They are promoted as an opportunity to benefit from share market growth, without the risk of losing capital. They involve borrowing up to 100% of the purchase price of a basket of shares for a minimum period (generally 3 – 5 years). You keep the dividends and any gains and are protected against investment loss.
The loan interest is also usually prepaid to bring forward a tax deduction and reduce a current year “tax problem”. What a deal – no downside and tax benefits!
However, even with this basic explanation, the alarm bells should ring for smart investors. PEPs play to at least one psychological bias (i.e. “loss aversion”) that investors should be wary of and contradict at least one of our wealth management decision making principles (i.e. “It’s about ends, not means”).
What’s the catch?
The downside is the borrowing cost. It includes a premium to pay for capital protection. This premium varies according to the term and volatility of the shares purchased.
It can add between 7-15% p.a. on a 3 year product and is not a tax deductible expense. So, if the typical loan rate was 7% p.a., the interest rate on the PEP would be around 14-22% p.a.
When you finance shares with a normal loan (i.e. excluding in built protection costs), you can make money, after-tax, even if the pre-tax return on the shares is the same or a little less than the pre-tax interest cost on the loan. Franked dividends and a favourable tax treatment of capital gains allow for this situation.
While PEPs also benefit from these tax effects, the additional costs of protection mean you need a very high return on your share portfolio to generate an after tax gain. If this was your expectation, you’re far better off holding an unprotected position.
Do PEPs make sense?
PEPs play to investors’ desire to make “risk-free” gains and obtain a tax benefit. But they are not a serious way to inves! t in sha res. Simultaneously eliminating the downside risk and expecting to get share market type returns doesn’t make sense. It’s the finance equivalent of alchemy.
At best, all you can realistically expect is cash type returns. To give yourself a chance of earning the higher expected returns of share markets, you need time, patience and a willingness to accept the accompanying risk.
But if your investment time horizon is short and/or your risk appetite is low, a PEP is an inappropriate investment solution. Borrowing to purchase shares is always a high risk strategy, and especially over the short term.
Offsetting this risk by adding a costly protection mechanism is extremely inefficient. It’s like driving your car with one foot on the accelerator and the other on the brake.
Summary:
1. Avoid focusing on minimising tax. You should aim to maximise your (risk-adjusted) after tax return. Tax can’t magically overcome inherent pre-tax disadvantages;
2. Don’t get seduced by complexity. It’s costly and there are usually simpler, more effective ways to achieve your objectives; and
3. Recognise that there are more efficient ways to reduce (long term) tax. Most of these, however, require some pre-planning to allow you to confidently take a longer term approach. An investment in good planning will help to avoid the costs of reactive decision making.
Wealth Foundations is an independently owned personal financial advisory firm that offers wealth management and strategic financial planning services. For more information, visit Wealth Management.
Related Articles:1 Stock to Buy in January
Steven Cohen Buys 5.2% Stake in Validus, John Paulson Reduces American Capital
Tags: 2012 Bank Stocks ,2012 Best Stocks ,AMZN ,Best Stocks To Buy 2012 ,Best Stocks To Buy For 2012 ,ODP ,OMX ,SPLS ,WMT ,Top Dividend Stocks 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment