seasonality in some businesses, the CCC for the TTM period may not be strictly comparable to the fiscal-year periods shown in the chart. Even the steadiest-looking businesses on an annual basis will experience some quarterly fluctuations in the CCC. To get an understanding of the usual ebb and flow at Oclaro, consult the quarterly-period chart below.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

On a 12-month basis, the trend at Oclaro looks very good. At 107.3 days, it is 17.5 days better than the five-year average of 124.8 days. The biggest contributor to that improvement was DIO, which improved 14.1 days compared to the five-year average. That was partially offset by a 0.7-day increase in DSO.

Considering the numbers on a quarterly basis, the CCC trend at Oclaro looks OK. At 111.1 days, it is 14.2 days worse than the average of the past eight quarters. Investors will want to keep an eye on this for the future to make sure it doesn't stray too far in the wrong direction. With quarterly CCC doing worse than average and the latest 12-month CCC coming in better, Oclaro gets a mixed review in this cash-conversion checkup.

Though the CCC can take a little work to calculate, it's definitely worth watching every quarter. You'll be better informed about potential problems, and you'll improve your odds of finding the underappreciated home run stocks that provide the market's best returns.

  • Add Oclaro to My Watchlist.

SAP Acquiring TechniData AG

SAP (SAP) this morning said it intends to acquire TechniData AG, a Markdorf, Germany, company which SAP describes as “the world’s leading provider of product safety and environmental, health and safety solutions.” SAP says TechniData has nearly 500 employees. Terms were not disclosed. The deal is expected to close at the beginning of Q3.

Thomas Weisel Partners analyst Tom Roderick says in a research note that TechniData had 2008 revenue of 64.9 million Euros, with 57.7 million Euros in 2007.

SM: College-Savings Plans

Section 529 plans come in two models: The college savings plan and the prepaid tuition plan. Of the two, college savings plans are considerably more flexible, making them a better choice for most families. Here's how they work.

College Resources
  • Consolidating Student Loans
  • Best Student Loan Options
  • 529 Plan Calculator for College Savings

College-savings plans are a little bit like a very restricted 401(k). (Although with a college-savings plan you are contributing after-tax dollars, while with a 401(k) contributions are generally pretax.) In other words, you contribute money to the plan, which is then invested in some sort of savings vehicle -- typically mutual funds. Many of these plans offer stock funds when a child is quite young, which will then be transferred to more conservative investments, like bond funds, as the child gets closer to college age. Of course, unlike the prepaid tuition plans, there are no guarantees that your money will grow large enough to cover your tuition bills. But should you invest in a good plan, the returns (combined with the tax-free withdrawals) certainly give you a fighting chance. Also, these plans aren't strictly geared toward in-state schools, but are meant to be applied toward whichever school your child chooses to attend.

For stay-at-home mom Becky Harvey of Oxford, Mass., investing in a college-savings plan was a much wiser choice than a prepaid tuition plan. When her five- and six-year-old sons were first born, Harvey and her husband Greg began investing on their behalf. They initially used a prepaid plan sponsored by the state of Massachusetts, but they've since begun contributing instead to the U. Investing Plan, Massachusetts' college-savings plan, which is run by Fidelity. "Since our kids are so young, I figure with our long investment horizon that we'll do better in this type of plan," says Harvey. "Sure, you lose some stability, but the way I see it, the money we are contributing today will help us buy low and sell high."

These days it seems pretty much every major fund family, including T. Rowe Price, Fidelity, Vanguard and TIAA-CREF, has partnered up with at least one state. And since most college-savings plans allow you to invest across state lines, this means that if you don't like the plan in your home state, you can look elsewhere and most likely go with a fund family that you already trust. (You could, however, lose out on some state-tax benefits.)

Keep in mind, investing in a college-savings plan could also affect your financial-aid eligibility, although in a different way than a prepaid tuition plan. College-savings plans are typically viewed as a parental asset, rather than a child's. And that means that a financial-aid officer would count a maximum of 5.6% of those assets toward your financial-aid eligibility, says CPA Rick Darvis of College Planning, Inc.

No matter what, don't let the fear of hurting your child's eligibility for financial aid paralyze you from developing a sound savings strategy. Remember, a lot of financial aid comes in the form of student loans, which means you'll save youself (or your child) some money by planning ahead.

Read on for more on prepaid tuition plans.

Chesapeake Energy Is More Undervalued Than Enterprise, Kinder Morgan

The Street currently rates Enterprise Products (EPD) a "strong buy" compared to just a "buy" for both Chesapeake Energy (CHK) and El Paso (EP). While Chesapeake has built a solid brand name off of natural gas, it is now focusing on liquids and it is not a utilities firm like the other two. Based on my multiples analysis and review of the fundamentals, I find that Chesapeake - contrary to popular opinion of late - is the most undervalued of the three.

From a multiples perspective, Chesapeake is by far the cheapest of the three. It trades at a respective 11.9x and 10.2x past and forward earnings while El Paso , Enterprise, and Kinder Morgan (KMP) trade at a respective 21.4x, 21.4x, and 33.2x forward earnings. Enterprise (5.2%) and Kinder Morgan (5.4%) off the highest dividend yields.

At the M&A call, Kinder Morgan's CEO, Richard Kinder, explained why the combination with El Paso will be accretive to shareholder value.

"There are not a lot of times in your career when you can say that a transaction of this size and magnitude is really a win-win for both the acquirer and the company being bought, but I think that's particularly true here today. First of all, I think putting these two companies together strategically is a great fit. When we put these two companies together, we'll have 80,000 miles of pipeline, 67,000 of which will be natural gas pipes. It will create a company that when you take the whole family of companies, including the two MLPs together, will have an enterprise value of approximately $94 billion. So the result is that we will be, by far, the largest midstream energy player in North America and also in terms of enterprise value, the fourth largest energy company of any kind in North America. We will be the largest natural gas transporter. We're already the largest pipeline producer -- products pipeline system in America. We're the largest transporter of CO2 and the largest independent owner operator of terminals, both liquids and bulk".

Consensus estimates for El Paso's EPS forecast that it will grow by 5.1% to $1.03 in 2011 and then by 18.4% and 23% more in the following two years. Assuming a multiple of 21.5x and a conservative 2012 EPS of $1.18, the stock is roughly at fair value.

Enterprise has slightly greater upside given how well positioned it its growing capital allocation over the next few years. The dividend yield was recently raised by 5.4% y-o-y to $0.62/unit, which was in-line with expectations. WACC is further dropping as the company yields solid organic growth backed by a health balance sheet. Enterprise recently announced a joint venture for a pipeline specialized in offshore crude oil, which will get going some time around the middle of 2014. It is further creating a 1.2 mile long pipeline for Marcellus and Utica ethane.

Consensus estimates for Enterprise's EPS forecast that it will grow by 77.3% and $2.11 in 2011 and then by 7.6% and 7% more in the following two years.

Yet higher upside can be found in Chesapeake - an oil & gas firm that has been unreasonably criticized of late due to compensation and and financial practices. While the company technically reduced leverage by $2.2B through issuing perpetual preferred shares (basically a debt equivalent), this helped the company finance cash shortfall. Going forward, management plans to cut LT net debt by 25%. With China recently taking a one-third position in the Eagle Ford projects, momentum is starting to improve for Chesapeake.

Consensus estimates for Chesapeake's EPS forecast that it will decline by 5.4% to $2.79 in 2011, decline by 24% in 2012, and then grow by 63.7%. Of the 26 revisions to EPS, 18 have gone down for a net change of -1.1%. If the multiple increases to 14x and 2012 EPS turns out to be $2.27, the rough intrinsic value of the stock is $31.78, implying 44.1% upside.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

Why Nokia And RIM Could Tumble 30% Or More

It appears that the Nokia (NOK) and Research in Motion (RIMM) zombies are returning from the grave. Since I first published my bearish article on the two here, the stocks have risen by 12.6% and 13.5%, respectively. Even still, The Street continues to be bearish on the two tech firms, rating them closer to a "sell" than anything else. Based on my multiples analysis and DCF model, I concur with this sentiment.

From a multiples perspective, the two vary wildly, with a high beta of around 1.7. Nokia trades at 26.2x and 16.5x past and forward earnings while Research in Motion trades at a respective 4.1x and 6x past and forward earnings. These multiples are mostly speculative and not solidly grounded in the floundering fundamentals.

At the third quarter earnings call, Nokia's CEO, Stephen Elop, began his speech by skipping the part about poor results and jumping into the promise of its turnaround story:

Welcome, ladies and gentleman, and thank you for joining us on today's earnings call. Overall, I am pleased with Nokia's results this quarter. That being said, it is important to emphasize that we are on a journey during which we are systematically transforming our company for long-term success and improved financial performance. With each step of that journey, you will see us methodically implement our strategy pursuing steady improvement through a period that has known transition risks while also dealing with the various unexpected ups and downs that typify the dynamic nature of our industry.

In its attempt to reinvest itself, Nokia has cannibalized some of its revenue streams. Lumia will eat away volumes form cheaper handsets, and the Nokia Siemens Network has thus far turned out to be a complete fiasco - burning cash for much longer than what commentators were hoping. With that said, I am attracted to how the company is laying off 26% of its staff off to lower expenses, as well with the Windows Phone partnership (MSFT).

Consensus estimates for Nokia's EPS forecast are that it will decline by 54.3% to $0.37 in 2011, decline by 10.8% in 2012, and then grow by 60.6% in 2013. Assuming a multiple of 13x and a conservative 2012 EPS of $0.31, the rough intrinsic value of the stock is $4.03, implying 28.4% downside.

Research in Motion similarly has the odds stacked up against its progress. Despite solid distribution networks, EPS forecasts are sinking. BlackBerry 2.0 OS for the Playbook may pique some interest, but it lacks the appeal of tablet substitutes, like Apple's (AAPL) iPad. Even still, the main hope that the company has going for it is PlayBook OS 2.0. This will hit the market in February and come with a variety of hot features, such as an Android player, a video store and a native email system. Analysts are forecasting 1.7M shipments in 2013. Blackberry 10 OS is also a solid attempt to bring all of the the different operating systems together, but faces competitive pressure and transition issues.

Consensus estimates for Research in Motion's EPS forecast that it will decline by 34.9% to $4.13 in 2012 and then by 28.6% and 1% more in the following two years. Assuming the multiple holds steady at 4x - and I think it will, given company-specific uncertainty, to say nothing about the macro - and 2012 EPS turns out to be 2% below consensus, the stock would fall by 32.5%. Accordingly, The Street is right to rate the stock a "sell".

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

Greek Debt Talks Resume Amid Bickering

Talks to resolve the Greek debt crisis continued Thursday amid ongoing disagreements among private creditors, the European Central Bank and other parties about which degree of losses might be considered acceptable and who might have to be included in those losses.

Christine Lagarde, head of the International Monetary Fund, further roiled the waters by suggesting that the ECB and other public bodies might have to accept losses as well, something the ECB has refused to consider.

Bloomberg reported that after Lagarde made her suggestion, Michael Meister, deputy floor leader for German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democrats and the party’s ranking finance spokesman, dismissed the idea out of hand that the ECB should even consider taking losses on Greek debt. In the report he was quoted saying, “I can’t imagine that European politicians would allow third parties to make such an indecent claim on our central bank.”

So far, negotiators for private bondholders, led by Charles Dallara and Jean Lemierre, of the Washington-based Institute of International Finance, have been holding out for a higher interest rate on coupons for new bonds to be exchanged for ones presently held by Greece’s creditors.

Dallara has also suggested that all parties holding Greek debt be prepared to accept haircuts so that the arrangement is fair. The ECB has refused to consider such a measure, saying that it would jeopardize faith in the institution. Dallara pointed out on Wednesday that private creditors hold approximately 60% of Greek debt, with the rest in the hands of public institutions and other governments.

Hedge funds have also been contributing to the suspense over the discussions, with some resolved to hold out for full repayment or else a triggering of credit default swaps to achieve payment. That would result in a default for Greece and could possibly throw the entire eurozone into turmoil. 

Getting Hot Girls On Facebook

Whatever you think about social networks and sites such as Facebook, it is important to note that there are so many hot girls on Facebook. It is misleading to say that there are no cuties on this site. These ladies can be persuaded into meetings and many other deals that come out of it.

Several steps can be used to find the cutest ladies on this site. It is usually an experience that can be equated to finding a treasure that has been long lost or hidden. The experiences are memorable and thrilling. There are many people who have used this platform to recruit talent or even get girlfriends.

Searching for ladies from areas that enjoy warm climates is one strategy that can bring more results. This is because unlike their counterparts from cold areas, cuties from warm areas can post pictures in their swim suits, bikinis and such wear. It therefore is very easy to tell whether she is a cutie or not.

The common characteristic of cute girls on this social networking site is that they are young. You therefore have to focus your search to categories of ladies who are young. For example, you can try searching for a girl from the top colleges and universities.

Those that are already in employment are not considered to be hot. This is because they are probably older and too busy in their work to aggressively get involved in anything serious on the social networks.

Physical activities are also more likely to help you to get the hottest young women on social networks. During your searches, focus more on ladies who love activities associated with the young such as yoga and modelling. If you go for activities mainly associated with the older generation, you will not achieve much. You can also use friends to get more cuties.

Click here to learn more: how to get a girl to like you and how to get a girlfriend

Incoming search terms for the article:
  • hot girls of facebook
  • facebook girls
  • how to be popular girl on facebook

Top Stocks For 2012-1-23-4

Tiffany & Co. (NYSE:TIF) announced its financial results for the second quarter ended July 31, 2011. Net sales rose 30% over the prior year due to strong growth in all geographic regions. Net earnings increased 33% and, excluding nonrecurring charges, rose 58% in the quarter. Net earnings were $0.69 per diluted share in the quarter and, excluding nonrecurring charges, were $0.86 per diluted share. Management increased its earnings forecast for fiscal 2011 to reflect the better-than-expected second quarter results.

Tiffany & Co., through its subsidiaries, engages in the design, manufacture, and retail of fine jewelry worldwide. Its jewelry products include fine and solitaire jewelry; diamond engagement rings and wedding bands for brides and grooms; and non-gemstone, sterling silver, gold, and platinum jewelry.

Cleantech Transit, Inc. (CLNO)

Cleantech Transit Inc. was founded to capitalize on technology advances and manufacturing opportunities in the growing clean energy public transportation sector. The Company has expanded its focus to invest directly in specific green projects. Recognizing the many economic and operational advances of converting wood waste into renewable sources of energy, Cleantech has selected to invest in Phoenix Energy (www.phoenixenergy.net). This project could benefit the Company’s manufacturing clients worldwide.

Biomass is biological matter that is derived from plants and animals. It is a renewable source of energy that is primarily made up of carbon. Additionally, other elements like hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, alkali, heavy metals and alkaline earth are also integrated with carbon. Both biomass and fossil fuels are made up of biological matter, but still they are different in many ways. For instance, fossil fuels are not a renewable source of energy. Moreover, in its case, the biological matter undergoes several geological processes to form coal and petroleum. Biomass, on the other hand, is derived from living organisms, which are easily replaceable.

Cleantech Transit, Inc. (CLNO) is pleased to announce it has met its funding requirement to secure the Company’s ability to earn in 25% of the 500KW Merced Project.

The Company is in the final stages of closing its initial interest in the Merced Project and is currently working on completing the necessary documentation and expects closing the transaction soon. As previously announced Cleantech has the option to earn up to 40% of the Merced Project and the Company plans to continue to work towards increasing its interest in the Merced Project as they move ahead.

For more information about Cleantech Transit, Inc. visit its website www.cleantechtransitinc.com

Ameriprise Financial Inc. (NYSE:AMP) plans to host a live audio webcast of its third quarter investor conference call on Thursday, October 27, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. (ET). The company’s third quarter 2011 financial results are scheduled to be released on Wednesday, October 26, 2011 soon after the market closes. The company plans to host a live audio webcast of its annual Financial Community Meeting on Wednesday, November 16, 2011. The meeting will be held at the New York Stock Exchange beginning at 9:00 a.m. (ET). Senior management will update the financial community on the company’s performance, strategy and key areas of focus.

Ameriprise Financial, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides financial planning, products, and services primarily in the United States.

Mueller Industries Inc. (NYSE:MLI) announced that it entered into a Standstill Agreement with Leucadia National Corporation whereby Leucadia agreed to own no more than 27.5% of Mueller’s outstanding common stock and (Leucadia is entitled to appoint up to two directors to the Company’s Board of Directors. Pursuant to the Standstill Agreement, Leucadia nominated, and the Company’s Board of Directors unanimously elected, Ian M. Cumming, Chairman of Leucadia, and Joseph S. Steinberg, President of Leucadia, to serve on Mueller’s Board of Directors.

Mueller Industries, Inc. manufactures copper, brass, plastic, and aluminum products. It operates in two segments, Plumbing & Refrigeration, and Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM).

Top Stocks For 2012-1-23-8

Tiffany & Co. (NYSE:TIF) announced its financial results for the second quarter ended July 31, 2011. Net sales rose 30% over the prior year due to strong growth in all geographic regions. Net earnings increased 33% and, excluding nonrecurring charges, rose 58% in the quarter. Net earnings were $0.69 per diluted share in the quarter and, excluding nonrecurring charges, were $0.86 per diluted share. Management increased its earnings forecast for fiscal 2011 to reflect the better-than-expected second quarter results.

Tiffany & Co., through its subsidiaries, engages in the design, manufacture, and retail of fine jewelry worldwide. Its jewelry products include fine and solitaire jewelry; diamond engagement rings and wedding bands for brides and grooms; and non-gemstone, sterling silver, gold, and platinum jewelry.

Cleantech Transit, Inc. (CLNO)

Cleantech Transit Inc. was founded to capitalize on technology advances and manufacturing opportunities in the growing clean energy public transportation sector. The Company has expanded its focus to invest directly in specific green projects. Recognizing the many economic and operational advances of converting wood waste into renewable sources of energy, Cleantech has selected to invest in Phoenix Energy (www.phoenixenergy.net). This project could benefit the Company’s manufacturing clients worldwide.

Biomass is biological matter that is derived from plants and animals. It is a renewable source of energy that is primarily made up of carbon. Additionally, other elements like hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, alkali, heavy metals and alkaline earth are also integrated with carbon. Both biomass and fossil fuels are made up of biological matter, but still they are different in many ways. For instance, fossil fuels are not a renewable source of energy. Moreover, in its case, the biological matter undergoes several geological processes to form coal and petroleum. Biomass, on the other hand, is derived from living organisms, which are easily replaceable.

Cleantech Transit, Inc. (CLNO) is pleased to announce it has met its funding requirement to secure the Company’s ability to earn in 25% of the 500KW Merced Project.

The Company is in the final stages of closing its initial interest in the Merced Project and is currently working on completing the necessary documentation and expects closing the transaction soon. As previously announced Cleantech has the option to earn up to 40% of the Merced Project and the Company plans to continue to work towards increasing its interest in the Merced Project as they move ahead.

For more information about Cleantech Transit, Inc. visit its website www.cleantechtransitinc.com

Ameriprise Financial Inc. (NYSE:AMP) plans to host a live audio webcast of its third quarter investor conference call on Thursday, October 27, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. (ET). The company’s third quarter 2011 financial results are scheduled to be released on Wednesday, October 26, 2011 soon after the market closes. The company plans to host a live audio webcast of its annual Financial Community Meeting on Wednesday, November 16, 2011. The meeting will be held at the New York Stock Exchange beginning at 9:00 a.m. (ET). Senior management will update the financial community on the company’s performance, strategy and key areas of focus.

Ameriprise Financial, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides financial planning, products, and services primarily in the United States.

Mueller Industries Inc. (NYSE:MLI) announced that it entered into a Standstill Agreement with Leucadia National Corporation whereby Leucadia agreed to own no more than 27.5% of Mueller’s outstanding common stock and (Leucadia is entitled to appoint up to two directors to the Company’s Board of Directors. Pursuant to the Standstill Agreement, Leucadia nominated, and the Company’s Board of Directors unanimously elected, Ian M. Cumming, Chairman of Leucadia, and Joseph S. Steinberg, President of Leucadia, to serve on Mueller’s Board of Directors.

Mueller Industries, Inc. manufactures copper, brass, plastic, and aluminum products. It operates in two segments, Plumbing & Refrigeration, and Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM).

The Debt-Ceiling Debacle: Three Investments to Make Before Washington Disfigures Your Portfolio

One night at dinner a few years back, my Dad, Greg Fitz-Gerald, explained exactly why the "tax-takers" in Washington think that recoveries, bailouts, negotiations and stimulus packages are a good idea - while the taxpayers believe just the opposite.

"When you rob Peter to pay Paul, Paul generally thinks this is a good idea," he said.

When we look at the debt-ceiling debacle that's unfolding in Washington, you can see exactly what my Dad was saying. That's why I'm not going to mince words here: The debt debate is a complete sham and an utter disgrace. A costly reckoning is headed our way.

The country can't avoid the fallout.

But you can.

In fact, I'm going to show you three moves that will help you dodge the worst of the damage - and perhaps even profit.

Appalled and DisgustedThat our tax-taking leaders would play political chicken with our national wealth and our future is appalling and disgusting.

The sad thing is "they" could fix this in a New York minute if they really wanted to. It wouldn't be pretty nor would it be the "best solution," but it would be a start - especially when it comes to the bond markets, which are blithely going about their business.

Evidently somebody has forgotten to tell the traders who run this $3 trillion party that their world is about to change. The very notion that we should have stability flies in the face of everything we know about the political incompetence that now threatens it.

Moreover, Lipper Inc. notes that bond market inflows are about $4.46 billion a week - and that's just the taxable stuff. There's another $99 billion worth of two-year notes on the block this week, and they're all likely to be purchased by investors seeking "safe-haven" investments.

In an era of trillion-dollar liabilities, I find it incredibly ironic that anyone would seek safety in the U.S. dollar, let alone in U.S. government paper. Yet, that's exactly what's happening.

I usually refer to situations like these as processes of limited choice. But in reality it's more like one choice: taking our medicine now, or taking it later. Kicking the can down the road will not help.

The way I see things, there are no longer any really good choices. In fact, the only logical choice is for all of us - and especially the U.S. government - to stop living beyond our means.

When we (the taxpaying citizens) spend money, we buy goods and services. When the government spends the money that it's collected from us, it buys votes.

In the weeks and months to come, we're going to find out for sure exactly whose spending is better for the economy. But I'll make a prediction: It isn't the government's.

Unfortunately, fixing this requires change. And change isn't something that any of us - our leaders included - have been particularly good at ... at least not short of a crisis that forces change.

But that's very much the world we live in. We want for our political fixes to be quick and easy.
If the nice man or woman on Capitol Hill wants to vote in such a way that we feel no pain, we're all over it. Never mind that we'll actually have to pay for this someday.

The problem is one that I have addressed time and again, and this is what's at the core of the debt debate right now: Political fixes cannot by their very nature be quick and easy.

That's especially true when they are long-cycle, which means they've taken years to form and will take years to work their way out of the system either by chance, design, growth, or some combination of all three.

We don't need our own version of a Greek vacation: Is anybody in Washington listening?

Three Steps Toward Debt-Ceiling SecurityGiven this rather dour outlook, the best thing you can do is to protect yourself, and those in your household. To do that, I'm suggesting three moves that are worth making in advance of the Aug. 2 debt-ceiling deadline.

You need to:

  • Hedge Your Bets: If Washington blows it, U.S. Treasuries will suffer, with the long end of the curve getting whacked hardest. The Rydex Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy Fund (NYSE: RYJUX) will profit as that happens, and can be used in conjunction with existing portfolios as a hedge.
  • Go For The Gold: Metals - especially gold - will take on new significance if fiat currencies fail, and the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (NYSE: GLD) is a good way to capitalize on the surge that we'll see. But be leery of overstaying your welcome. If failure at the negotiating table or a default appears imminent, this could shoot for the moon; but if an agreement is reached, gold could fall faster than Representative Weiner.
  • Get Some Kicks From the VIX: The iPath S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (NYSE: VZZB) is truly a day trader's choice that may be best immediately preceding the deadline - but certainly not much longer than that. Prices reset daily, making tracking a problem.
[Editor's Note: If this is the kind of financial-market intelligence that you demand, you need to be reading The Money Map Report. Our monthly newsletter gets behind the stories and looks at the trends and powerful global money flows that are creating some of the best investing opportunities of our lifetimes. Those trends - as well as some great protection tips - will leave you better-informed, safer and wealthier than you've ever been.

You can get this market intelligence delivered to you monthly with our affiliate, the The Money Map Report. Please click here to learn more about our latest offer.]

Armchair Pilots Pursue Uplifting Experiences in Their Homes

OBERTSHAUSEN, Germany—Hans Krohn climbs into his cockpit, adjusts the computers and enters flight coordinates for New York's La Guardia Airport. Upstairs, his cat crawls around the kitchen.

Mr. Krohn's cockpit is part of a homemade flight simulator that never leaves his home. Yet it has dials, switches and pedals almost exactly like those on a genuine jet plane. The 52-year-old banker has spent more than 15 years building his machine, at a cost of more than $20,000.

Come Fly With Me

View Slideshow

Matthew Sheil

Australian Matthew Sheil has spent years building one of the world's most sophisticated amateur flight simulators in the garage of his truck-parts company in Sydney.

  • More photos and interactive graphics

"When I started, it was a really weird hobby," says Mr. Krohn. Today, anyone can buy a disembodied cockpit almost good enough to train airline pilots—the only issue is price.

To extreme builders like Mr. Krohn, fake flying is only part of the fun. Their true fascination is figuring out how to simulate a simulator.

"Mine's made out of beer cans and truck parts," says Australian Matt Sheil, who built a 747 jumbo jet cockpit in the garage of his truck-equipment company in Sydney. His simulator runs off 14 computers using 45 programs, some of them custom written. It can bank and pitch, like a real plane. Yet the steering column is an exhaust pipe. "You'd be surprised how many parts a Kenworth truck and a Boeing 747 have in common."

Professional simulators can cost more than $10 million and require a team of computer technicians to operate. Pilots use them for training because they are less expensive—and safer to crash—than airborne aircraft. Simulator interiors precisely duplicate actual cockpits. They include video screens showing ever-changing exterior views so realistic they can inspire motion sickness. Some sit on pistons that can shake and rattle pilots.

U.S. stocks gain for third week, near 6-month high

MARKETWATCH FRONT PAGE

Blue-chip stocks extend gains into a fourth day as investors drive up shares of Microsoft and IBM. But there were misses from some heavyweights, notably Google. See full story.

Where to put your money if the bond bull stumbles

The strong demand and celebrity status for bonds troubles some investors and investment strategists. They sense that this great bond bull market will slow in 2012. Indeed, with more of their nest-egg tied to bonds, investors need to ask some hard questions. See full story.

Exploiting munis� abnormally high yields

Other things being equal, tax-free municipal bonds should be yielding less than comparable Treasurys. But it is just the opposite today. A simple strategy would profit handsomely from a return to equilibrium, writes Mark Hulbert. See full story.

Readers vent gripes with mortgage lenders

Angry readers tell Lew Sichelman their horror stories in dealing with mortgage lenders. See full story.

Readers vent gripes with mortgage lenders

Angry readers tell Lew Sichelman their horror stories in dealing with mortgage lenders. See full story.

MARKETWATCH COMMENTARY

Instead of acknowledging that banks have become a part of government, we keep pretending they are private institutions, writes David Weidner. See full story.

MARKETWATCH PERSONAL FINANCE

Gold has been one of the greatest investment stories of the decade, and despite some recent weakness, its safe-haven appeal is likely to continue. But regardless of the price gyrations in gold futures and demand, do we really know what the cost of gold is in human terms? See full story.

Monday Market Momentum - Prices Go Parabolic

Two percent!

That’s how much the price of EVERYTHING has gone up IN AMERICA since Christmas Day, just 6 weeks ago. This is according to the very reliable Billion Prices Project at MIT, which collects pricing data every day from online retailers using a software that scans the underlying code in public webpages and stores the relevant price information in the database. The daily online index is an average of individual price changes across multiple categories and retailers that provides real-time information on major inflation trends.

LEI Rises Again, 0.1%

The Conference Board Economist Ataman Ozyildirim, noted that, "The LEI for the U.S. has risen rapidly for almost a year now and it has reached its highest level. But, the sharp pick up in the LEI appears to be stabilizing. As the economy moves from recovery into early phases of an expansion, the leading economic index points to moderately improving economic conditions in the near term."

The rate of increase in the 6-month trend of the LEI has fallen for the six months ended in February, however, to an 8.9% annualized rate from a 12.8% annualized rate for the six months through last September.

See full report from The Conference Board, here.

Comments? Please send them to kmcbride@wealthmanagerweb.com. Kate McBride is editor in chief of Wealth Manager and a member of The Committee for the Fiduciary Standard.

Financial Reforms Bill Gets Through Mark-up

In a surprising twist, the Senate banking committee voted Chairman Christopher Dodd's (D-Connecticut) financial reform legislation through committee "mark-up" discussions in just a few minutes without committee hearing of some 400 reported amendments. Now, it's on to the next step, debate on the Senate floor. The vote was 13-10, along party lines

It was widely expected that the bill, significantly changed from the November version, would reach the Senate floor for debate before Congress's spring recess starting March 26. But now it's not expected to reach the Senate floor before Congress reconvenes in mid-April. Negotiations between Republican and Democratic Senators on the committee had broken down just as the new version of the bill was introduced on March 15.

Leaving the amendments to be debated on the Senate floor rather than in mark-up, as is typical, helped make sure that the bill would actually get out of committee to the floor, but whether that makes for a longer and more contentious floor debate is anyone's guess. As difficult as it usually is to predict what Congress will do, a more polarized Congress makes it nearly impossible impossible to predict an outcome.

SM: The Top Alternative Funds

Gold, options, currencies, farm land, you can find investments in all of those and more in so-called alternative funds. While dozens of these mutual funds have started in the last year, a select few have been around for some time and done quite well for their investors. For the first time as part of our annual best-funds list, we've singled out 25 of the top alternative mutual funds.

Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX)

  • Manager: Michael Cuggino
  • Assets: $15.4 billion
  • Top holdings: U.S. Treasurys, gold
Also See
  • The Top 100 Mutual Funds
  • The Two Faces of Janus

The fund, which keeps two-thirds of its portfolio in gold, Treasurys and Swiss francs, is designed to preserve investors' nest eggs rather than post big returns. But recently, it has been able to do both. While the heavy reliance on such assets concerns some financial planners (Douglas Kreps, principal at Fort Pitt Capital Group, says that strategy essentially bets on a "doomsday scenario"), manager Michael Cuggino says the remaining third of the fund, which includes real estate and energy stocks, should thrive in bull markets: "Each of the assets will be volatile, but by combining them, you smooth your returns."

Merk Hard Currency (MERKX)

  • Manager: Axel Merk
  • Assets: $563 million
  • Top Holdings: Sweden's government debt, SPDR Gold Trust ETF

"The Fed will never say this, but they want inflation," says the Munich-born, California-based Axel Merk, who has bet on the dollar's decline over several years. The 42-year-old manager favors hard assets such as gold and currencies such as the New Zealand and Australian dollars, which he believes will benefit from higher commodity prices. Analysts say a number of low-cost exchange-traded funds can just as easily help investors bet against the dollar, which raises questions about whether the fund can continue to justify its 1.3 percent annual fee. "It's a really straightforward strategy that's well-suited to indexing," says Dave Nadig, director of research for IndexUniverse.com. Merk says the investors he serves want professional advice and will pay for it.

FPA Crescent (FPACX)

  • Manager: Steve Romick
  • Assets: $7.5 billion
  • Top Holdings: Aon, CVS Caremark
Methodology

SmartMoney asked Morningstar for a list of the top-performing funds over the past five years from four separate categories: U.S. Stocks, Foreign Stocks, Bonds and Alternatives. From there, we whittled down the list, eliminating funds that charge high annual expenses and have high minimum investments. We also wanted to highlight funds that any investor can get into, so we took out funds that are only available in retirement plans or are closed to new investors.

This fund's manager, Steve Romick, holds quarterly conference calls for investors, much like a public-company CEO discussing quarterly profits. Romick often has a lot of explaining to do, since he has the leeway to stuff his fund with whatever he thinks will work. He then sticks with the picks: The fund's turnover is 20 percent, nowhere near the 55 percent average for alternative funds. These days, about two-thirds of the fund is invested in stocks, especially in those of large multinational corporations that Romick says will benefit from emerging markets' growth. "He doesn't hit a lot of home runs with stocks. He hits a lot of singles and doubles," says Ron Roge, a financial planner who invests in FPA Crescent for his clients. Among Romick's recent nonstock bets: loaning money to an office building, buying farmland and picking up pools of subprime residential mortgages.

Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund (SFHYX)

  • Assets: $65 million
  • Top holdings: Pimco High Yield Institutional, SEI Institutional High Yield Bond, Nuveen High Yield Muni Bond

Early in his career Ralph Doudera struggled to reconcile investing's underlying goal - making big bucks - with his Evangelical Christian faith. At one point he bought a Porsche, then sold it after a change of heart and gave the proceeds away. Today, he makes his living managing money for individual clients but donates Hundredfold Select's management fee to a non-profit he set up. While the fund is designed to be, in Doudera's words, "a slow and steady plodder" it does so using a complex investment strategy involves using a mix of mutual funds, ETFs and derivatives. Doudera's take on bond yields, along with avoiding some stocks, helped the fund adroitly maneuver the 2008 credit crisis.

James Balanced: Golden Rainbow (GLRBX)

  • Assets: $1.3 billion
  • Top Holdings, US Treasury notes

While this fund is designed to own a broad mix of stocks and bonds, it owes its recent success to it conservative bent. S&P Capital IQ mutual fund analyst Todd Rosenbluth calls Golden Rainbow's 2008 decline of just 5 percent "outstanding" for a fund of its type, although he notes it did lag the following year when markets took off. Today, the fund is staying conservative thanks to the nation's 8.5 percent unemployment rate and trouble in Europe. Co-manager Brian Shepardson thinks Treasurys still have room to appreciate, though not to the same extent that they did in 2011. At the same time, Shepherdsonsays the fund has been cutting its stock exposure and focusing on domestic-oriented companies like retailer DollarTree and utility Portland General Electric firms he says are unlikely to be hurt by trouble in Europe.

Name Ticker 1-YearReturn (%) 5-Year Average Annual Return (%) Expenses per $10,000
API Efficient Frontier Income APIUX -4.07.0171
Columbia Balanced CBALX 3.54.478
FBR Balanced Investor AFSAX 10.64.4124
FPA Crescent FPACX 6.34.6113
Hundredfold Select Alternative Service SFHYX 5.16.1255
Hussman Strategic Total Return HSTRX 4.87.164
Intrepid Capital Investor ICMBX 5.06.7145
Ivy Balanced IBNAX 5.04.4130
James Balanced: Golden Rainbow GLRBX 4.85.3112
Janus Balanced JANBX 2.44.872
Janus Moderate Allocation JNSMX -0.33.925
John Hancock Balanced SVBAX -0.14.2117
Legg Mason Western Asset Managed Municipals SHMMX 7.75.264
Marshall Intermediate Tax-Free Investor MITFX 5.75.455
Merk Hard Curency Investor MERKX 5.05.5130
MFS Lifetime Retirement Income MLLAX 4.25.428
Permanent Portfolio PRPFX 8.18.777
State Farm Municipal Bond SFBDX 9.65.915
State Farm Tax-Advantaged Bond A Legacy SFTAX 9.25.668
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals USAGX -3.615.0115
Van Eck International Investors Gold INIVX -7.414.7125
Vanguard Wellesley Income Investor VWINX 8.35.625
Waddell & Reed Asset Strategy UNASX -2.77.0114
Waddell & Reed Continental Income UNCIX 5.44.5121
Waddell & Reed Municipal Bond UNMBX 6.35.087